Literature DB >> 20529967

The Danish Youth Cohort: characteristics of participants and non-participants and determinants of attrition.

Mathilde Vinther-Larsen1, Mette Riegels, Morten Hulvej Rod, Michaela Schiøtz, Tine Curtis, Morten Grønbaek.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this paper is to describe the design and methods used in the Danish Youth Cohort and to give a description of the study participants with special attention to a comparison between participants and non-participants regarding sociodemographic characteristics.
METHODS: A total of 1,945 schools were invited, out of which 506 participated. The participating 7th grades comprised a total of 12,498 responding adolescents. The response rate for the Danish Youth Cohort established in 2005 was 63%. The sample of 12,498 adolescents represents 18.2% of all pupils (n = 68,764) in the 7th grade (mean age: 13.4 years) in Danish schools in 2005. The cohort was followed up in spring 2006 and spring 2007, where the adolescents were in the 8th (mean age: 14.4 years) and 9th (mean age: 15.3 years) grades, respectively.
RESULTS: We found that compared with non-participants the participants were significantly more likely to be girls, to be of Danish ethnicity, and to live in one-family houses. Furthermore, participants more often came from families with two or three children, were more likely to have parents with a high occupational status, parents who were married and parents with a higher total income. Loss to follow-up was only associated with adolescents' higher probability of drinking and use of tobacco, and none of the other factors were associated with attrition.
CONCLUSIONS: The participants in the Danish Youth Cohort represent a great variety of different groups of socio-demographic factors, although they differ from non-participants as regards a range of socio-demographic factors. This should be taken into account in future analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20529967     DOI: 10.1177/1403494810374222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  13 in total

1.  Bias from self selection and loss to follow-up in prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Guido Biele; Kristin Gustavson; Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski; Roy Miodini Nilsen; Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud; Per Minor Magnus; Camilla Stoltenberg; Heidi Aase
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Why do people participate in epidemiological research?

Authors:  Claudia Slegers; Deborah Zion; Deborah Glass; Helen Kelsall; Lin Fritschi; Ngiare Brown; Bebe Loff
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Benefits of extensive recruitment effort persist during follow-ups and are consistent across age group and survey method. The TRAILS study.

Authors:  Esther Nederhof; Frederike Jörg; Dennis Raven; René Veenstra; Frank C Verhulst; Johan Ormel; Albertine J Oldehinkel
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Comparison of early-, late-, and non-participants in a school-based asthma management program for urban high school students.

Authors:  Christine L M Joseph; Jacquelyn Saltzgaber; Suzanne L Havstad; Christine C Johnson; Dayna Johnson; Edward L Peterson; Gwen Alexander; Mick P Couper; Dennis R Ownby
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  The Boost study: design of a school- and community-based randomised trial to promote fruit and vegetable consumption among teenagers.

Authors:  Rikke Krølner; Thea Suldrup Jørgensen; Anne Kristine Aarestrup; Anne Hjøllund Christiansen; Anne Maj Christensen; Pernille Due
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Implications of Attrition in a Longitudinal Web-Based Survey: An Examination of College Students Participating in a Tobacco Use Study.

Authors:  Carla Berg; Bennett McDonald; Regine Haardoerfer; Michael Windle; Michael Goodman
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2017-10-16

7.  Use of record-linkage to handle non-response and improve alcohol consumption estimates in health survey data: a study protocol.

Authors:  Linsay Gray; Gerry McCartney; Ian R White; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Lisa Rutherford; Emma Gorman; Alastair H Leyland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Review of prevalence studies of tic disorders: methodological caveats.

Authors:  Esther Cubo
Journal:  Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y)       Date:  2012-05-18

9.  Assessing the representativeness of population-sampled health surveys through linkage to administrative data on alcohol-related outcomes.

Authors:  Emma Gorman; Alastair H Leyland; Gerry McCartney; Ian R White; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Lisa Rutherford; Lesley Graham; Linsay Gray
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  How Healthy Are Survey Respondents Compared with the General Population?: Using Survey-linked Death Records to Compare Mortality Outcomes.

Authors:  Katherine M Keyes; Caroline Rutherford; Frank Popham; Silvia S Martins; Linsay Gray
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.