OBJECTIVES: Diagnostic challenges exist for differentiating HIV dementia from Alzheimer disease (AD) in older HIV-infected (HIV+) individuals. Similar abnormalities in brain amyloid-beta42 (Alphabeta42) metabolism may be involved in HIV-associated neuropathology and AD. We evaluated the amyloid-binding agent (11)C-Pittsburgh compound B ((11)C-PiB), a biomarker for Alphabeta42 deposition, in cognitively unimpaired HIV+ (n = 10) participants and matched community controls without dementia (n = 20). METHODS: In this case-control study, all participants had an (11)C-PiB scan within 2 years of concomitant CSF studies and neuropsychometric testing. Statistical differences between HIV+ and community controls for demographic and clinical values were assessed by chi(2) tests. Participants were further divided into either low (<500 pg/mL) or normal (>or=500 pg/mL) CSF Alphabeta42 groups with Student t tests performed to determine if regional differences in fibrillar amyloid plaque deposition varied with CSF Alphabeta42. RESULTS: Regardless of CSF Alphabeta42 level, none of the HIV+ participants had fibrillar amyloid plaques as assessed by increased (11)C-PiB mean cortical binding potential (MCBP) or binding potential within 4 cortical regions. In contrast, some community controls with low CSF Alphabeta42 (<500 pg/mL) had high (11)C-PiB MCBP with elevated binding potentials (>0.18 arbitrary units) within cortical regions. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitively unimpaired HIV+ participants, even with low CSF Alphabeta42 (<500 pg/mL), do not have (11)C-PiB parameters suggesting brain fibrillar amyloid deposition. The dissimilarity between unimpaired HIV+ and preclinical AD may reflect differences in Abeta42 production and/or formation of diffuse plaques. Future longitudinal studies of HIV+ participants with low CSF Abeta42 and normal (11)C-PiB are required.
OBJECTIVES: Diagnostic challenges exist for differentiating HIV dementia from Alzheimer disease (AD) in older HIV-infected (HIV+) individuals. Similar abnormalities in brain amyloid-beta42 (Alphabeta42) metabolism may be involved in HIV-associated neuropathology and AD. We evaluated the amyloid-binding agent (11)C-Pittsburgh compound B ((11)C-PiB), a biomarker for Alphabeta42 deposition, in cognitively unimpaired HIV+ (n = 10) participants and matched community controls without dementia (n = 20). METHODS: In this case-control study, all participants had an (11)C-PiB scan within 2 years of concomitant CSF studies and neuropsychometric testing. Statistical differences between HIV+ and community controls for demographic and clinical values were assessed by chi(2) tests. Participants were further divided into either low (<500 pg/mL) or normal (>or=500 pg/mL) CSF Alphabeta42 groups with Student t tests performed to determine if regional differences in fibrillar amyloid plaque deposition varied with CSF Alphabeta42. RESULTS: Regardless of CSF Alphabeta42 level, none of the HIV+ participants had fibrillar amyloid plaques as assessed by increased (11)C-PiB mean cortical binding potential (MCBP) or binding potential within 4 cortical regions. In contrast, some community controls with low CSF Alphabeta42 (<500 pg/mL) had high (11)C-PiB MCBP with elevated binding potentials (>0.18 arbitrary units) within cortical regions. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitively unimpaired HIV+ participants, even with low CSF Alphabeta42 (<500 pg/mL), do not have (11)C-PiB parameters suggesting brain fibrillar amyloid deposition. The dissimilarity between unimpaired HIV+ and preclinical AD may reflect differences in Abeta42 production and/or formation of diffuse plaques. Future longitudinal studies of HIV+ participants with low CSF Abeta42 and normal (11)C-PiB are required.
Authors: M A Mintun; G N Larossa; Y I Sheline; C S Dence; S Y Lee; R H Mach; W E Klunk; C A Mathis; S T DeKosky; J C Morris Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-08-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Anne M Fagan; Mark A Mintun; Robert H Mach; Sang-Yoon Lee; Carmen S Dence; Aarti R Shah; Gina N LaRossa; Michael L Spinner; William E Klunk; Chester A Mathis; Steven T DeKosky; John C Morris; David M Holtzman Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Jan P Vandenbroucke; Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Cynthia D Mulrow; Stuart J Pocock; Charles Poole; James J Schlesselman; Matthias Egger Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-10-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Nigel J Cairns; Milos D Ikonomovic; Tammie Benzinger; Martha Storandt; Anne M Fagan; Aarti R Shah; Lisa Taylor Reinwald; Deborah Carter; Angela Felton; David M Holtzman; Mark A Mintun; William E Klunk; John C Morris Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2009-12
Authors: Douglas A Green; Eliezer Masliah; Harry V Vinters; Pouneh Beizai; David J Moore; Cristian L Achim Journal: AIDS Date: 2005-03-04 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: V Valcour; C Shikuma; B Shiramizu; M Watters; P Poff; O Selnes; P Holck; J Grove; N Sacktor Journal: Neurology Date: 2004-09-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Iain C Anthony; Stephen N Ramage; Frances W Carnie; Peter Simmonds; Jeanne E Bell Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2006-05-09 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Sarah A Cooley; Jeremy F Strain; Helen Beaumont; Anna H Boerwinkle; John Doyle; John C Morris; Tammie L Benzinger; Beau M Ances Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2019-06-05 Impact factor: 5.226