Literature DB >> 20513418

Micro- and nanomechanical analysis of articular cartilage by indentation-type atomic force microscopy: validation with a gel-microfiber composite.

Marko Loparic1, Dieter Wirz, A U Daniels, Roberto Raiteri, Mark R Vanlandingham, Geraldine Guex, Ivan Martin, Ueli Aebi, Martin Stolz.   

Abstract

As documented previously, articular cartilage exhibits a scale-dependent dynamic stiffness when probed by indentation-type atomic force microscopy (IT-AFM). In this study, a micrometer-size spherical tip revealed an unimodal stiffness distribution (which we refer to as microstiffness), whereas probing articular cartilage with a nanometer-size pyramidal tip resulted in a bimodal nanostiffness distribution. We concluded that indentation of the cartilage's soft proteoglycan (PG) gel gave rise to the lower nanostiffness peak, whereas deformation of its collagen fibrils yielded the higher nanostiffness peak. To test our hypothesis, we produced a gel-microfiber composite consisting of a chondroitin sulfate-containing agarose gel and a fibrillar poly(ethylene glycol)-terephthalate/poly(butylene)-terephthalate block copolymer. In striking analogy to articular cartilage, the microstiffness distribution of the synthetic composite was unimodal, whereas its nanostiffness exhibited a bimodal distribution. Also, similar to the case with cartilage, addition of the negatively charged chondroitin sulfate rendered the gel-microfiber composite's water content responsive to salt. When the ionic strength of the surrounding buffer solution increased from 0.15 to 2 M NaCl, the cartilage's microstiffness increased by 21%, whereas that of the synthetic biomaterial went up by 31%. When the nanostiffness was measured after the ionic strength was raised by the same amount, the cartilage's lower peak increased by 28%, whereas that of the synthetic biomaterial went up by 34%. Of interest, the higher peak values remained unchanged for both materials. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the nanoscale lower peak is a measure of the soft PG gel, and the nanoscale higher peak measures collagen fibril stiffness. In contrast, the micrometer-scale measurements fail to resolve separate stiffness values for the PG and collagen fibril moieties. Therefore, we propose to use nanostiffness as a new biomarker to analyze structure-function relationships in normal, diseased, and engineered cartilage. Copyright (c) 2010 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20513418      PMCID: PMC2877335          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  38 in total

1.  A degeneration-based hypothesis for interpreting fibrillar changes in the osteoarthritic cartilage matrix.

Authors:  N Broom; M H Chen; A Hardy
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Biomechanical properties of knee articular cartilage.

Authors:  M S Laasanen; J Töyräs; R K Korhonen; J Rieppo; S Saarakkala; M T Nieminen; J Hirvonen; J S Jurvelin
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.875

3.  Nonlinear viscoelasticity of concentrated solutions of aggrecan aggregate.

Authors:  N Meechai; A M Jamieson; J Blackwell; D A Carrino
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.988

4.  Depth-dependent compressive properties of normal aged human femoral head articular cartilage: relationship to fixed charge density.

Authors:  S S Chen; Y H Falcovitz; R Schneiderman; A Maroudas; R L Sah
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Effects of aging and dietary restriction on the structural integrity of rat articular cartilage.

Authors:  K A Athanasiou; C F Zhu; X Wang; C M Agrawal
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Individual cartilage aggrecan macromolecules and their constituent glycosaminoglycans visualized via atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Laurel Ng; Alan J Grodzinsky; Parth Patwari; John Sandy; Anna Plaas; Christine Ortiz
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.867

7.  Early detection of aging cartilage and osteoarthritis in mice and patient samples using atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Martin Stolz; Riccardo Gottardi; Roberto Raiteri; Sylvie Miot; Ivan Martin; Raphaël Imer; Urs Staufer; Aurelia Raducanu; Marcel Düggelin; Werner Baschong; A U Daniels; Niklaus F Friederich; Attila Aszodi; Ueli Aebi
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 39.213

8.  Comparison of the equilibrium response of articular cartilage in unconfined compression, confined compression and indentation.

Authors:  R K Korhonen; M S Laasanen; J Töyräs; J Rieppo; J Hirvonen; H J Helminen; J S Jurvelin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Mechanical response of bovine articular cartilage under dynamic unconfined compression loading at physiological stress levels.

Authors:  S Park; C T Hung; G A Ateshian
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 10.  Collagen of articular cartilage.

Authors:  David Eyre
Journal:  Arthritis Res       Date:  2001-10-05
View more
  45 in total

1.  Immunofluorescence-guided atomic force microscopy to measure the micromechanical properties of the pericellular matrix of porcine articular cartilage.

Authors:  Rebecca E Wilusz; Louis E DeFrate; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Bio-fabrication and physiological self-release of tissue equivalents using smart peptide amphiphile templates.

Authors:  Ricardo M Gouveia; Ian W Hamley; Che J Connon
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Poroelasticity of cartilage at the nanoscale.

Authors:  Hadi Tavakoli Nia; Lin Han; Yang Li; Christine Ortiz; Alan Grodzinsky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Decorin Regulates the Aggrecan Network Integrity and Biomechanical Functions of Cartilage Extracellular Matrix.

Authors:  Biao Han; Qing Li; Chao Wang; Pavan Patel; Sheila M Adams; Basak Doyran; Hadi T Nia; Ramin Oftadeh; Siyuan Zhou; Christopher Y Li; X Sherry Liu; X Lucas Lu; Motomi Enomoto-Iwamoto; Ling Qin; Robert L Mauck; Renato V Iozzo; David E Birk; Lin Han
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Severe Extracellular Matrix Abnormalities and Chondrodysplasia in Mice Lacking Collagen Prolyl 4-Hydroxylase Isoenzyme II in Combination with a Reduced Amount of Isoenzyme I.

Authors:  Ellinoora Aro; Antti M Salo; Richa Khatri; Mikko Finnilä; Ilkka Miinalainen; Raija Sormunen; Outi Pakkanen; Tiina Holster; Raija Soininen; Carina Prein; Hauke Clausen-Schaumann; Attila Aszódi; Juha Tuukkanen; Kari I Kivirikko; Ernestina Schipani; Johanna Myllyharju
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  [Applications of numerical simulation in musculoskeletal research and its impact on orthopedic surgery].

Authors:  D Kluess; C Hurschler; C Voigt; A Hölzer; M Stoffel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Effects of stimulated aggrecanolysis on nanoscale morphological and mechanical properties of wild-type and aggrecanase-resistant mutant mice cartilages.

Authors:  Md Hemayet Uddin; Huabin Wang; Fraser M Rogerson; Peter Vee-Sin Lee; Xuehua Zhang
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.890

8.  Keratin network modifications lead to the mechanical stiffening of the hair follicle fiber.

Authors:  Thomas Bornschlögl; Lucien Bildstein; Sébastien Thibaut; Roberto Santoprete; Françoise Fiat; Gustavo S Luengo; Jean Doucet; Bruno A Bernard; Nawel Baghdadli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Depth-dependent anisotropy of the micromechanical properties of the extracellular and pericellular matrices of articular cartilage evaluated via atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Morgan A McLeod; Rebecca E Wilusz; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  Mechanical testing of hydrogels in cartilage tissue engineering: beyond the compressive modulus.

Authors:  Yinghua Xiao; Elizabeth A Friis; Stevin H Gehrke; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 6.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.