Literature DB >> 21803763

Differentiating treatment-induced necrosis from recurrent/progressive brain tumor using nonmodel-based semiquantitative indices derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR perfusion.

Jayant Narang1, Rajan Jain, Ali Syed Arbab, Tom Mikkelsen, Lisa Scarpace, Mark L Rosenblum, David Hearshen, Abbas Babajani-Feremi.   

Abstract

Differentiating treatment-induced necrosis (TIN) from recurrent/progressive tumor (RPT) in brain tumor patients using conventional morphologic imaging features is a very challenging task. Functional imaging techniques also offer moderate success due to the complexity of the tissue microenvironment and the inherent limitation of the various modalities and techniques. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the utility of nonmodel-based semiquantitative indices derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR perfusion (DCET1MRP) in differentiating TIN from RPT. Twenty-nine patients with previously treated brain tumors who showed recurrent or progressive enhancing lesion on follow-up MRI underwent DCET1MRP. Another 8 patients with treatment-naive high-grade gliomas who also underwent DCET1MRP were included as the control group. Semiquantitative indices derived from DCET1MRP included maximum slope of enhancement in initial vascular phase (MSIVP), normalized MSIVP (nMSIVP), normalized slope of delayed equilibrium phase (nSDEP), and initial area under the time-intensity curve (IAUC) at 60 and 120 s (IAUC(60) and IAUC(120)) obtained from the enhancement curve. There was a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P < .01), with the RPT group showing higher MSIVP (15.78 vs 8.06), nMSIVP (0.046 vs 0.028), nIAUC(60) (33.07 vs 6.44), and nIAUC(120) (80.14 vs 65.55) compared with the TIN group. nSDEP was significantly lower in the RPT group (7.20 × 10(-5) vs 15.35 × 10(-5)) compared with the TIN group. Analysis of the receiver-operating-characteristic curve showed nMSIVP to be the best single predictor of RPT, with very high (95%) sensitivity and high (78%) specificity. Thus, nonmodel-based semiquantitative indices derived from DCET1MRP that are relatively easy to derive and do not require a complex model-based approach may aid in differentiating RPT from TIN and can be used as robust noninvasive imaging biomarkers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21803763      PMCID: PMC3158013          DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nor075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Oncol        ISSN: 1522-8517            Impact factor:   12.300


  45 in total

1.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Radiation necrosis versus glioma recurrence: conventional MR imaging clues to diagnosis.

Authors:  Mark E Mullins; Glenn D Barest; Pamela W Schaefer; Fred H Hochberg; R Gilberto Gonzalez; Michael H Lev
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Comparative study into the robustness of compartmental modeling and model-free analysis in DCE-MRI studies.

Authors:  Caleb Roberts; Basma Issa; Andrew Stone; Alan Jackson; John C Waterton; Geoffrey J M Parker
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Diffusion tensor imaging for differentiation of recurrent brain tumor and radiation necrosis after radiotherapy--three case reports.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kashimura; Takashi Inoue; Takaaki Beppu; Kuniaki Ogasawara; Akira Ogawa
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 1.876

5.  Relative cerebral blood volume values to differentiate high-grade glioma recurrence from posttreatment radiation effect: direct correlation between image-guided tissue histopathology and localized dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging measurements.

Authors:  L S Hu; L C Baxter; K A Smith; B G Feuerstein; J P Karis; J M Eschbacher; S W Coons; P Nakaji; R F Yeh; J Debbins; J E Heiserman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Serial proton MR spectroscopic imaging of recurrent malignant gliomas after gamma knife radiosurgery.

Authors:  E E Graves; S J Nelson; D B Vigneron; L Verhey; M McDermott; D Larson; S Chang; M D Prados; W P Dillon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Tumor perfusion studies using fast magnetic resonance imaging technique in advanced cervical cancer: a new noninvasive predictive assay.

Authors:  N A Mayr; W T Yuh; V A Magnotta; J C Ehrhardt; J A Wheeler; J I Sorosky; C S Davis; B C Wen; D D Martin; R E Pelsang; R E Buller; L W Oberley; D E Mellenberg; D H Hussey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Magnetic resonance perfusion and permeability imaging in brain tumors.

Authors:  Saulo Lacerda; Meng Law
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  DCE-MRI biomarkers in the clinical evaluation of antiangiogenic and vascular disrupting agents.

Authors:  J P B O'Connor; A Jackson; G J M Parker; G C Jayson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  Multimodality Brain Tumor Imaging: MR Imaging, PET, and PET/MR Imaging.

Authors:  James R Fink; Mark Muzi; Melinda Peck; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Defining the endpoints: how to measure the efficacy of drugs that are active against central nervous system metastases.

Authors:  Alessandra Fabi; Antonello Vidiri
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12

3.  Prediction of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastomas using the initial and final area under the curves ratio derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted perfusion MR imaging.

Authors:  C H Suh; H S Kim; Y J Choi; N Kim; S J Kim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  ASFNR recommendations for clinical performance of MR dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging of the brain.

Authors:  K Welker; J Boxerman; A Kalnin; T Kaufmann; M Shiroishi; M Wintermark
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  MRI biomarkers identify the differential response of glioblastoma multiforme to anti-angiogenic therapy.

Authors:  Shahrzad Jalali; Caroline Chung; Warren Foltz; Kelly Burrell; Sanjay Singh; Richard Hill; Gelareh Zadeh
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 6.  Current approaches to the treatment of metastatic brain tumours.

Authors:  Taofeek K Owonikoko; Jack Arbiser; Amelia Zelnak; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Hyunsuk Shim; Adam M Robin; Steven N Kalkanis; Timothy G Whitsett; Bodour Salhia; Nhan L Tran; Timothy Ryken; Michael K Moore; Kathleen M Egan; Jeffrey J Olson
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Which is the best advanced MR imaging protocol for predicting recurrent metastatic brain tumor following gamma-knife radiosurgery: focused on perfusion method.

Authors:  Myeong Ju Koh; Ho Sung Kim; Choong Gon Choi; Sang Joon Kim
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Evaluation of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with ferumoxytol calls RANO criteria into question.

Authors:  Morad Nasseri; Seymur Gahramanov; Joao Prola Netto; Rongwei Fu; Leslie L Muldoon; Csanad Varallyay; Bronwyn E Hamilton; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Brain Metastases Undergoing Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  J I Traylor; D C A Bastos; D Fuentes; M Muir; R Patel; V A Kumar; R J Stafford; G Rao; S S Prabhu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Radionecrosis induced by stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastases: results of surgery and outcome of disease.

Authors:  Stefano Telera; Alessandra Fabi; Andrea Pace; Antonello Vidiri; Vincenzo Anelli; Carmine Maria Carapella; Laura Marucci; Francesco Crispo; Isabella Sperduti; Alfredo Pompili
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.