Literature DB >> 9751631

Frequency of prolonged remission duration after high-dose cytarabine intensification in acute myeloid leukemia varies by cytogenetic subtype.

C D Bloomfield1, D Lawrence, J C Byrd, A Carroll, M J Pettenati, R Tantravahi, S R Patil, F R Davey, D T Berg, C A Schiffer, D C Arthur, R J Mayer.   

Abstract

Advances in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have occurred with the introduction of new therapies including high-dose cytarabine and the identification of powerful prognostic factors such as cytogenetics that predict for long-term outcome. To date, the prognostic impact of cytarabine dose escalation within various cytogenetic groups of AML has not been assessed. We describe 285 newly diagnosed patients with primary AML who had adequate karyotypes and were enrolled on a prospective Cancer and Leukemia Group B cytogenetic study. All patients were randomly assigned to postremission treatment with standard-, intermediate-, or high-dose cytarabine intensification. Patients were categorized to one of three cytogenetic groups: (a) core binding factor type [(CBF); ie., t(8;21) inv(16), t(16;16), and del(16)]; (b) normal; and (c) other abnormality karyotype. An evaluation of these patients after a median follow-up time of over 7 years was performed to determine the relationship of intensification to outcome by cytogenetic group. Patients included 57 patients with CBF AML, 140 patients with normal karyotype AML, and 88 patients with other cytogenetic abnormalities. The treatment outcome of CBF AML patients was superior, with an estimated 50% still in complete remission (CR) after 5 years as compared with 32 and 15% for patients with normal karyotype AML and other abnormality AML, respectively (P < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed the following nonkaryotype factors to predict a prolonged CR duration: (a) younger age (P < 0.008); (b) lower leukocyte count (P=0.01); (c) the presence of Auer rods (P=0.004); (d) a lower percentage of bone marrow blasts (P=0.001) at the time of diagnosis, (e) and a higher postremission cytarabine dose (P < 0.001). The impact of cytarabine dose on long-term remission was most marked (P < 0.001) in the CBF AML group (after 5 years, 78% of those with a dose of 3 g/m2 were still in CR, 57% of those with a dose of 400 mg/m2 were still in CR, and 16% of those with a dose of 100 mg/m2 were still in CR) followed by normal karyotype AML (P=0.01; after 5 years, 40% of those with a dose of 3 g/m2 were still in CR, 37% of those with a dose of 400 mg/m2 were still in CR, and 20% of those with a dose of 100 mg/m2 were still in CR). In contrast, cytarabine at all doses produced only a 21% or less chance of long-term continuous CR for patients with other cytogenetic abnormalities. A multivariate analysis of CR duration assessed the independent impact of each of these variables on cure. Significant factors entering this model in descending order of importance were cytogenetic group (CBF > normal > other abnormality; P=0.00001), cytarabine dose (3 g/m2 > 400 mg/m2 > 100 mg/m2; P=0.00001), logarithm of leukocyte count at the time of diagnosis (P=0.0005), and histological subtype of AML (P=0.005). This study demonstrates that the curative impact of cytarabine intensification varies significantly among cytogenetic groups and results in a substantial prolongation of CR among patients with CBF and normal karyotypes, but not in those with other karyotypic abnormalities. These findings support the use of pretreatment cytogenetics in risk stratification of postremission AML therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9751631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  122 in total

Review 1.  The role of fluorescence in situ hybridization technologies in molecular diagnostics and disease management.

Authors:  W King; J Proffitt; L Morrison; J Piper; D Lane; S Seelig
Journal:  Mol Diagn       Date:  2000-12

2.  Acute myeloid leukemia (AML-M2) with translocation (8;21) (q22;q22) and abnormal eosinophilic precursors in the bone marrow--a case report.

Authors:  Oneal Gupta; Roopak Aggarwal; Rajni Prasad
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Haematological cancer: Gemtuzumab ozogamicin in acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Farhad Ravandi; Hagop Kantarjian
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Dynamic single-cell network profiles in acute myelogenous leukemia are associated with patient response to standard induction therapy.

Authors:  Steven M Kornblau; Mark D Minden; David B Rosen; Santosh Putta; Aileen Cohen; Todd Covey; David C Spellmeyer; Wendy J Fantl; Urte Gayko; Alessandra Cesano
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Timed sequential therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia: Results of a retrospective study of 301 patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  Kelly J Norsworthy; Amy E DeZern; Hua-Ling Tsai; Wesley A Hand; Ravi Varadhan; Steven D Gore; Ivana Gojo; Keith Pratz; Hetty E Carraway; Margaret Showel; Michael A McDevitt; Douglas Gladstone; Gabriel Ghiaur; Gabrielle Prince; Amy H Seung; Dina Benani; Mark J Levis; Judith E Karp; B Douglas Smith
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.156

Review 6.  Cytogenetics in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Claudia Schoch; Torsten Haferlach
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 7.  Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for acute myeloid leukemia: Current state in 2013 and future directions.

Authors:  Abraham S Kanate; Marcelo C Pasquini; Parameswaran N Hari; Mehdi Hamadani
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 5.326

8.  Sequential multiagent chemotherapy is not superior to high-dose cytarabine alone as postremission intensification therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in adults under 60 years of age: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 9222.

Authors:  Joseph O Moore; Stephen L George; Richard K Dodge; Philip C Amrein; Bayard L Powell; Jonathan E Kolitz; Maria R Baer; Frederick R Davey; Clara D Bloomfield; Richard A Larson; Charles A Schiffer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  Older adults with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Mikkael A Sekeres; Richard Stone
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Comparison of Mitoxantrone in Combination with Intermediate-dose Cytarabine versus High-dose Cytarabine as Consolidation Therapies for Young Non-APL Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Favorable and Intermediate Cytogenetics.

Authors:  Ji-Hao Zhou; Hai-Qing Lin; Qi Shen; Li-Na Hu; Guo-Qiang Li; Xiong-Fei Sun; Xin-You Zhang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.