PURPOSE: To systematically review and synthesize results of studies that examined the effects of exercise on persons with metastatic cancer. METHODS: Databases searched were MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Search terms used were "metastatic or advanced or palliative AND cancer or neoplasms AND exercise or physical activity or exercise therapy or physical fitness." The search identified 8 studies published in 10 articles between 2000 and 2007. Two quality-assessment tools were used, and levels of evidence were assigned according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) guidelines. RESULTS: Of the eight studies, three were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five were case series. Because three of the RCTs were based on the same sample, only one was included in the results and discussion sections. CEBM levels of evidence ranged from 2b to 4. Two overall recommendations were made, one grade A and one grade C. Exercise interventions ranged from aerobic exercise and strength training to multidimensional programmes with exercise as one component. All studies used physical and/or quality-of-life outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Review findings suggest that exercise may be beneficial for persons with metastatic cancer. Future research should clarify optimal exercise dose parameters.
PURPOSE: To systematically review and synthesize results of studies that examined the effects of exercise on persons with metastatic cancer. METHODS: Databases searched were MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Search terms used were "metastatic or advanced or palliative AND cancer or neoplasms AND exercise or physical activity or exercise therapy or physical fitness." The search identified 8 studies published in 10 articles between 2000 and 2007. Two quality-assessment tools were used, and levels of evidence were assigned according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) guidelines. RESULTS: Of the eight studies, three were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five were case series. Because three of the RCTs were based on the same sample, only one was included in the results and discussion sections. CEBM levels of evidence ranged from 2b to 4. Two overall recommendations were made, one grade A and one grade C. Exercise interventions ranged from aerobic exercise and strength training to multidimensional programmes with exercise as one component. All studies used physical and/or quality-of-life outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Review findings suggest that exercise may be beneficial for persons with metastatic cancer. Future research should clarify optimal exercise dose parameters.
Authors: Line M Oldervoll; Jon H Loge; Hanne Paltiel; May B Asp; Unni Vidvei; Marianne J Hjermstad; Stein Kaasa Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2005-12
Authors: Teresa A Rummans; Matthew M Clark; Jeff A Sloan; Marlene H Frost; John Michael Bostwick; Pamela J Atherton; Mary E Johnson; Gail Gamble; Jarrett Richardson; Paul Brown; James Martensen; Janis Miller; Katherine Piderman; Mashele Huschka; Jean Girardi; Jean Hanson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Maria I Lapid; Teresa A Rummans; Paul D Brown; Marlene H Frost; Mary E Johnson; Mashele M Huschka; Jeff A Sloan; Jarrett W Richardson; Jean M Hanson; Matthew M Clark Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2007-06
Authors: S Nicole Culos-Reed; John L Robinson; Harold Lau; Kathleein O'Connor; Melanie R Keats Journal: J Sport Exerc Psychol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 3.016
Authors: Melinda L Irwin; Ashley Wilder Smith; Anne McTiernan; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Kathy Cronin; Frank D Gilliland; Richard N Baumgartner; Kathy B Baumgartner; Leslie Bernstein Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-08-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lara Edbrooke; Linda Denehy; Catherine L Granger; Suzanne Kapp; Sanchia Aranda Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-04-13 Impact factor: 3.603