Literature DB >> 36147214

Microneedling in the nickel-allergic patient.

Shae Margulies1, Arthur M Samia2, Marjorie Montañez-Wiscovich2, Sami K Saikaly2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACD, allergic contact dermatitis; SS, surgical stainless steel; allergic contact dermatitis; cosmetic dermatology; microneedling; nickel allergy

Year:  2022        PMID: 36147214      PMCID: PMC9486107          DOI: 10.1016/j.jdin.2022.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAAD Int        ISSN: 2666-3287


× No keyword cloud information.
Microneedling uses sterilized microneedles to repetitively puncture the skin, inducing a wound-healing cascade, which may improve skin appearance. Currently, there are no guidelines regarding prescreening for nickel allergy in patients who undergo microneedling but endorse a possible history of metal allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Nickel is the most prevalent trigger for ACD, affecting both men and women. Here we present a commentary on the currently available literature regarding nickel ACD and microneedling. Although microneedling has gained popularity in recent years, metal ACD to microneedles is rarely reported. Microneedling devices approved by the US Food and Drug Administration contain needles commonly composed of surgical stainless steel (SS). SS contains varying amounts of nickel, depending on the grade. Specifically, the authors’ microneedling device is composed of 316L alloy (Table I), containing 10% to 14% nickel. Although some devices have titanium-coated needle tips, it is unclear if there is sufficient nickel exposure to induce ACD in sensitized individuals. When testing the microneedling tips of the SkinPen Precision system (Crown Aesthetics) with 2 dimethylglyoxime tests (Nickel Alert [Athena Allergy] and Chemo Nickel Test [Chemotechnique Diagnostics]), twice each, negative results were noted (Fig 1). Additionally, used microneedles were similarly tested to consider the possibility of microneedle breakdown; however, these tests were negative both times. In contrast, a nickel-containing US minted nickel, used as positive control, tested positive.
Table I

Stainless steel composition of medical grade instruments

Stainless steel gradeComposition
304Iron + carbon, 18%-20% chromium, 8%-12% nickel
316Iron + carbon, 16%-18% chromium, 10%-14% nickel, 2%-3% molybdenum
409Iron + carbon, 10.5%-11.75% chromium, 0.5% nickel
410Iron + carbon, 11.5%-13.5% chromium, 0.75% nickel
420Iron + carbon, 12%-14% chromium, 0% nickel
430Iron + carbon, 16%-18% chromium, 0%-0.75% nickel
440Iron + carbon, 16%-18% chromium, 0% nickel

Adapted from Boyd and Hylwa.

Stainless steel found in the microneedles used by authors.

Fig. 1

Microneedling tip with negative reaction using 2 dimethylglyoxime tests, twice each.

Stainless steel composition of medical grade instruments Adapted from Boyd and Hylwa. Stainless steel found in the microneedles used by authors. Microneedling tip with negative reaction using 2 dimethylglyoxime tests, twice each. A PubMed literature search for the terms “microneedle,” “allergy,” “allergic contact dermatitis,” and “nickel allergy” was performed, revealing 1 report of skin eruption 6 days after microneedling with a Dermaroller device (Derma India) containing titanium-coated tips of stainless steel needles. Patch testing later revealed a positive nickel reaction. However, this study was limited in that there was no allergy testing to utilized local anesthetics or antiseptics. Similarly, 2 cases of ACD have been reported after exposure to nickel-containing hypodermic needles. In a test of SS ear piercings, SS (316L alloy) was found to release nickel at a rate of <0.05 μg/cm2/wk and did not elicit ACD in patients with a known nickel allergy. As it pertains to microneedles, it is unclear if nickel ions are released with use. Our testing of the SkinPen Precision system suggests either a true negative or that the percentage of nickel is too low to detect with dimethylglyoxime testing, which is only 59.3% sensitive. Given the high prevalence of nickel ACD, a screening question may be of benefit during cosmetic consultations. Further prospective clinical studies are needed to make discrete recommendations given the scarcity of relevant literature investigating this subject. Another approach may be to perform microneedling test spots in patients with patch test-proven nickel allergy to assess whether a cutaneous reaction occurs, though further research is needed.

Conflicts of interest

None disclosed.
  4 in total

1.  Sensitivity and specificity of the nickel spot (dimethylglyoxime) test.

Authors:  Jacob P Thyssen; Lizbet Skare; Lennart Lundgren; Torkil Menné; Jeanne D Johansen; Howard I Maibach; Carola Lidén
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  A Cutaneous Reaction to Microneedling for Postacne Scarring Caused by Nickel Hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Savita Yadav; Sunil Dogra
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.283

3.  Nickel release from surgical instruments and operating room equipment.

Authors:  Anne H Boyd; Sara A Hylwa
Journal:  Dermatol Online J       Date:  2018-04-15

4.  Nickel contact dermatitis from hypodermic needles.

Authors:  Vandana Mehta; Vani Vasanth; C Balachandran
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.494

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.