Chandler W Rundle1, Sharon E Jacob2. 1. School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA. 2. Department of Medicine (Dermatology), Veterans Affairs Hospital, Loma Linda and Department of Dermatology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Sir,We read with interest the article by Ono et al. in which a woman experienced onset of redness, itching, and focal hair loss 3 weeks after clipping surgery of her cerebral aneurysm.[3] It was noted that the four metal pins of the Sugita head holder contain allergens such as cobalt, nickel, chromium, and mercury. It was later determined that the woman had a history of contact dermatitis to metal jewelry, supporting the nickel in the etiology.While this patient did not receive confirmatory patch testing, the authors made several key observations that are notable because contact alopecia is a rarely reported entity. First, the eczematous inflammatory response preceding the alopecia is a hallmark of contact alopecia. Whereas, in alopecia areata, round, smooth patches occur where hair once was. Second, the authors astutely state that the symptoms occurred 3 weeks after the surgery and re-growth occurred at 6 months; this time course of contact associated telogen effluvium has been previous described by Tosti et al.[4]That said, it is important (and easy) to test that nickel release from the surgical stainless steel in question to have a more definitive answer. While the percentage of nickel in the alloy is important, the amount of free release nickel in direct and prolonged contact is critical [Table 1].[2] We suggest surgical metals including stainless steel be tested for free nickel release using the dimethylglyoxime (DMG) nickel spot test. DMG, often dissolved in ethanol, is a colorless liquid in its unchelated state. When two molecules come into contact with a free nickel ion, a chelate forms that is red/pink in color [Figures 1 and 2]. The higher the releasable amount of nickel, the greater the pink precipitate.[1] We do agree that patch testing is the gold standard for diagnostic confirmation of sensitization, but have also had patients refuse the testing.
Table 1
Grades of stainless steel and their compositions
Figure 1
Reaction of dimethylglyoxime with free nickel ion
Figure 2
Dimethylglyoxime test in a paper clip
Grades of stainless steel and their compositionsReaction of dimethylglyoxime with free nickel ionDimethylglyoxime test in a paper clip
Financial support and sponsorship
Loma Linda School of Medicine for support in publication fees.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.Metalallergy in the medical fieldI read a very interesting report regarding the accuracy of the dimethylglyoxime (DMG) nickel spot test by the authors. Basically, the patch test is the most important inspection item for the evaluation of allergicpatients. In addition, DMGnickel spot test[2] can be added to the evaluation of medical equipment. It is an effective inspection method in the medical field.Even in SUS316L, nickel is present in the content of 12–15%. In patients with metalallergy, the possibility of allergic reactions.Therefore, considering the frequency of occurrence of metalallergies in patients, allergic reactions caused by medical instruments seems to occur more often.In the European Union countries, the nickel content of medical stainless steel has been severely limited as a countermeasure for serious metalallergies; it cannot be sold as medical biological material if it is not tailored according to the criterion.[1]In other words, there are no legal restrictions on nickelallergy in Japan; there is a gap in the regulation compared with other countries. Standard maintenance and management of nickel-free stainless steel is not determined as a national policy. It is necessary to establish a global criterion for metalallergy, including medical equipment in the future.Finally, I emphasize that checking the history of a patient's allergy is most important as a method of preventing the metalallergic reaction in the medical field.
Authors: Jacob P Thyssen; Lizbet Skare; Lennart Lundgren; Torkil Menné; Jeanne D Johansen; Howard I Maibach; Carola Lidén Journal: Contact Dermatitis Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 6.600
Authors: S Garg; J P Thyssen; W Uter; A Schnuch; J D Johansen; T Menné; A Belloni Fortina; B Statham; D J Gawkrodger Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 9.302