Literature DB >> 18227529

Relationship between quantitative estrogen and progesterone receptor expression and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status with recurrence in the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination trial.

Mitch Dowsett1, Craig Allred, Jill Knox, Emma Quinn, Janine Salter, Chris Wale, Jack Cuzick, Joan Houghton, Norman Williams, Elizabeth Mallon, Hugh Bishop, Ian Ellis, Denis Larsimont, Hironobu Sasano, Pauline Carder, Antonio Llombart Cussac, Fiona Knox, Valerie Speirs, John Forbes, Aman Buzdar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between quantitative estrogen-receptor (ER) and progesterone-receptor (PgR) expression and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2) status with time to recurrence (TTR) in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor blocks were retrospectively collected from patients in the monotherapy arms of the Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial and centrally tested for ER, PgR and HER-2. ER and PgR were scored using continuous scales and HER-2 was scored as 0 to 3+ with 2+ cases being analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
RESULTS: Blocks were collected from 2,006 of 5,880 eligible patients. Tissue was assessable and ER and/or PgR positivity confirmed centrally in 1,782 cases. In these, TTR was longer for anastrozole than for tamoxifen by a similar extent to that in the overall trial. None of the three biomarkers identified a set of patients with differential benefit from anastrozole over tamoxifen. Patients with low ER, low PgR, and high HER-2 expression had a poorer prognosis with either drug. Only 2.6% of patients in the highest quartile of PgR experienced recurrence after 5 years, compared with 13.2% in the lowest quartile.
CONCLUSION: Quantitative expression of ER and PgR and HER-2 status did not identify patients with differential relative benefit from anastrozole over tamoxifen: TTR was longer for anastrozole than for tamoxifen in all molecular subgroups. Low ER or PgR or high HER-2 expression are associated with a high risk of recurrence with either anastrozole or tamoxifen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18227529     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  123 in total

1.  Hyperactivation of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase promotes escape from hormone dependence in estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer.

Authors:  Todd W Miller; Bryan T Hennessy; Ana M González-Angulo; Emily M Fox; Gordon B Mills; Heidi Chen; Catherine Higham; Carlos García-Echeverría; Yu Shyr; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  Mechanisms of resistance to hormonal treatment in breast cancer.

Authors:  P Eroles; A Bosch; B Bermejo; A Lluch
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Molecular basis for therapy resistance.

Authors:  Per E Lønning
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor as predictive biomarkers of response to endocrine therapy: a prospectively powered pathology study in the Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational trial.

Authors:  John M S Bartlett; Cassandra L Brookes; Tammy Robson; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Lucinda J Billingham; Fiona M Campbell; Margaret Grant; Annette Hasenburg; Elysée T M Hille; Charlene Kay; Dirk G Kieback; Hein Putter; Christos Markopoulos; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Elizabeth A Mallon; Luc Dirix; Caroline Seynaeve; Daniel Rea
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Poor-prognosis estrogen receptor- positive disease: present and future clinical solutions.

Authors:  Per E Lønning
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 6.  Does lapatinib work against HER2-negative breast cancers?

Authors:  Ingrid A Mayer; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Management of breast cancer--Part II.

Authors:  Nicholas C Turner; Alison L Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-07-11

8.  Heterogeneity of drug target expression among metastatic lesions: lessons from a breast cancer autopsy program.

Authors:  Patricia S Steeg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Therapeutic potential of the dual EGFR/HER2 inhibitor AZD8931 in circumventing endocrine resistance.

Authors:  Gladys Morrison; Xiaoyong Fu; Martin Shea; Sarmistha Nanda; Mario Giuliano; Tao Wang; Teresa Klinowska; C Kent Osborne; Mothaffar F Rimawi; Rachel Schiff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Evaluation of three commercial progesterone receptor assays in a single tamoxifen-treated breast cancer cohort.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Kornaga; Alexander C Klimowicz; Natalia Guggisberg; Travis Ogilvie; Don G Morris; Marc Webster; Anthony M Magliocco
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 7.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.