Literature DB >> 20521853

Mental rotation meets the motion aftereffect: the role of hV5/MT+ in visual mental imagery.

Ruth Seurinck1, Floris P de Lange, Erik Achten, Guy Vingerhoets.   

Abstract

A growing number of studies show that visual mental imagery recruits the same brain areas as visual perception. Although the necessity of hV5/MT+ for motion perception has been revealed by means of TMS, its relevance for motion imagery remains unclear. We induced a direction-selective adaptation in hV5/MT+ by means of an MAE while subjects performed a mental rotation task that elicits imagined motion. We concurrently measured behavioral performance and neural activity with fMRI, enabling us to directly assess the effect of a perturbation of hV5/MT+ on other cortical areas involved in the mental rotation task. The activity in hV5/MT+ increased as more mental rotation was required, and the perturbation of hV5/MT+ affected behavioral performance as well as the neural activity in this area. Moreover, several regions in the posterior parietal cortex were also affected by this perturbation. Our results show that hV5/MT+ is required for imagined visual motion and engages in an interaction with parietal cortex during this cognitive process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20521853     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  Adaptive smoothing as inference strategy: more specificity for unequally sized or neighbouring regions.

Authors:  Marijke Welvaert; Karsten Tabelow; Ruth Seurinck; Yves Rosseel
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2013-10

2.  Disambiguation of Necker cube rotation by monocular and binocular depth cues: relative effectiveness for establishing long-term bias.

Authors:  Sarah J Harrison; Benjamin T Backus; Anshul Jain
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Planning Ahead: Object-Directed Sequential Actions Decoded from Human Frontoparietal and Occipitotemporal Networks.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Ingrid S Johnsrude; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Why do imagery and perception look and feel so different?

Authors:  Roger Koenig-Robert; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Hemispheric Differences within the Fronto-Parietal Network Dynamics Underlying Spatial Imagery.

Authors:  Alexander T Sack; Teresa Schuhmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-06-28

6.  Task-dependent interaction between parietal and contralateral primary motor cortex during explicit versus implicit motor imagery.

Authors:  Florent Lebon; Martin Lotze; Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Introducing Alternative-Based Thresholding for Defining Functional Regions of Interest in fMRI.

Authors:  Jasper Degryse; Ruth Seurinck; Joke Durnez; Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Peter A Bandettini; Beatrijs Moerkerke
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 8.  Neural pathways conveying novisual information to the visual cortex.

Authors:  Wen Qin; Chunshui Yu
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Effects of Stimulus Type and Strategy on Mental Rotation Network: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Tomasino; Michele Gremese
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Shared and Distinct Neural Bases of Large- and Small-Scale Spatial Ability: A Coordinate-Based Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Feng Kong; Ming Ji; Yangmei Luo; Jijun Lan; Xuqun You
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.