Literature DB >> 17938389

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.

Jan P Vandenbroucke1, Erik von Elm, Douglas G Altman, Peter C Gøtzsche, Cynthia D Mulrow, Stuart J Pocock, Charles Poole, James J Schlesselman, Matthias Egger.   

Abstract

Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalizability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies, and 4 are specific to each of the 3 study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors, and readers. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, 1 or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (www.strobe-statement.org) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17938389     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010-w1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  360 in total

Review 1.  Parity and risk of lung cancer in women: systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Issa J Dahabreh; Thomas A Trikalinos; Jessica K Paulus
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 5.705

2.  Cognitively unimpaired HIV-positive subjects do not have increased 11C-PiB: a case-control study.

Authors:  B M Ances; J J Christensen; M Teshome; J Taylor; C Xiong; P Aldea; A M Fagan; D M Holtzman; J C Morris; M A Mintun; D B Clifford
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 3.  The association of tooth loss with all-cause and circulatory mortality. Is there a benefit of replaced teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ines Polzer; Christian Schwahn; Henry Völzke; Torsten Mundt; Reiner Biffar
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Registration of observational studies: is it time?

Authors:  Rebecca J Williams; Tony Tse; William R Harlan; Deborah A Zarin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Frequency of nonodontogenic pain after endodontic therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Donald R Nixdorf; Estephan J Moana-Filho; Alan S Law; Lisa A McGuire; James S Hodges; Mike T John
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 6.  Association Between Substance Use and Gun-Related Behaviors.

Authors:  Danhong Chen; Li-Tzy Wu
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Bundled Consent in US Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Maria L Espinosa; Aaron M Tannenbaum; Megha Kilaru; Jennifer Stevens; Mark Siegler; Michael D Howell; William F Parker
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Recommendations and proposed guidelines for assessing the cumulative evidence on joint effects of genes and environments on cancer occurrence in humans.

Authors:  Paolo Boffetta; Deborah M Winn; John P Ioannidis; Duncan C Thomas; Julian Little; George Davey Smith; Vincent J Cogliano; Stephen S Hecht; Daniela Seminara; Paolo Vineis; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Relationship between thiazolidinedione use and cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality among patients with diabetes: a time-updated propensity analysis.

Authors:  Zeina A Habib; Leonidas Tzogias; Suzanne L Havstad; Karen Wells; George Divine; David E Lanfear; Jeffrey Tang; Richard Krajenta; Manel Pladevall; L Keoki Williams
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  Intrabiliary rupture of hepatic echinococcosis, a risk factor for developing postoperative morbidity: a cohort study.

Authors:  Carlos Manterola; Manuel Vial; Antonio Sanhueza; Juan Contreras
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.