Literature DB >> 20537598

Analysis of the incidence and clinical effect of the heterotopic ossification in a single-level cervical artificial disc replacement.

Jung-Hoon Lee1, Tag-Geun Jung, Hyung-Suk Kim, Jee-Soo Jang, Sang-Ho Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a well-known phenomenon occurring after joint arthroplasty. However, its incidence and clinical effects have not yet been clearly identified with cervical disc replacement.
PURPOSE: The first aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of HO in single-level cervical disc replacement. The second aim was to identify the relationship of HO with clinical outcomes and radiological findings. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study of 48 patients who underwent single-level artificial disc replacement in one of our clinics. PATIENT SAMPLE: Between November 2004 and December 2008, 48 consecutive patients underwent single-level cervical artificial disc replacement in Seoul Wooridul Hospital, Seoul, Korea. OUTCOMES MEASURES: Clinical outcomes were graded using visual analog scale (VAS) scores (score range, 0-10, with 0 reflecting no pain). Functional outcomes were measured using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Radiological outcomes were evaluated with follow-up dynamic X-ray.
METHODS: Occurrence of HO was investigated with the McAfee classification on the follow-up cervical dynamic X-ray. We also measured cervical range of motion (ROM) to identify HO's biomechanical effects. For the clinical effects, the VAS and the ODI were evaluated in correlation with the occurrence of HO.
RESULTS: In 48 treated patients, a total of 13 HOs were detectable. Grade 1 and 2 HO occurred in 11 patients and Grade 3 HO in two patients. Mean occurrence of HO was observed on the 11th month after the surgery. HO that led to the restriction of the ROM was not present in any patients. The clinical outcome was not significantly correlated with the occurrence of HO.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of HO after cervical artificial disc replacement was relatively high. However, Grade 3 and 4 HO that limit the ROM rarely occurred. Moreover, the occurrence of HO did not affect the clinical symptoms and biomechanical dynamics. A longer follow-up with a larger group of patients should be undertaken, which may demonstrate a higher rate of HO and long-term effects on the ROM. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20537598     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  17 in total

Review 1.  Prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Xinwei Wang; Wanshan Bai; Xiaolong Shen; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Motion analysis of single-level cervical total disc arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Shun-wu Fan; Xin-wei Wang; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.071

3.  Elastic resistance of the spine: Why does motion preservation surgery almost fail?

Authors:  Alessandro Landi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

4.  Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Hybrid Surgery and Fusion Application with Peek Cage in Patients Undergoing Three-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy.

Authors:  Güray Bulut; Aziz Çataltepe; Mevlüt Özgür Taşkapılıoğlu
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 1.033

5.  Five-year results of cervical disc prostheses in the SWISSspine registry.

Authors:  Emin Aghayev; Christian Bärlocher; Friedrich Sgier; Mustafa Hasdemir; Klaus F Steinsiepe; Frank Wernli; François Porchet; Oliver Hausmann; Aymen Ramadan; Gianluca Maestretti; Uwe Ebeling; Michal Neukamp; Christoph Röder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Clinical and radiological outcome at 10 years of follow-up after total cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Christoph Mehren; Franziska Heider; Christoph J Siepe; Bernhard Zillner; Ralph Kothe; Andreas Korge; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  [Effectiveness evaluation of Prodisc-C prosthesis for more than 10 years follow-up after total cervical disc replacement].

Authors:  Shuai Xu; Yan Liang; Zhenqi Zhu; Kaifeng Wang; Haiying Liu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-04-15

8.  Heterotopic Ossification after Cervical Arthroplasty with ProDisc-C: Time Course Radiographic Follow-up over 3 years.

Authors:  Yong-Hwan Cho; Keun-Su Kim; Young-Min Kwon
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2013-03-31

9.  The Changes in Cervical Biomechanics After CTDR and Its Association With Heterotopic Ossification: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas Hui; Kevin Phan; Mei-Yi Lee; Jack Kerferd; Telvinderjit Singh; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-06-03

10.  Heterotopic ossification in vertebral interlaminar/interspinous instrumentation: report of a case.

Authors:  Giuseppe Maida; Eleonora Marcati; Silvio Sarubbo
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2012-07-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.