Literature DB >> 17678825

Electronic and computer-generated patient questionnaires in standard care.

Susan J Lee1, Arthur Kavanaugh, Leslie Lenert.   

Abstract

Patient-derived measures of disease activity have been proven to be reliable, valid, sensitive to change, and less susceptible to placebo effects in the assessment of many rheumatic diseases. Traditionally, paper forms have been used to capture this information but with advances in technology and a growing number of computer users, computerized versions have been developed. The computerized patient-derived questionnaires have been shown to be valid and reliable in many studies. Despite a concern for the usability and acceptability among inexperienced computer users and certain subgroups, such as older persons, a majority of patients queried preferred the electronic versions and found them easy to use. In addition, these computerized versions offer several advantages over the paper format, including improved data capture with less ambiguity, less long-term cost, immediate scoring and availability of the results, and--most importantly--the ability for more frequent disease activity, efficacy, and safety assessments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17678825     DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2007.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 1521-6942            Impact factor:   4.098


  8 in total

1.  Private practice outcomes: validated outcomes data collection in private practice.

Authors:  Jack Goldstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Equivalence of electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Niloufar Campbell; Faraz Ali; Andrew Y Finlay; Sam S Salek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Validation of Portuguese-translated computer touch-screen questionnaires in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis, compared with paper formats.

Authors:  Luís Cunha-Miranda; Helena Santos; Cláudia Miguel; Cândida Silva; Filipe Barcelos; Joana Borges; Ricardo Trinca; Vera Vicente; Tiago Silva
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  Hip and knee replacement patients prefer pen-and-paper questionnaires: Implications for future patient-reported outcome measure studies.

Authors:  J C Keurentjes; M Fiocco; C So-Osman; R Ostenk; A W M M Koopman-Van Gemert; R G Pöll; R G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Subjects with osteoarthritis can easily use a handheld touch screen electronic device to report medication use: qualitative results from a usability study.

Authors:  Laura Khurana; Ellen M Durand; Sarah T Gary; Antonio V Otero; Millie C Gerzon; Jamie Beck; Chris Hall; Susan M Dallabrida
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 6.  Wearable Devices in Clinical Trials: Hype and Hypothesis.

Authors:  Elena S Izmailova; John A Wagner; Eric D Perakslis
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Validation of the Mobile App Version of the EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life Questionnaire Against the Gold Standard Paper-Based Version: Randomized Crossover Study.

Authors:  Regina J M Kamstra; André Boorsma; Tanja Krone; Robin M van Stokkum; Hannah M Eggink; Ton Peters; Wilrike J Pasman
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-08-11

8.  Prototype evaluation of a self-management Internet diary for patients with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Lucia Snoei; Ad van Bodegraven; Bas Oldenburg; Theo Stijnen; Ad A Kaptein
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.