OBJECTIVE: To determine whether training in coping strategies will improve psychologic functioning and self-efficacy in survivors of brain injury (BI) and caregivers. DESIGN: Randomized controlled pilot study with measurements at baseline, postintervention, and 3-month follow-up. SETTING: Postacute rehabilitation clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Survivors of BI (n=20) and caregivers (n=20). INTERVENTIONS: The Brain Injury Coping Skills Group is a 12-session, manualized, cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) group providing psychoeducation, support, and coping skills training. Effects of this preventative intervention were examined on emotional functioning and perceived self-efficacy (PSE). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) and Brain InjuryCoping Skills Questionnaire. RESULTS: Analyses revealed that the Brain Injury Coping Skills group showed significantly improved PSE compared with the control group immediately posttreatment (F=14.16; P=.001) and maintained this over time. PSE assessed posttreatment predicted global distress at 3-month follow-up across groups (rho=-.46). No differences between treatment and control groups were apparent on the BSI-18 posttreatment. However, the control group showed increased emotional distress at 3-month follow-up while the Brain Injury Coping Skills group remained stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: Few CBT studies have included survivors of BI and caregivers together in group treatment or included a control group. No prior studies have examined the role of PSE specifically. Prior intervention studies show inconsistent effects on emotional functioning, raising questions regarding the role of intervening variables. This study offers a new conceptualization that PSE may moderate longer-term emotional adjustment after brain injury. Results indicate that PSE is an important and modifiable factor in helping persons better adjust to BI. Copyright 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether training in coping strategies will improve psychologic functioning and self-efficacy in survivors of brain injury (BI) and caregivers. DESIGN: Randomized controlled pilot study with measurements at baseline, postintervention, and 3-month follow-up. SETTING: Postacute rehabilitation clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Survivors of BI (n=20) and caregivers (n=20). INTERVENTIONS: The Brain Injury Coping Skills Group is a 12-session, manualized, cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) group providing psychoeducation, support, and coping skills training. Effects of this preventative intervention were examined on emotional functioning and perceived self-efficacy (PSE). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) and Brain Injury Coping Skills Questionnaire. RESULTS: Analyses revealed that the Brain Injury Coping Skills group showed significantly improved PSE compared with the control group immediately posttreatment (F=14.16; P=.001) and maintained this over time. PSE assessed posttreatment predicted global distress at 3-month follow-up across groups (rho=-.46). No differences between treatment and control groups were apparent on the BSI-18 posttreatment. However, the control group showed increased emotional distress at 3-month follow-up while the Brain Injury Coping Skills group remained stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: Few CBT studies have included survivors of BI and caregivers together in group treatment or included a control group. No prior studies have examined the role of PSE specifically. Prior intervention studies show inconsistent effects on emotional functioning, raising questions regarding the role of intervening variables. This study offers a new conceptualization that PSE may moderate longer-term emotional adjustment after brain injury. Results indicate that PSE is an important and modifiable factor in helping persons better adjust to BI. Copyright 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Tessa Hart; Simon Driver; Angelle Sander; Monique Pappadis; Kristen Dams-O'Connor; Claire Bocage; Emma Hinkens; Marie N Dahdah; Xinsheng Cai Journal: Brain Inj Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Flora M Hammond; Ryan Barrett; Marcel P Dijkers; Jeanne M Zanca; Susan D Horn; Randall J Smout; Tami Guerrier; Elizabeth Hauser; Megan R Dunning Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Lori A Mitchell; John Hirdes; Jeff W Poss; Caroline Slegers-Boyd; Hilary Caldarelli; Lynn Martin Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Marieke M Visser; Majanka H Heijenbrok-Kal; Adriaan van 't Spijker; Gerard M Ribbers; Jan J V Busschbach Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2013-06-27 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Pernille Langer Soendergaard; Mia Moth Wolffbrandt; Fin Biering-Sørensen; Malin Nordin; Trine Schow; Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla; Anne Norup Journal: Trials Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 2.279