Natalie Kreitzer1, Brad G Kurowski2, Tamilyn Bakas3. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States; Division of Neurocritical Care, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States. Electronic address: kreitzne@ucmail.uc.edu. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States. 3. College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe and synthesize the literature on adult traumatic brain injury (TBI) family caregiver and dyad intervention. TBI is a common injury that has a significant long-term impact, and is sometimes even characterized as a chronic condition. Informal (ie, unpaid) family caregivers of adults with TBI experience high rates of burnout, depression, fatigue, anxiety, lower subjective well-being, and poorer levels of physical health compared to noncaregivers. This study addresses the critical gap in the understanding of interventions designed to address the impact of TBI on adult patients and their family caregivers. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and MEDLINE. STUDY SELECTION: Studies selected for review had to be written in English and be quasi-experimental or experimental in design, report on TBI caregivers, survivors with heavy involvement of caregivers, or caregiver dyads, involve moderate and severe TBI, and describe an intervention implemented during some portion of the TBI care continuum. DATA EXTRACTION: The search identified 2171 articles, of which 14 met our criteria for inclusion. Of the identified studies, 10 were randomized clinical trials and 4 were nonrandomized quasi-experimental studies. A secondary search to describe studies that included individuals with other forms of acquired brain injury in addition to TBI resulted in 852 additional titles, of which 5 met our inclusion criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: Interventions that targeted the caregiver primarily were more likely to provide benefit than those that targeted caregiver/survivor dyad or the survivor only. Many of the studies were limited by poor fidelity, low sample sizes, and high risk for bias based on randomization techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Future studies of TBI caregivers should enroll a more generalizable number of participants and ensure adequate fidelity to properly compare interventions.
OBJECTIVE: To describe and synthesize the literature on adult traumatic brain injury (TBI) family caregiver and dyad intervention. TBI is a common injury that has a significant long-term impact, and is sometimes even characterized as a chronic condition. Informal (ie, unpaid) family caregivers of adults with TBI experience high rates of burnout, depression, fatigue, anxiety, lower subjective well-being, and poorer levels of physical health compared to noncaregivers. This study addresses the critical gap in the understanding of interventions designed to address the impact of TBI on adult patients and their family caregivers. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and MEDLINE. STUDY SELECTION: Studies selected for review had to be written in English and be quasi-experimental or experimental in design, report on TBI caregivers, survivors with heavy involvement of caregivers, or caregiver dyads, involve moderate and severe TBI, and describe an intervention implemented during some portion of the TBI care continuum. DATA EXTRACTION: The search identified 2171 articles, of which 14 met our criteria for inclusion. Of the identified studies, 10 were randomized clinical trials and 4 were nonrandomized quasi-experimental studies. A secondary search to describe studies that included individuals with other forms of acquired brain injury in addition to TBI resulted in 852 additional titles, of which 5 met our inclusion criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: Interventions that targeted the caregiver primarily were more likely to provide benefit than those that targeted caregiver/survivor dyad or the survivor only. Many of the studies were limited by poor fidelity, low sample sizes, and high risk for bias based on randomization techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Future studies of TBI caregivers should enroll a more generalizable number of participants and ensure adequate fidelity to properly compare interventions.
Authors: Shari L Wade; Brad G Kurowski; Michael W Kirkwood; Nanhua Zhang; Amy Cassedy; Tanya M Brown; Britt Nielsen; Terry Stancin; H Gerry Taylor Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kathleen R Bell; Jo Ann Brockway; Tessa Hart; John Whyte; Mark Sherer; Robert T Fraser; Nancy R Temkin; Sureyya S Dikmen Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Tamilyn Bakas; Patricia C Clark; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Rosemarie B King; Barbara J Lutz; Elaine L Miller Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: T C Hoffmann; P P Glasziou; I Boutron; R Milne; R Perera; D Moher; D G Altman; V Barbour; H Macdonald; M Johnston; S E Lamb; M Dixon-Woods; P McCulloch; J C Wyatt; A-W Chan; S Michie Journal: Gesundheitswesen Date: 2016-01-29
Authors: Jason H Raad; David S Tulsky; Rael T Lange; Tracey A Brickell; Angelle M Sander; Robin A Hanks; Louis French; Jennifer A Miner; Pamela A Kisala; Noelle E Carlozzi Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2020-04-18 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Pernille Langer Soendergaard; Mia Moth Wolffbrandt; Fin Biering-Sørensen; Malin Nordin; Trine Schow; Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla; Anne Norup Journal: Trials Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Kirsten Lieshout; Joanne Oates; Anne Baker; Carolyn A Unsworth; Ian D Cameron; Julia Schmidt; Natasha A Lannin Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 3.390