Literature DB >> 28699042

Is the non-sentinel lymph node compartment the next site for melanoma progression from the sentinel lymph node compartment in the regional nodal basin?

Andrei Rios-Cantu1,2,3, Ying Lu4, Victor Melendez-Elizondo1,2,3, Michael Chen4,5, Alejandra Gutierrez-Range1,2,3, Niloofar Fadaki1, Suresh Thummala1, Carla West-Coffee1, James Cleaver6, Mohammed Kashani-Sabet1, Stanley P L Leong7.   

Abstract

Melanoma patients with additional positive lymph nodes in the completion lymph node dissection (CLND) following a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy would have a poorer prognosis than patients with no additional positive lymph nodes. We hypothesize that the progression of disease from the SLN to the non-SLN compartment is orderly and is associated with the worsening of the disease status. Thus, the SLN and non-SLN compartments are biologically different in that cancer cells, in general, arrive in the SLN compartment before spreading to the non-SLN compartment. To validate this concept, we used a large cohort of melanoma patients from our prospective SLN database in an academic tertiary medical center. Adult cutaneous melanoma patients (n = 291) undergoing CLND after a positive SLN biopsy from 1994 to 2009 were analyzed. Comparison of 5-year disease-free survival and 5-year overall survival between positive (n = 66) and negative (n = 225) CLND groups was made. The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 55% (95% CI 49-62%) for patients with no additional LN on CLND versus 14% (95% CI 8-26%) in patients with positive LN on CLND (p < 0.0001, log-rank test). The median disease-free survival time was 7.4 years with negative CLND (95% CI 4.4-15+ years) and 1.2 years with positive CLND (95% CI 1.0-1.8 years). The 5-year overall survival rates were 67% (95% CI 61-74%) for negative CLND versus 38% (95% CI 28-52%) for positive CLND (p < 0.0001, log-rank test). The median overall survival time was 12.1 years for negative CLND (95% CI 9.3-15+ years) and 2.5 years for positive CLND (95% CI 2.2-5.7 years). This study shows that CLND status is a significant prognostic factor for patients with positive SLNs undergoing CLND. Also, it suggests an orderly progression of metastasis from the SLN to the non-SLN compartment. Thus, the SLN in the regional nodal basin draining the primary melanoma may serve as an important gateway for metastasis to the non-SLN compartment and beyond to the systemic sites.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complete lymph node dissection; Cutaneous melanoma; Disease free survival; Overall survival; Sentinel lymph node biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28699042      PMCID: PMC5884118          DOI: 10.1007/s10585-017-9854-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis        ISSN: 0262-0898            Impact factor:   5.150


  44 in total

Review 1.  Overview and update of the phase III Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trials (MSLT-I and MSLT-II) in melanoma.

Authors:  Donald L Morton
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  The prognostic significance of nonsentinel lymph node metastasis in melanoma.

Authors:  Russell E Brown; Merrick I Ross; Michael J Edwards; R Dirk Noyes; Douglas S Reintgen; Lee J Hagendoorn; Arnold J Stromberg; Robert C G Martin; Kelly M McMasters; Charles R Scoggins
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Morbidity and recurrence after completion lymph node dissection following sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Merlin M Guggenheim; Urs Hug; Florian J Jung; Valentin Rousson; Matthias C Aust; Maurizio Calcagni; Walter Künzi; Pietro Giovanoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Prognostic factors associated with sentinel lymph node positivity and effect of sentinel status on survival: an analysis of 1049 patients with cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Christian Kunte; Till Geimer; Jens Baumert; Birger Konz; Matthias Volkenandt; Michael Flaig; Thomas Ruzicka; Carola Berking; Monika-H Schmid-Wendtner
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 5.  Karnofsky Memorial Lecture. Natural history of small breast cancers.

Authors:  S Hellman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Hot or not? The 10% rule in sentinel lymph node biopsy for malignant melanoma revisited.

Authors:  A D Murphy; A Britten; B Powell
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Clinicopathologic predictors of sentinel lymph node metastasis in thin melanoma.

Authors:  Dale Han; Jonathan S Zager; Yu Shyr; Heidi Chen; Lynne D Berry; Sanjana Iyengar; Mia Djulbegovic; Jaimie L Weber; Suroosh S Marzban; Vernon K Sondak; Jane L Messina; John T Vetto; Richard L White; Barbara Pockaj; Nicola Mozzillo; Kim James Charney; Eli Avisar; Robert Krouse; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; Stanley P Leong
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Prediction of non-sentinel node status and outcome in sentinel node-positive melanoma patients.

Authors:  F Roka; P Mastan; M Binder; I Okamoto; M Mittlboeck; R Horvat; H Pehamberger; E Diem
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Is complete lymph node dissection after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma always necessary? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  V Nagaraja; G D Eslick
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 4.424

10.  What is a sentinel node? Re-evaluating the 10% rule for sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma.

Authors:  Hidde M Kroon; Lori Lowe; Sandra Wong; Doug Fullen; Lyndon Su; Vincent Cimmino; Alfred E Chang; Timothy Johnson; Michael S Sabel
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 3.454

View more
  5 in total

1.  The role of sentinel node tumor burden in modeling the prognosis of melanoma patients with positive sentinel node biopsy: an Italian melanoma intergroup study (N = 2,086).

Authors:  Saveria Tropea; Paolo Del Fiore; Andrea Maurichi; Roberto Patuzzo; Mario Santinami; Simone Ribero; Pietro Quaglino; Virginia Caliendo; Lorenzo Borgognoni; Serena Sestini; Giuseppe Giudice; Eleonora Nacchiero; Corrado Caracò; Adriana Cordova; Nicola Solari; Dario Piazzalunga; Francesca Tauceri; Paolo Carcoforo; Maurizio Lombardo; Sara Cavallari; Simone Mocellin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Future perspectives: cancer metastases.

Authors:  Stanley P Leong; Jonathan S Zager
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 3.  Cancer initiation and progression within the cancer microenvironment.

Authors:  Stanley P Leong; Athena Aktipis; Carlo Maley
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 4.  Molecular mechanisms of cancer metastasis via the lymphatic versus the blood vessels.

Authors:  Stanley P Leong; Kamila Naxerova; Laura Keller; Klaus Pantel; Marlys Witte
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 5.  The lymphatic system and sentinel lymph nodes: conduit for cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Stanley P Leong; Alexander Pissas; Muriel Scarato; Francoise Gallon; Marie Helene Pissas; Miguel Amore; Max Wu; Mark B Faries; Amanda W Lund
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 5.150

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.