Literature DB >> 20526848

Electromyographic analysis of the knee using fixed-activation threshold after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Mario Kasović1, Mladen Mejovšek, Branka Matković, Saša Janković, Anton Tudor.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish whether there are any electromyographic (EMG) differences after two different surgical techniques in two years follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Study participants were divided into three groups. The control group included healthy athletes (C), the first study group (E1) consisted of injured athletes who were treated by ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon graft and the second study group (E2) comprised injured athletes treated by gracilis and semitendinosus tendon graft. The threshold of muscle activity was defined as 30% of maximum amplitude of EMG signal medial envelope of individual muscles in the control group. Two years after reconstruction, the E2 group achieved the maximum amplitude of biceps femoris muscle signal in the takeoff phase statistically significantly later than the E1 group (0.0166, p = 0.05 and 0.015152, p = 0.05/3 = 0.016), whereas the rectus femoris muscle in the flight phase in the E2 group improved statistically significantly earlier than in the C group (0.0393, p = 0.05 and 0.025974, p = 0.05/3 = 0.016). The results of this study show particularly statistically significant differences between observed surgery techniques, which led to the change of the neuromuscular pathway during simple and controlled knee movements even two years after ACL reconstructions in athletes who returned to active training. These disturbances of muscle work coordinations in the knee joint could be tied to the function and location from which the graft was taken rather than the quality of the transplant itself. This may result in an increased risk of repeated knee injury, including potential permanent health consequences in athletes. Based on the results of this research, we were unable to establish which of the presented ACL reconstruction techniques is more appropriate. This study may be useful for athletes and their coaches, who could plan, programme and adequately adjust their training process, thereby improving knee function in the best possible way, which in turn would maintain and extend athletes' respective sports careers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20526848      PMCID: PMC3080503          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1050-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  17 in total

Review 1.  Outcome measurement in the ACL deficient knee--what's the score?

Authors:  D S Johnson; R B Smith
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Patellar tendon versus quadrupled bone-semitendinosus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective clinical investigation in athletes.

Authors:  Alberto Gobbi; Sanjeev Mahajan; Milco Zanazzo; Benjamin Tuy
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  Isokinetic and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings or patella tendon graft: analysis of literature.

Authors:  M Dauty; L Tortellier; P Rochcongar
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.118

4.  Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft versus LARS artificial ligament for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Zhong-tang Liu; Xian-long Zhang; Yao Jiang; Bing-Fang Zeng
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Muscle performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  A Kobayashi; H Higuchi; M Terauchi; F Kobayashi; M Kimura; K Takagishi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  A 7-year follow-up of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: differences and similarities.

Authors:  Justin Roe; Leo A Pinczewski; Vivianne J Russell; Lucy J Salmon; Tomomaro Kawamata; Melvin Chew
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Comparing 2-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either patella-tendon or semitendinosus-tendon autografts: a non-randomised prospective study.

Authors:  B P B Tow; P C C Chang; A K Mitra; B K Tay; M C Wong
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.118

8.  Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-21

Review 9.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring: does it really matter? A systematic review.

Authors:  Kurt P Spindler; John E Kuhn; Kevin Blake Freedman; Charles E Matthews; Robert S Dittus; Frank E Harrell
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective randomized study with a two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Lars Ejerhed; Jüri Kartus; Ninni Sernert; Kristina Köhler; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  6 in total

1.  A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system.

Authors:  Daisuke Araki; Ryosuke Kuroda; Seiji Kubo; Norifumi Fujita; Katsumasa Tei; Koji Nishimoto; Yuichi Hoshino; Takehiko Matsushita; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Koki Nagamune; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  A novel tool for objective assessment of femorotibial rotation: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Philipp Ahrens; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Florian Fischer; Petra Heinrich; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Stefan Hinterwimmer; Sonja Kirchhoff; Andreas B Imhoff; Stefan G F Lorenz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Hamstrings Neuromuscular Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  David A Sherman; Neal R Glaviano; Grant E Norte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on neuromuscular tensiomyographic characteristics of the lower extremity in competitive male soccer players.

Authors:  Pedro Alvarez-Diaz; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Silvia Ramon; Miguel Marin; Gilbert Steinbacher; Marta Rius; Roberto Seijas; Jordi Ballester; Ramon Cugat
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Muscle Activity Onset Prior to Landing in Patients after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Theisen; Isabel Rada; Amélie Brau; Paul Gette; Romain Seil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Lower medial hamstring activity after ACL reconstruction during running: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Einar Einarsson; Athol Thomson; Bart Sas; CLint Hansen; Magnus Gislason; Rodney Whiteley
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2021-03-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.