Literature DB >> 20532720

Private practice outcomes: validated outcomes data collection in private practice.

Jack Goldstein1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improved patient care is related to validated outcome measures requiring the collection of three distinct data types: (1) demographics; (2) patient outcome measures; and (3) physician treatment. Previous impediments to widespread data collection have been: cost, office disruption, personnel requirements, physician motivation, data integration, and security. There are currently few means to collect data to be used for collaborative analysis. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore developed an inexpensive, patient-centric mechanism to reduce redundant data entry, limiting cost and personnel requirements.
METHODS: Using an intuitive touch-screen kiosk interface program, all data elements have been captured in a private practice setting since 2000. Developed for small to medium sized offices, this is scalable to larger organizations. Questionnaire navigation is patient driven, with demographics shared with EMR and billing systems. Integration of billing and EMR with outcomes minimizes cost and personnel time. Data are deidentified locally and may be centrally shared. Since data are entered by the patients, minimal personnel costs are incurred. Physician disincentives are minimized with cost reduction, time savings and ease of use.
RESULTS: To date, we have collected high level data on most total joint patients, with excellent patient compliance.
CONCLUSIONS: By addressing impediments to broad application, we may enable widespread local data collection in all practice settings. Data may be shared centrally, allowing comparative effectiveness research to become a reality. Future success will require broad physician participation, uniformity of data collected, and designation of a central site for receipt of data and its collaborative comparative analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20532720      PMCID: PMC3049626          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1397-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  16 in total

1.  Orthopaedic information mastery: applying evidence-based information tools to improve patient outcomes while saving orthopaedists' time.

Authors:  S R Hurwitz; D Slawson; A Shaughnessy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Why we should collect outcomes data.

Authors:  Marc F Swiontkowski
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Electronic and computer-generated patient questionnaires in standard care.

Authors:  Susan J Lee; Arthur Kavanaugh; Leslie Lenert
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.098

4.  Hierarchy of evidence: where observational studies fit in and why we need them.

Authors:  Daniel J Hoppe; Emil H Schemitsch; Saam Morshed; Paul Tornetta; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Outcome measures and implications for sample-size calculations.

Authors:  Michael Zlowodzki; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Computerized adaptive test for patients with knee impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function.

Authors:  Dennis L Hart; Ying-Chih Wang; Paul W Stratford; Jerome E Mioduski
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Clinical interpretation of computerized adaptive test-generated outcome measures in patients with knee impairments.

Authors:  Ying-Chih Wang; Dennis L Hart; Paul W Stratford; Jerome E Mioduski
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Principles of designing a cohort study in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Dianne M Bryant; Kevin Willits; Beate P Hanson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The classic: the registry of bone sarcomas as an example of the end-result idea in hospital organization. 1924.

Authors:  Ernest Amory Codman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  18 years of results with cemented primary hip prostheses in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: concerns about some newer implants.

Authors:  Birgitte Espehaug; Ove Furnes; Lars B Engesaeter; Leif I Havelin
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  3 in total

1.  Challenges in outcome measurement: clinical research perspective.

Authors:  Daniel P O'Connor; Mark R Brinker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Stakeholders in outcome measures: review from a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Mark R Brinker; Daniel P O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  The Role of Health Kiosks: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Inocencio Daniel Maramba; Ray Jones; Daniela Austin; Katie Edwards; Edward Meinert; Arunangsu Chatterjee
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-03-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.