Literature DB >> 20536475

Sensitivity and specificity of the nickel spot (dimethylglyoxime) test.

Jacob P Thyssen1, Lizbet Skare, Lennart Lundgren, Torkil Menné, Jeanne D Johansen, Howard I Maibach, Carola Lidén.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of the dimethylglyoxime (DMG) nickel spot test has been questioned because of false negative and positive test reactions. The EN 1811, a European standard reference method developed by the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), is fine-tuned to estimate nickel release around the limit value of the EU Nickel Directive from products intended to come into direct and prolonged skin contact. Because assessments according to EN 1811 are expensive to perform, time consuming, and may destruct the test item, it should be of great value to know the accuracy of the DMG screening test.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the DMG test.
METHODS: DMG spot testing, chemical analysis according to the EN 1811 reference method, and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF) were performed concomitantly on 96 metallic components from earrings recently purchased in San Francisco.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of the DMG test was 59.3% and the specificity was 97.5% based on DMG-test results and nickel release concentrations determined by the EN 1811 reference method.
CONCLUSIONS: The DMG test has a high specificity but a modest sensitivity. It may serve well for screening purposes. Past exposure studies may have underestimated nickel release from consumer items.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20536475     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01709.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  8 in total

1.  Chemical Identification and Confirmation of Contact Allergens.

Authors:  Paul D Siegel; Brandon F Law; Erin M Warshaw
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 4.845

2.  Hypersensitivity Reaction Post Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Due to Retained Titanium Clips.

Authors:  Fabrice Yabit; Lauren Hughes; Bertha Sylvester; Frederick Tiesenga
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-21

Review 3.  Mobile Phone Dermatitis in Children and Adults: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Clare Richardson; Carsten R Hamann; Dathan Hamann; Jacob P Thyssen
Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 1.349

4.  Nickel release and surveying in surgical clip alopecia.

Authors:  Chandler W Rundle; Sharon E Jacob
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-10-26

5.  Does clinical testing support the current guidance definition of prolonged contact for nickel allergy?

Authors:  Rosemary L Nixon; Claire L Higgins; Danit Maor; Harini Rajgopal Bala; Alka Lalji; Katherine E Heim
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Nickel chelation therapy as an approach to combat multi-drug resistant enteric pathogens.

Authors:  Stéphane L Benoit; Alan A Schmalstig; John Glushka; Susan E Maier; Arthur S Edison; Robert J Maier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Nickel and cobalt: Underestimated contact allergens in hairdressers?

Authors:  Cara Symanzik; Christoph Skudlik; Swen Malte John
Journal:  Allergol Select       Date:  2022-03-04

8.  Microneedling in the nickel-allergic patient.

Authors:  Shae Margulies; Arthur M Samia; Marjorie Montañez-Wiscovich; Sami K Saikaly
Journal:  JAAD Int       Date:  2022-08-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.