AIM: To estimate how accurately general practitioners' (GP) assessed the probability of coronary heart disease in patients presenting with chest pain and analyze the patient management decisions taken as a result. METHODS: During 2005 and 2006, the cross-sectional diagnostic study with a delayed-type reference standard included 74 GPs in the German state of Hesse, who enrolled 1249 consecutive patients presenting with chest pain. GPs recorded symptoms and findings for each patient on a report form. Patients and GPs were contacted 6 weeks and 6 months after the patients' visit to the GP. Data on chest complaints, investigations, hospitalization, and medication were reviewed by an independent panel, with coronary heart disease being the reference condition. Diagnostic properties (sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values) of the GPs' diagnoses were calculated. RESULTS: GPs diagnosed coronary heart disease with the sensitivity of 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62-75) and specificity of 89% (95% CI, 87-91), and acute coronary syndrome with the sensitivity of 50% (95% CI, 36-64) and specificity of 98% (95% CI, 97-99). They assumed coronary heart disease in 245 patients, 41 (17%) of whom were referred to the hospital, 77 (31%) to a cardiologist, and 162 (66%) to electrocardiogram testing. CONCLUSIONS: GPs' evaluation of chest pain patients, based on symptoms and signs alone, was not sufficiently accurate for diagnosing or excluding coronary heart disease or acute coronary syndrome.
AIM: To estimate how accurately general practitioners' (GP) assessed the probability of coronary heart disease in patients presenting with chest pain and analyze the patient management decisions taken as a result. METHODS: During 2005 and 2006, the cross-sectional diagnostic study with a delayed-type reference standard included 74 GPs in the German state of Hesse, who enrolled 1249 consecutive patients presenting with chest pain. GPs recorded symptoms and findings for each patient on a report form. Patients and GPs were contacted 6 weeks and 6 months after the patients' visit to the GP. Data on chest complaints, investigations, hospitalization, and medication were reviewed by an independent panel, with coronary heart disease being the reference condition. Diagnostic properties (sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values) of the GPs' diagnoses were calculated. RESULTS: GPs diagnosed coronary heart disease with the sensitivity of 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62-75) and specificity of 89% (95% CI, 87-91), and acute coronary syndrome with the sensitivity of 50% (95% CI, 36-64) and specificity of 98% (95% CI, 97-99). They assumed coronary heart disease in 245 patients, 41 (17%) of whom were referred to the hospital, 77 (31%) to a cardiologist, and 162 (66%) to electrocardiogram testing. CONCLUSIONS: GPs' evaluation of chest painpatients, based on symptoms and signs alone, was not sufficiently accurate for diagnosing or excluding coronary heart disease or acute coronary syndrome.
Authors: Patrick Kierkegaard; Mira D Vale; Spencer Garrison; Brent K Hollenbeck; John M Hollingsworth; Jason Owen-Smith Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Leen Biesemans; Lotte E Cleef; Robert T A Willemsen; Beatrijs B N Hoorweg; Walter S Renier; Frank Buntinx; Jan F C Glatz; Geert-Jan Dinant Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2018-06-02 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Marie Barais; Emilie Fossard; Antoine Dany; Tristan Montier; Erik Stolper; Paul Van Royen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Alexandre Ronga; Paul Vaucher; Jörg Haasenritter; Norbert Donner-Banzhoff; Stefan Bösner; François Verdon; Thomas Bischoff; Bernard Burnand; Bernard Favrat; Lilli Herzig Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2012-08-06 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Staffan Nilsson; Per O Andersson; Lars Borgquist; Ewa Grodzinsky; Magnus Janzon; Magnus Kvick; Eva Landberg; Håkan Nilsson; Jan-Erik Karlsson Journal: Int J Family Med Date: 2013-01-10