Literature DB >> 20515976

Pancreatic cancer: utility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in assessment of antiangiogenic therapy.

M Fatih Akisik1, Kumaresan Sandrasegaran, Guixue Bu, Chen Lin, Gary D Hutchins, Elena G Chiorean.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the utility of dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in predicting the response of locally advanced pancreatic cancer to combined chemotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study with informed consent assessed dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in 11 patients (mean age, 54.3 years; six men and five women) with locally invasive pancreatic cancer before and 28 days after combined chemotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy. Axial perfusion images were obtained after injection of 0.1 mmol gadopentetate dimeglumine per kilogram of body weight. Sagittal images of the upper abdominal aorta were obtained for arterial input function calculation. A two-compartment kinetic model was used to calculate the perfusion parameters K(trans) (the rate constant that represents transfer of contrast agent from the arterial blood into the extravascular extracellular space), K(ep) (the rate constant that represents transfer of contrast agent from the extravascular extracellular space to the blood plasma), and volume of distribution (v(e)). Semiquantitative measurements, peak tissue gadolinium concentration (C(peak)), maximum slope of gadolinium increase (slope), and area under the gadolinium curve at 60 seconds (AUC(60)) were also calculated. Perfusion parameters and tumor size changes were correlated with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels. Comparisons between pre- and posttreatment studies were performed by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, and comparisons between responders and nonresponders were performed by using the Mann-Whitney test.
RESULTS: After therapy, K(trans), v(e), C(peak), slope, and AUC(60) decreased significantly (P = .02, .001, .002, .007, and .01, respectively). Tumor size and K(ep) were not significantly changed. Pretreatment K(trans) and K(ep) were significantly higher (P = .02 and .006, respectively) in tumors that showed marker response than in those that did not. A pretreatment K(trans) value (milliliters of blood per milliliter of tissue times minutes) of more than 0.78 mL/mL . min was 100% sensitive and 71% specific for subsequent tumor response. Semiquantative parameters and tumor size were not different between the groups.
CONCLUSION: Pretreatment K(trans) measurement in pancreatic tumors can predict response to antiangiogenic therapy. All perfusion parameters showed substantial reduction after 28 days of combined chemotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20515976     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10091733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  36 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical trials of antivascular therapies.

Authors:  James P B O'Connor; Alan Jackson; Geoff J M Parker; Caleb Roberts; Gordon C Jayson
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Diagnostic evaluation of solid pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Tokar; Rohit Walia
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-10

Review 3.  New challenges in perioperative management of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Puleo; Raphaël Maréchal; Pieter Demetter; Maria-Antonietta Bali; Annabelle Calomme; Jean Closset; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Jacques Deviere; Jean-Luc Van Laethem
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Magnetization transfer MRI in pancreatic cancer xenograft models.

Authors:  Weiguo Li; Zhuoli Zhang; Jodi Nicolai; Guang-Yu Yang; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Detects Responses to Stroma-directed Therapy in Mouse Models of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jianbo Cao; Stephen Pickup; Cynthia Clendenin; Barbara Blouw; Hoon Choi; David Kang; Mark Rosen; Peter J O'Dwyer; Rong Zhou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Advances in Biomedical Imaging, Bioengineering, and Related Technologies for the Development of Biomarkers of Pancreatic Disease: Summary of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Workshop.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kelly; Michael A Hollingsworth; Randall E Brand; Christina H Liu; Vikesh K Singh; Sudhir Srivastava; Ajay D Wasan; Dhiraj Yadav; Dana K Andersen
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.327

7.  Assessment of esophageal carcinoma undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy with quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jing Lei; Qian Han; Shaocheng Zhu; Dapeng Shi; Shewei Dou; Zihua Su; Xiao Xu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Differentiating treatment-induced necrosis from recurrent/progressive brain tumor using nonmodel-based semiquantitative indices derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR perfusion.

Authors:  Jayant Narang; Rajan Jain; Ali Syed Arbab; Tom Mikkelsen; Lisa Scarpace; Mark L Rosenblum; David Hearshen; Abbas Babajani-Feremi
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Multiparametric MR imaging detects therapy efficacy of radioactive seeds brachytherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma xenografts.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Yuanjun Wang; Weiqing Tang; Mengda Jiang; Kaicheng Li; Xiaofeng Tao
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 10.  Multiparametric MR Imaging in Abdominal Malignancies.

Authors:  Antonio Luna; Shivani Pahwa; Claudio Bonini; Lidia Alcalá-Mata; Katherine L Wright; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.