Literature DB >> 20535494

Reduced benefit from mnemonic strategies in early-stage Alzheimer's disease: a brief testing-the-limits paradigm for clinical practice.

Ingo Uttner1, Niklas Schurig, Christine A F von Arnim, Christian Lange-Asschenfeldt, Hayrettin Tumani, Matthias W Riepe.   

Abstract

Discriminating incipient Alzheimer's disease (AD) from major depression (MD) and age related memory decline is a challenge in clinical practice. Since AD is characterized by an early loss of neuronal and functional plasticity, a dynamic test strategy, such as the testing-the-limits (TtL) approach, that measures learning capacity can be a helpful diagnostic tool. To evaluate this, a short recognition paradigm consisting of a pre-test (baseline) and two post-test conditions with an interposed encoding instruction was developed and administered to individuals with incipient AD (n = 19; Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) 26.5), patients with depressive disorders (n = 11; MMSE 30), and healthy controls (n = 11; MMSE 30). In addition, participants completed a set of traditional neuropsychological tests that focused on the subjects' cognitive baseline performance. Intergroup comparisons (Kruskal-Wallis, U test) revealed significantly higher post-test failure rates in AD patients. Pre-test performance of MD and AD patients did not differ. Intra-group comparisons (Friedman, Wilcoxon test) showed that all three subject samples benefit from intervention in post-test 1. In contrast to MD and healthy individuals, who revealed significantly lower failure rates in post-test 2 compared to the pre-test, AD patients did not improve. Out of the 15 traditional test scores obtained, only two discriminated simultaneously between AD and each of the other groups. Our data confirm the finding of an impaired cognitive plasticity already present in very early stages of AD and illustrate the efficiency of a dynamic test approach in identifying incipient dementia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20535494     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-010-5610-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  62 in total

1.  Automatic and effortful memory processes in elderly persons with organic brain pathology.

Authors:  M L Rohling; N R Ellis; F Scogin
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1991-07

2.  Depressive deficits in memory: processing initiative and resource allocation.

Authors:  H C Ellis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1990-03

Review 3.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.

Authors:  T A Salthouse
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Age deficits in recall under optimal study conditions.

Authors:  J C Rabinowitz
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1989-09

5.  Incidence of dementia in mild cognitive impairment in the cardiovascular health study cognition study.

Authors:  Oscar L Lopez; Lewis H Kuller; James T Becker; Corinne Dulberg; Robert A Sweet; H Michael Gach; Steven T Dekosky
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2007-03

6.  Learning potential: a new method for assessing cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Rocío Fernández-Ballesteros; María Dolores Zamarrón; Lluís Tàrraga
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.878

7.  A comparative study of two psychometric approaches to detect risk status for dementia.

Authors:  Tenko Raykov; Margret M Baltes; Karl M Neher; Doris Sowarka
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.140

Review 8.  Problems of differential diagnosis between depressive pseudodementia and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  H G Zapotoczky
Journal:  J Neural Transm Suppl       Date:  1998

9.  Relationship between plasticity, mild cognitive impairment and cognitive decline.

Authors:  M Dolores Calero; Elena Navarro
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.813

10.  The neuropsychological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Elsdon Storey; Glynda J. Kinsella; Melissa J. Slavin
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.472

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Efficiency, capacity, compensation, maintenance, plasticity: emerging concepts in cognitive reserve.

Authors:  Daniel Barulli; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 20.229

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.