PURPOSE: To test the ability of susceptibility weighted images (SWI) and high pass filtered phase images to localize and quantify brain iron. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance (MR) images of human cadaver brain hemispheres were collected using a gradient echo based SWI sequence at 1.5T. For X-ray fluorescence (XRF) mapping, each brain was cut to obtain slices that reasonably matched the MR images and iron was mapped at the iron K-edge at 50 or 100 microm resolution. Iron was quantified using XRF calibration foils. Phase and iron XRF were averaged within anatomic regions of one slice, chosen for its range of iron concentrations and nearly perfect anatomic correspondence. X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) was used to determine if the chemical form of iron was different in regions with poorer correspondence between iron and phase. RESULTS: Iron XRF maps, SWI, and high pass filtered phase data in nine brain slices from five subjects were visually very similar, particularly in high iron regions. The chemical form of iron could not explain poor matches. The correlation between the concentration of iron and phase in the cadaver brain was estimated as c(Fe) [microg/g tissue] = 850Deltavarpi + 110. CONCLUSION: The phase shift Deltavarpi was found to vary linearly with iron concentration with the best correspondence found in regions with high iron content.
PURPOSE: To test the ability of susceptibility weighted images (SWI) and high pass filtered phase images to localize and quantify brain iron. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance (MR) images of human cadaver brain hemispheres were collected using a gradient echo based SWI sequence at 1.5T. For X-ray fluorescence (XRF) mapping, each brain was cut to obtain slices that reasonably matched the MR images and iron was mapped at the iron K-edge at 50 or 100 microm resolution. Iron was quantified using XRF calibration foils. Phase and iron XRF were averaged within anatomic regions of one slice, chosen for its range of iron concentrations and nearly perfect anatomic correspondence. X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) was used to determine if the chemical form of iron was different in regions with poorer correspondence between iron and phase. RESULTS:Iron XRF maps, SWI, and high pass filtered phase data in nine brain slices from five subjects were visually very similar, particularly in high iron regions. The chemical form of iron could not explain poor matches. The correlation between the concentration of iron and phase in the cadaver brain was estimated as c(Fe) [microg/g tissue] = 850Deltavarpi + 110. CONCLUSION: The phase shift Deltavarpi was found to vary linearly with iron concentration with the best correspondence found in regions with high iron content.
Authors: E Mark Haacke; Norman Y C Cheng; Michael J House; Qiang Liu; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Robert J Ogg; Asadullah Khan; Muhammad Ayaz; Wolff Kirsch; Andre Obenaus Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Vivek Sehgal; Zachary Delproposto; E Mark Haacke; Karen A Tong; Nathaniel Wycliffe; Daniel K Kido; Yingbiao Xu; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Djamel Haddar; Jürgen R Reichenbach Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Limei Zhang; Josef Lichtmannegger; Karl H Summer; Samuel Webb; Ingrid J Pickering; Graham N George Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2009-02-10 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: E Mark Haacke; Muhammad Ayaz; Asadullah Khan; Elena S Manova; Bharani Krishnamurthy; Lakshman Gollapalli; Carlo Ciulla; I Kim; Floyd Petersen; Wolff Kirsch Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jens H Jensen; Kamila Szulc; Caixia Hu; Anita Ramani; Hanzhang Lu; Liang Xuan; Maria F Falangola; Ramesh Chandra; Edmond A Knopp; John Schenck; Earl A Zimmerman; Joseph A Helpern Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Andreas Schäfer; Birte U Forstmann; Jane Neumann; Sam Wharton; Alexander Mietke; Richard Bowtell; Robert Turner Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Gregory P Holmes-Hampton; Mrinmoy Chakrabarti; Allison L Cockrell; Sean P McCormick; Louise C Abbott; Lora S Lindahl; Paul A Lindahl Journal: Metallomics Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 4.526
Authors: Jongho Lee; Karin Shmueli; Byeong-Teck Kang; Bing Yao; Masaki Fukunaga; Peter van Gelderen; Sara Palumbo; Francesca Bosetti; Afonso C Silva; Jeff H Duyn Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-10-29 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jason Langley; Daniel E Huddleston; Xiangchuan Chen; Jan Sedlacik; Nishant Zachariah; Xiaoping Hu Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-02-28 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: J Hagemeier; B Weinstock-Guttman; N Bergsland; M Heininen-Brown; E Carl; C Kennedy; C Magnano; D Hojnacki; M G Dwyer; R Zivadinov Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-03-29 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Y Yao; T D Nguyen; S Pandya; Y Zhang; S Hurtado Rúa; I Kovanlikaya; A Kuceyeski; Z Liu; Y Wang; S A Gauthier Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 3.825