| Literature DB >> 20535400 |
Ji-Sun Kim1, Min-Kyoung Kim, Hee-Seon Kim.
Abstract
Inadequate dietary intakes and poor health behaviors are of concern among rural residents in Korea. This study is conducted to compare dietary intakes, dietary diversity score (DDS), mean nutrient adequacy ratio (MAR) and health related behaviors by rural, factory and urban areas in Asan. A total of 930 adults (351 men and 579 women) were interviewed to assess social economic status (SES), health related behaviors and food intakes by a 24-hour recall method. Mean age was 61.5 years with men being older (64.8 years) than women (59.3 years, p<0.001). Men in the factory area were older than rural or urban men while urban women were the youngest. Education and income of urban residents were higher than other area residents. There were more current drinkers in urban area while smoking status was not different by regions. Physical activity was significantly higher in rural or factory areas, whilst urban residents exercised more often (p<0.05). Rural or factory area residents considered themselves less healthy than others while perceived stress was lower than urban residents. Energy intakes were higher in urban residents or in men, however, after SES was controlled, energy intake did not show any differences. Energy-adjusted nutrient intakes were significantly higher in the urban area (p<0.05) for most nutrients except for carbohydrate, niacin, folic acid, vitamin B(6), iron and fiber. Sodium intake was higher in factory area than in other areas after SES was controlled. DDS of rural men and MAR of both men and women in the rural area were significantly lower when SES was controlled. In conclusion, dietary intakes, diversity, adequacy and perceived health were poor in the rural area, although other health behaviors such as drinking and perceived stress were better than in the urban area. In order to improve perceived health of rural residents, good nutrition and exercise education programs are recommended.Entities:
Keywords: Dietary intake; health behavior; regional comparison; rural area
Year: 2007 PMID: 20535400 PMCID: PMC2882589 DOI: 10.4162/nrp.2007.1.2.143
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Res Pract ISSN: 1976-1457 Impact factor: 1.926
Basic characteristics of the participants by regions
1Values are mean ± SD.
2Due to some missing values, the total numbers for different variables are not same. Values not sharing same alphabetical superscripts within a raw are significantly different (p<0.05) among regions by one way ANOVA and Tukey's test.
***p<0.001.
Regional comparison of health behaviors of the participants1
1Due to some missing values, the total numbers for different variables are not same.
***p<0.001
Regional comparison of energy intake and energy-adjusted nutrient intakes of the participants1
1Values are mean±SD. Values not sharing same alphabetical superscripts within a raw are significantly different (p<0.05) among regions by one way ANOVA and Tukey's test.
2Values in parentheses are the energy intakes as percentages of recommended intake levels from Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans (Korean Nutrition Society 2005).
3Age and income levels were added to ANCOVA models as covariates.
Fig. 1Regional comparison of dietary diversity score (DDS) by ANOVA
(A) and estimated marginal means of DDS after adjustment with age, income and energy intake as covariates in ANCOVA models (B) by sex. Error bars are standard error and different alphabet means significant differences among regions by post hoc test with LSD (p<0.05).
Fig. 2Regional comparison of mean nutrient adequacy ratio (MAR) by ANOVA
(A) and estimated marginal means of MAR after adjustment with age, income and energy intake as covariates in ANCOVA models (B) by sex. Error bars are standard error and different alphabet means significant differences among regions by post hoc test with LSD (p<0.05).
Regional comparison of energy-adjusted nutrient intakes by sex1
1Values are mean ± SD.
Values not sharing same alphabetical superscripts within a raw are significantly different (p<0.05) among regions by one way ANOVA and Tukey's test.