Literature DB >> 20526218

Prognostic factors associated with sentinel lymph node positivity and effect of sentinel status on survival: an analysis of 1049 patients with cutaneous melanoma.

Christian Kunte1, Till Geimer, Jens Baumert, Birger Konz, Matthias Volkenandt, Michael Flaig, Thomas Ruzicka, Carola Berking, Monika-H Schmid-Wendtner.   

Abstract

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a widely accepted staging procedure in patients with melanoma. However, it is unclear which factors predict the occurrence of micrometastasis and overall prognosis and whether SLNB should also be performed in patients with thin primary tumors. At our Department of Dermatology, University of Munich (Germany), 1049 consecutive melanoma patients were identified for SLNB between 1996 and 2007, and were followed-up to assess disease-free and overall survival. Of those, a total of 854 patients were analyzed prospectively. Patients with positive SLN were subjected to selective lymphadenectomy. The association of patient characteristics with SLN was assessed by multivariate logistic regression. Survival curves were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard regression with different adjustments was used to estimate the effect of SLN on survival. The detection rate of SLN was 97.24%, of which 24.9% were metastatic. Significant parameters upon SLN positivity were tumor thickness and nodular type of melanoma. The 5-year overall survival was 90.1 and 58.1% in SLN-negative and SLN-positive patients, respectively. Upon multivariate analysis tumor thickness and SLN status were significant factors influencing both disease-free survival and overall survival. In conclusion, our data confirm that SLNB is relevant as a diagnostic and staging procedure and that tumor thickness is of predictive importance. SLN status should be taken into account when designing clinical trials and informing patients about the probable course of their disease. Our data suggest that in case of a nodular melanoma subtype SLNB should also be considered at a tumor thickness below 1 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20526218     DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0b013e32833ba9ff

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Melanoma Res        ISSN: 0960-8931            Impact factor:   3.599


  12 in total

1.  Clark level risk stratifies patients with mitogenic thin melanomas for sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  Edmund K Bartlett; Phyllis A Gimotty; Andrew J Sinnamon; Heather Wachtel; Robert E Roses; Lynn Schuchter; Xiaowei Xu; David E Elder; Michael Ming; Rosalie Elenitsas; DuPont Guerry; Rachel R Kelz; Brian J Czerniecki; Douglas L Fraker; Giorgos C Karakousis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Is the non-sentinel lymph node compartment the next site for melanoma progression from the sentinel lymph node compartment in the regional nodal basin?

Authors:  Andrei Rios-Cantu; Ying Lu; Victor Melendez-Elizondo; Michael Chen; Alejandra Gutierrez-Range; Niloofar Fadaki; Suresh Thummala; Carla West-Coffee; James Cleaver; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; Stanley P L Leong
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  Association Between Patient Age and Lymph Node Positivity in Thin Melanoma.

Authors:  Andrew J Sinnamon; Madalyn G Neuwirth; Pratyusha Yalamanchi; Phyllis Gimotty; David E Elder; Xiaowei Xu; Rachel R Kelz; Robert E Roses; Emily Y Chu; Michael E Ming; Douglas L Fraker; Giorgos C Karakousis
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 4.  [Malignant head and neck melanoma: Part 2: Therapy].

Authors:  C Pföhler; T Vogt; C S L Müller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [Treatment of cutaneous malignant melanoma in the head and neck region : An update].

Authors:  B Frerich
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Prognosis of sentinel node staged patients with primary cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Otmar Elsaesser; Ulrike Leiter; Petra G Buettner; Thomas K Eigentler; Friedegund Meier; Benjamin Weide; Gisela Metzler; Helmut Breuninger; Claus Garbe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Stage-specific survival and recurrence in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma in Europe - a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Fernanda Costa Svedman; Demetris Pillas; Aliki Taylor; Moninder Kaur; Ragnar Linder; Johan Hansson
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.790

8.  Absence of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Is a Reproducible Predictive Factor for Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis: A Multicenter Database Study by the Brazilian Melanoma Group.

Authors:  João Pedreira Duprat; Eduard René Brechtbülh; Bianca Costa de Sá; Mauro Enokihara; Jose Humberto Fregnani; Gilles Landman; Marcus Maia; Felice Riccardi; Francisco Alberto Belfort; Alberto Wainstein; Luciana F Moredo; Higino Steck; Miguel Brandão; Marcelo Moreno; Eduardo Miranda; Ivan Dunshee de Oliveira Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  "Mitogenicity"-the latest and mosthilarious episode in the slapstick comedy of melanoma management.

Authors:  Wolfgang Weyers
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2012-07-31

10.  Prognostic factors for metastasis in cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Figueiredo Pereira Cherobin; Alberto Julius Alves Wainstein; Enrico Antônio Colosimo; Eugênio Marcos Andrade Goulart; Flávia Vasques Bittencourt
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.