Literature DB >> 15572332

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring: does it really matter? A systematic review.

Kurt P Spindler1, John E Kuhn, Kevin Blake Freedman, Charles E Matthews, Robert S Dittus, Frank E Harrell.   

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament graft choice is controversial, with no evidence-based consensus available to guide decision making. The study design was evidence-based medicine systematic review of randomized controlled trials evaluating patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts. A literature review identified 9 randomized controlled trials comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. An evidence-based systematic review was performed. Objective and subjective outcomes of interest included surgical technique, rehabilitation, instrumented laxity, isokinetic strength, patellofemoral pain, return to preinjury activity, and Tegner, Lysholm, Cincinnati, and International Knee Documentation Committee-1991 scores. Additional surgery, graft failure, and complications were reviewed. Slight increased laxity on arthrometer testing was seen in the hamstring population in 3 of 7 studies. Pain with kneeling was greater for the patellar tendon population in 4 of 4 studies. Only 1 of 9 studies showed increased anterior knee pain in the patellar tendon group. Frequency of additional surgery seemed to be related to the fixation method and not graft type. No study reported a significant difference in graft failure between patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Objective differences (range of motion, isokinetic strength, arthrometer testing) were not detected between groups in the majority of studies, suggesting that their sensitivity to detect clinical outcomes may be limited. Increased kneeling pain in the patellar tendon group was seen consistently in the studies evaluated. Subjective differences in anterior knee pain or return-to-activity level were not consistently observed in these studies. With numbers available, failure rates were not significantly different between groups. These findings suggest that graft type may not be the primary determinant for successful outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15572332     DOI: 10.1177/0363546504271211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  109 in total

1.  Current concepts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a criterion-based rehabilitation progression.

Authors:  Douglas Adams; David S Logerstedt; Airelle Hunter-Giordano; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  Electromyographic analysis of the knee using fixed-activation threshold after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mario Kasović; Mladen Mejovšek; Branka Matković; Saša Janković; Anton Tudor
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Complications associated with realignment osteotomy of the knee performed simultaneously with additional reconstructive procedures.

Authors:  Michael Willey; Brian R Wolf; Baris Kocaglu; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

Review 4.  Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Gonzalo Samitier; Alejandro I Marcano; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Ramon Cugat; Kevin W Farmer; Michael W Moser
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2015-10

5.  Web-based survey results: surgeon practice patterns in Italy regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Alberto Vascellari; Alberto Grassi; Alberto Combi; Luca Tomaello; Gian Luigi Canata; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  A comparison of revision and rerupture rates of ACL reconstruction between autografts and allografts in the skeletally immature.

Authors:  Ian R Nelson; Jason Chen; Rebecca Love; Brent R Davis; Gregory B Maletis; Tadashi T Funahashi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  [Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization of the anterior cruciate ligament. Operative technique and short-term clinical results].

Authors:  C Kösters; M Herbort; B Schliemann; M J Raschke; S Lenschow
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Quadruple-Bundle Semitendinosus-Gracilis Graft Technique for All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael Kern; David Love; Eric J Cotter; William Postma
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-11-21

9.  Ligament Injury, Reconstruction and Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Braden C Fleming; Michael J Hulstyn; Heidi L Oksendahl; Paul D Fadale
Journal:  Curr Opin Orthop       Date:  2005-10

Review 10.  To MOON and Back: Lessons Learned and Experience Gained Along the Way.

Authors:  José F Vega; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.