Literature DB >> 17051790

Effect of loading rate on the fate of mercury in littoral mesocosms.

Diane M Orihel1, Michael J Paterson, Cynthia C Gilmour, R A Bodaly, Paul J Blanchfield, Holger Hintelmann, Reed C Harris, John W M Rudd.   

Abstract

The effects of changes in atmospheric mercury (Hg) deposition on aquatic ecosystems are poorly understood. In this study, we examined the biogeochemical cycling of Hg in littoral mesocosms receiving different loading rates (7-107 microg Hg m(-2) year(-1)). We added a 202Hg-enriched preparation to differentiate the experimentally added Hg from the ambient Hg in the environment. This approach allowed us to follow the distribution and methylation of the isotopically enriched ("spike") Hg in the mesocosms. Within 3 weeks, spike Hg was distributed throughout the main environmental compartments (water, particles, periphyton, and sediments) and began to be converted to methylmercury (MeHg). Concentrations of spike total Hg and MeHg in these compartments, measured after 8 weeks, were directly proportional to loading rates. Thus, Hg(II) availability was the limiting factor for the major processes of the biogeochemical Hg cycle, including methylation. This is the first study to demonstrate a proportional response of in situ MeHg production to atmospherically relevant loading levels. On the basis of mass balances, we conclude that loading rate had no effect on the relative distribution of spike Hg among the main compartments or on the fraction of spike Hg converted to MeHg. Therefore, loading rate did not change the relative magnitude of biogeochemical pathways competing for Hg within the mesocosms. These data suggest that reductions of Hg deposition to lake surfaces would be equally effective across a broad range of deposition rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17051790     DOI: 10.1021/es060823+

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

1.  Mercury trends in fish from rivers and lakes in the United States, 1969-2005.

Authors:  Ann T Chalmers; Denise M Argue; David A Gay; Mark E Brigham; Christopher J Schmitt; David L Lorenz
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Whole-ecosystem study shows rapid fish-mercury response to changes in mercury deposition.

Authors:  Reed C Harris; John W M Rudd; Marc Amyot; Christopher L Babiarz; Ken G Beaty; Paul J Blanchfield; R A Bodaly; Brian A Branfireun; Cynthia C Gilmour; Jennifer A Graydon; Andrew Heyes; Holger Hintelmann; James P Hurley; Carol A Kelly; David P Krabbenhoft; Steve E Lindberg; Robert P Mason; Michael J Paterson; Cheryl L Podemski; Art Robinson; Ken A Sandilands; George R Southworth; Vincent L St Louis; Michael T Tate
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Mercury in the pelagic food web of Lake Champlain.

Authors:  Eric K Miller; Celia Chen; Neil Kamman; James Shanley; Ann Chalmers; Brian Jackson; Vivien Taylor; Eric Smeltzer; Pete Stangel; Angela Shambaugh
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Pathways of CH3Hg and Hg ingestion in benthic organisms: an enriched isotope approach.

Authors:  Vivien F Taylor; Deenie Bugge; Brian P Jackson; Celia Y Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  A New Monitoring Effort for Asia: The Asia Pacific Mercury Monitoring Network (APMMN).

Authors:  Guey-Rong Sheu; David A Gay; David Schmeltz; Mark Olson; Shuenn-Chin Chang; Da-Wei Lin; Ly Sy Phu Nguyen
Journal:  Atmosphere (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.686

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.