Literature DB >> 2052313

Pattern of publication of ophthalmic abstracts in peer-reviewed journals.

M S Juzych1, D H Shin, J B Coffey, K A Parrow, C S Tsai, K S Briggs.   

Abstract

Presentation of research work at scientific meetings and professional societies is an important first step toward effective scientific communication of research results. To determine the current publication patterns of abstracts, a computerized MEDLINE literature search was performed on 175 randomly selected ophthalmic clinical and basic science abstracts published in conjunction with two ophthalmic national meetings. This search revealed that 105 abstracts (60%) led to full-length articles in peer-reviewed journals within 50 to 56 months of the meeting date. A median interval of 13 months occurred from date of abstract publication to acceptance of the corresponding article. Most articles appeared within 3 years of abstract presentation. Sixty-four percent (48 of 75) of the posters and free papers presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology in November 1984 led to full-length articles, as did 57% (57 of 100) of the abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology in May 1985. These findings emphasize the preliminary nature of abstracts. The fact that nearly 60% of abstracts are published reflects favorably on the review process of both meetings.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2052313     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32256-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  17 in total

1.  Considerations and costs of disclosing study findings to research participants.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Chris Skedgel; Charles Weijer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  An observational study of duplicate presentation rates between two national orthopedic meetings.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; Victoria Patenall; P J Devereaux; Paul Tornetta; Douglas Dirschl; Pamela Leece; Thammi Ramanan; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Scientific papers presented at the European Congress of Radiology 2000: publication rates and characteristics during the period 2000-2004.

Authors:  Alberto Miguel-Dasit; Luis Martí-Bonmatí; Pilar Sanfeliu; Rafael Aleixandre
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-30       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Presentation in relation to publication of results from clinical trials.

Authors:  Aynur Unalp; Susan Tonascia; Curtis L Meinert
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Publication of surgical abstracts in full text: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  S P Balasubramanian; I D Kumar; L Wyld; M W Reed
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Attitudes of research ethics board chairs towards disclosure of research results to participants: results of a national survey.

Authors:  S Danielle MacNeil; Conrad V Fernandez
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Publication rate of abstracts presented at the shoulder and elbow session of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery.

Authors:  Philip M DeMola; Derek L Hill; Kenneth Rogers; Joseph A Abboud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Scientific meeting abstracts: significance, access, and trends.

Authors:  J A Kelly
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1998-01

9.  An 8-year longitudinal analysis of UK ophthalmic publication rates.

Authors:  A C O Okonkwo; H D J Hogg; F C Figueiredo
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Publication rates of the abstracts presented at the annual meeting of International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Murat Şakir Ekşi; Emel Ece Özcan-Ekşi
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.