Literature DB >> 20883050

Use of economic evaluation in decision making: evidence and recommendations for improvement.

Steven Simoens1.   

Abstract

Information about the value for money of a medicine as derived from an economic evaluation can be used for decision-making purposes by policy makers, healthcare payers, healthcare professionals and pharmaceutical companies. This article illustrates the use of economic evaluation by decision makers and formulates a number of recommendations to enhance the use of such evaluations for decision-making purposes. Over the last decades, there has been a substantial increase in the number of economic evaluations assessing the value for money of medicines. Economic evaluation is used by policy makers and healthcare payers to inform medicine pricing/reimbursement decisions in more and more countries. It is a suitable tool to evaluate medicines and to present information about their value for money to decision makers in a familiar format. In order to fully exploit the use of economic evaluation for decision-making purposes, researchers need to take care to conduct such economic evaluations according to methodologically sound principles. Additionally, researchers need to take into account the decision-making context. They need to identify the various objectives that decision makers pursue and discuss how decision makers can use study findings to attain these objectives. These issues require further attention from researchers, policy makers, healthcare payers, healthcare professionals and pharmaceutical companies with a view to optimizing the use of economic evaluation in decision making.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20883050     DOI: 10.2165/11538120-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  32 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making: evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in australia (1991 to 1996).

Authors:  B George; A Harris; A Mitchell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Simon Innvaer; Gunn Vist; Mari Trommald; Andrew Oxman
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2002-10

3.  Moving beyond the drug budget silo mentality in Europe.

Authors:  Michael Drummond; Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments.

Authors:  Michael D Rawlins; Anthony J Culyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-24

5.  Recent developments in pharmacoeconomic evaluation in Ireland.

Authors:  Lesley Tilson; Michael Barry
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Assessing cost-effectiveness in healthcare: history of the $50,000 per QALY threshold.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Evidence and values: requirements for public reimbursement of drugs for rare diseases--a case study in oncology.

Authors:  Michael Drummond; Bill Evans; Jacques LeLorier; Pierre Karakiewicz; Douglas Martin; Peter Tugwell; Stuart MacLeod
Journal:  Can J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-05-13

Review 8.  Self-reported healthcare decision-makers' attitudes towards economic evaluations of medical technologies.

Authors:  Carmen Galani; Frans F H Rutten
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 2.580

9.  Life-expectancy gains from pharmaceutical drugs: a critical appraisal of the literature.

Authors:  Paul Grootendorst; Emmanuelle Piérard; Minsup Shim
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  How to assess the value of medicines?

Authors:  Steven Simoens
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 5.810

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Economic evaluations on centralisation of specialised healthcare services: a systematic review of methods.

Authors:  Nawaraj Bhattarai; Peter McMeekin; Christopher Price; Luke Vale
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 2.  Using health technology assessment to assess the value of new medicines: results of a systematic review and expert consultation across eight European countries.

Authors:  Aris Angelis; Ansgar Lange; Panos Kanavos
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-03-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.