Literature DB >> 20532662

SOX2 in gastric carcinoma, but not Hath1, is related to patients' clinicopathological features and prognosis.

Xin Zhang1, Hao Yu, Yongtao Yang, Rong Zhu, Jianying Bai, Zhihong Peng, Yonghong He, Lei Chen, Wensheng Chen, Dianchun Fang, Xiuwu Bian, Rongquan Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: SOX2 and Hath1 are transcription factors that are critical for the control of terminal cell differentiation in the gastrointestinal mucosa. This study investigated the correlations between SOX2 and Hath1 expression in gastric carcinoma and patients' clinicopathological features and prognosis.
METHODS: Hath1 and SOX2 were detected by immunohistochemistry in gastric carcinoma (n = 50). Probability of survival of patients after surgery was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using Log-rank test.
RESULTS: Hath1 and SOX2 were inversely expressed in gastric carcinoma. Patients with strong SOX2 expression (++ to +++) showed lower incidences of lymph node metastasis (p = 0.007), deeper invasion (p = 0.010), and III-IV clinical stages (p = 0.011) compared to patients with low SOX2 expression (- to +). There was no significant difference in SOX2 and Hath1 expression in the cancerous tissues of the patients with and without Helicobacter pylori infection (p > 0.05). The patients with strong expression of SOX2 in their cancerous tissues (++ to +++) had a better prognosis than those with low expression of SOX2 (- to +; p = 0.005). There was no correlation between Hath1 expression level and prognosis (p = 0.676).
CONCLUSIONS: SOX2 and Hath1 are inversely expressed in gastric carcinoma. SOX2 provides a survival advantage to patients of gastric carcinoma and appears to be associated with metastasis and clinical stages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20532662     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-010-1246-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  20 in total

1.  Requirement of Math1 for secretory cell lineage commitment in the mouse intestine.

Authors:  Q Yang; N A Bermingham; M J Finegold; H Y Zoghbi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-07       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Down-regulation of a gastric transcription factor, Sox2, and ectopic expression of intestinal homeobox genes, Cdx1 and Cdx2: inverse correlation during progression from gastric/intestinal-mixed to complete intestinal metaplasia.

Authors:  Tetsuya Tsukamoto; Kenichi Inada; Harunari Tanaka; Tsutomu Mizoshita; Mami Mihara; Toshikazu Ushijima; Yoshitaka Yamamura; Shigeo Nakamura; Masae Tatematsu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  THE TWO HISTOLOGICAL MAIN TYPES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA: DIFFUSE AND SO-CALLED INTESTINAL-TYPE CARCINOMA. AN ATTEMPT AT A HISTO-CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION.

Authors:  P LAUREN
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand       Date:  1965

4.  Hath1 up-regulates gastric mucin gene expression in gastric cells.

Authors:  Akiko Sekine; Yoshimitsu Akiyama; Kazuyoshi Yanagihara; Yasuhito Yuasa
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  A mammalian helix-loop-helix factor structurally related to the product of Drosophila proneural gene atonal is a positive transcriptional regulator expressed in the developing nervous system.

Authors:  C Akazawa; M Ishibashi; C Shimizu; S Nakanishi; R Kageyama
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-04-14       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Alterations of MUC1 and MUC3 expression in gastric carcinoma: relevance to patient clinicopathological features.

Authors:  R-Q Wang; D-C Fang
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Sox2 expression in human stomach adenocarcinomas with gastric and gastric-and-intestinal-mixed phenotypes.

Authors:  T Tsukamoto; T Mizoshita; M Mihara; H Tanaka; Y Takenaka; Y Yamamura; S Nakamura; T Ushijima; M Tatematsu
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  Intestine-specific ablation of mouse atonal homolog 1 (Math1) reveals a role in cellular homeostasis.

Authors:  Noah F Shroyer; Michael A Helmrath; Vincent Y-C Wang; Barbara Antalffy; Susan J Henning; Huda Y Zoghbi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Aberrant expression of SOX2 upregulates MUC5AC gastric foveolar mucin in mucinous cancers of the colorectum and related lesions.

Authors:  Eun Taek Park; James R Gum; Sanjay Kakar; Sung Won Kwon; Guoren Deng; Young S Kim
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  SOX2 is frequently downregulated in gastric cancers and inhibits cell growth through cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis.

Authors:  T Otsubo; Y Akiyama; K Yanagihara; Y Yuasa
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  31 in total

1.  Sex-determining region Y-box 2 expression predicts poor prognosis in human ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Doo Young Chang; Imelda Mercado-Uribe; Jinsong Liu
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Downregulation of the Genes Involved in Reprogramming (SOX2, c-MYC, miR-302, miR-145, and P21) in Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Mitra Khalili; Mohammad Vasei; Davood Khalili; Kamran Alimoghaddam; Majid Sadeghizadeh; Seyed Javad Mowla
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2015-09

3.  Loss of SOX2 expression induces cell motility via vimentin up-regulation and is an unfavorable risk factor for survival of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Pilar Bayo; Adriana Jou; Albrecht Stenzinger; Chunxuan Shao; Madeleine Gross; Alexandra Jensen; Niels Grabe; Christel Herold Mende; Pantelis Varvaki Rados; Juergen Debus; Wilko Weichert; Peter K Plinkert; Peter Lichter; Kolja Freier; Jochen Hess
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Stemness-Related Markers in Cancer.

Authors:  Wenxiu Zhao; Yvonne Li; Xun Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Transl Med       Date:  2017-06-08

5.  SOX2 inhibits cell proliferation and metastasis, promotes apoptotic by downregulating CCND1 and PARP in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jianfei Luo; Ruicheng Yan; Xiaobo He; Jie He
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  Isolation of colorectal cancer stem-like cells.

Authors:  Eunice Dotse; Yuhong Bian
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 7.  Paradoxical role of SOX2 in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Estefania Carrasco-Garcia; Juliana C Santos; Idoia Garcia; Mitsue Brianti; Mikel García-Puga; José Pedrazzoli; Ander Matheu; Marcelo L Ribeiro
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 8.  Cancer stem cells in human digestive tract malignancies.

Authors:  Fatemeh B Rassouli; Maryam M Matin; Morvarid Saeinasab
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-10-07

9.  Prognostic value of Sox2 expression in digestive tract cancers: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Ming Du; Liu-Hua Wang; Xiao-Wen Chen; Yi-Xiao Li; Yu-Cong Li; Yu-Wen Cao
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-05

10.  NANOG modulates stemness in human colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Zhang; L A Espinoza; R J Kinders; S M Lawrence; T D Pfister; M Zhou; T D Veenstra; S S Thorgeirsson; J M Jessup
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.