Literature DB >> 22552615

Comparison of femoral tunnel length between transportal and retrograde reaming outside-in techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Jae Gyoon Kim1, Joon Ho Wang, Jin Hwan Ahn, Hak Jun Kim, Hong Chul Lim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of intraoperative femoral tunnel length measurement and to compare this between the transportal (TP) and outside-in (OI) techniques for double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
METHODS: Eighty patients underwent a DB ACL reconstruction using either the TP or the OI technique. The participants were randomized to either a TP group (I, 40 cases) or a OI group (II, 40 cases). The intraoperatively measured femoral tunnel length was recorded, and the postoperative femoral tunnel length was measured using computed tomography with OsiriX(®) imaging software.
RESULTS: The mean femoral tunnel lengths measured intraoperatively in Group II (38.9 ± 3.0 mm for anteromedial [AM], 39.3 ± 3.4 mm for posterolateral [PL]) were significantly longer than those of Group I (34.8 ± 2.7 mm for AM, 36.0 ± 3.2 mm for PL) (P < 0.001). The mean AM femoral tunnel length measured postoperatively in Group II (33.3 ± 3.8 mm) was significantly longer than that in Group I (31.1 ± 2.9 mm) (P = 0.006). The mean intraoperatively measured femoral tunnel length was significantly longer than that measured postoperatively in Groups I and II (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: After anatomic DB ACL reconstruction, the femoral tunnel length of the OI technique measured intraoperatively (AM/PL) and postoperatively (AM) was longer than those of the TP technique. The femoral tunnel length measured intraoperatively was longer than that measured postoperatively in both TP and OI technique. This study may help surgeons to measure femoral tunnel length accurately in anatomic DB ACL reconstruction with suspensory fixation device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22552615     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2024-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  30 in total

1.  Tendon healing in a bone tunnel. Part II: Histologic analysis after biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep.

Authors:  Andreas Weiler; Reinhard F G Hoffmann; Hermann J Bail; Oliver Rehm; Norbert P Südkamp
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Dropping of an EndoButton into the knee joint 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament repair using proximal fixation methods.

Authors:  Ibrahim Yanmiş; Servet Tunay; Erbil Oğuz; Cemil Yildiz; Hüseyin Ozkan; Vecihi Kirdemir
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Volker Musahl; Volker Steuber; Daniel Kendoff; Dan Choi; Answorth A Allen; Andrew D Pearle; David W Altchek
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel length: cadaveric analysis comparing anteromedial portal versus outside-in technique.

Authors:  James H Lubowitz; John Konicek
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Do broken cross-pins compromise stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendons?

Authors:  Nam-Hong Choi; Jung-Hoon Lee; Brian N Victoroff
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized computed tomography--based study comparing 2 different femoral fixation methods for hamstring graft.

Authors:  Dhananjaya Sabat; Kundan Kundu; Sumit Arora; Vinod Kumar
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: can anatomic femoral placement be achieved with a transtibial technique?

Authors:  Dana P Piasecki; Bernard R Bach; Alejandro A Espinoza Orias; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Endobutton button endoscopic fixation technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  G R Barrett; L Papendick; C Miller
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Stability results of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2- to 8-year follow-up.

Authors:  Chadwick C Prodromos; Yung S Han; Brett L Keller; Richelle J Bolyard
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Mario Ferretti; Max Ekdahl; Wei Shen; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  10 in total

1.  Comparison of tunnel variability between trans-portal and outside-in techniques in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Jae-Ang Sim; Jong-Min Kim; Sahnghoon Lee; Ji-Yong Bae; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison of femoral tunnel widening between outside-in and trans-tibial double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Yong Seuk Lee; Beom Koo Lee; Won Seok Oh; Yong Kyun Cho
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Effects of femoral bone tunnel characteristics on graft-bending angle in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the outside-in and transportal techniques.

Authors:  Yasuo Niki; Katsuya Nagai; Kengo Harato; Yasunori Suda; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Contact area between femoral tunnel and interference screw in anatomic rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction: a comparison of outside-in and trans-portal inside-out techniques.

Authors:  Kunihiko Hiramatsu; Tatsuo Mae; Yuta Tachibana; Shigeto Nakagawa; Konsei Shino
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  One-incision versus two-incision techniques for arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adults.

Authors:  Fernando C Rezende; Vinícius Y Moraes; Carlos Es Franciozi; Pedro Debieux; Marcus V Luzo; João Carlos Belloti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-12-15

6.  Length of the femoral tunnel in anatomic ACL reconstruction: comparison of three techniques.

Authors:  Marko Kadija; Darko Milovanović; Marko Bumbaširević; Zvonko Carević; Emilija Dubljanin-Raspopović; Lazar Stijak
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  In vitro comparison between cortical and cortico-cancellous femoral suspension devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: implications for mobilization.

Authors:  Cristina Rodríguez; Tomás Eduardo García; Susana Montes; Luis Rodríguez; Antonio Maestro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Anteromedial Portal Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Yields Similar Outcomes to Non-AMP Femoral Drilling Double-Bundle Techniques: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Tushar Tejpal; Arnav Gupta; Ajaykumar Shanmugaraj; Nolan S Horner; Nicole Simunovic; Devin C Peterson; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-12-11

9.  Comparison of Outcomes of Two Femoral Fixation Devices in Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Sánchez-Carrasco; Juan Francisco Abellán; Salima Qudsi-Sinclair; Guadalupe Ruiz-Merino; Francisco Javier Carrillo-Juliá; David Bo-Rueda
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 10.  Transportal versus all-inside techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rohan Bhimani; Reza Shahriarirad; Keivan Ranjbar; Amirhossein Erfani; Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.359

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.