Literature DB >> 20510445

The dependence of MG63 osteoblast responses to (meth)acrylate-based networks on chemical structure and stiffness.

Kathryn E Smith1, Sharon L Hyzy, Moonhae Sunwoo, Ken A Gall, Zvi Schwartz, Barbara D Boyan.   

Abstract

The cell response to an implant is regulated by the implant's surface properties including topography and chemistry, but less is known about how the mechanical properties affect cell behavior. The objective of this study was to evaluate how the surface stiffness and chemistry of acrylate-based copolymer networks affect the in vitro response of human MG63 pre-osteoblast cells. Networks comprised of poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate (PEGDMA; Mn approximately 750) and diethylene glycol dimethacrylate (DEGDMA) were photopolymerized at different concentrations to produce three compositions with moduli ranging from 850 to 60 MPa. To further decouple chemistry and stiffness, three networks comprised of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2HEMA) and PEGDMA or DEGDMA were also designed that exhibited a range of moduli similar to the PEGDMA-DEGDMA networks. MG63 cells were cultured on each surface and tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS), and the effect of copolymer composition on cell number, osteogenic markers (alkaline phosphatase specific activity and osteocalcin), and local growth factor production (OPG, TGF-beta1, and VEGF-A) were assessed. Cells exhibited a more differentiated phenotype on the PEGDMA-DEGDMA copolymers compared to the 2HEMA-PEGDMA copolymers. On the PEGDMA-DEGDMA system, cells exhibited a more differentiated phenotype on the stiffest surface indicated by elevated osteocalcin compared with TCPS. Conversely, cells on 2HEMA-PEGDMA copolymers became more differentiated on the less stiff 2HEMA surface. Growth factors were regulated in a differential manner. These results indicate that copolymer chemistry is the primary regulator of osteoblast differentiation, and the effect of stiffness is secondary to the surface chemistry. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20510445      PMCID: PMC2896827          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  40 in total

1.  Transdermal photopolymerization for minimally invasive implantation.

Authors:  J Elisseeff; K Anseth; D Sims; W McIntosh; M Randolph; R Langer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Microstructural elasticity and regional heterogeneity in human femoral bone of various ages examined by nano-indentation.

Authors:  J Y Rho; P Zioupos; J D Currey; G M Pharr
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants.

Authors:  Dehua Li; Stephen J Ferguson; Thomas Beutler; David L Cochran; Caroline Sittig; Hans Peter Hirt; Daniel Buser
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2002-05

4.  Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells onto polycarbonate membrane surfaces with different micropore sizes.

Authors:  Sang Jin Lee; Jin San Choi; Ki Suk Park; Gilson Khang; Young Moo Lee; Hai Bang Lee
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  The effect of hydrogel charge density on cell attachment.

Authors:  Galen B Schneider; Anthony English; Matthew Abraham; Rebecca Zaharias; Clark Stanford; John Keller
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs.

Authors:  D Buser; R K Schenk; S Steinemann; J P Fiorellini; C H Fox; H Stich
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1991-07

7.  The effect of cure rate on the mechanical properties of dental resins.

Authors:  L G Lovell; H Lu; J E Elliott; J W Stansbury; C N Bowman
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Screening of photochemically grafted polymer films for compatibility with osteogenic precursor cells.

Authors:  Nina Adden; Andrea Hoffmann; Gerhard Gross; Henning Windhagen; Fritz Thorey; Henning Menzel
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.517

9.  Evaluation of VEGF-mediated signaling in primary human cells reveals a paracrine action for VEGF in osteoblast-mediated crosstalk to endothelial cells.

Authors:  Claire E Clarkin; Roger J Emery; Andrew A Pitsillides; Caroline P D Wheeler-Jones
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.384

10.  The regulation of osteogenesis by ECM rigidity in MC3T3-E1 cells requires MAPK activation.

Authors:  Chirag B Khatiwala; Shelly R Peyton; Mark Metzke; Andrew J Putnam
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.384

View more
  16 in total

1.  Degradable segmented polyurethane elastomers for bone tissue engineering: effect of polycaprolactone content.

Authors:  Katherine D Kavlock; Kyumin Whang; Scott A Guelcher; Aaron S Goldstein
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.517

2.  Sensing and modulation of invadopodia across a wide range of rigidities.

Authors:  Aron Parekh; Nazanin S Ruppender; Kevin M Branch; M K Sewell-Loftin; Jun Lin; Patrick D Boyer; Joseph E Candiello; W David Merryman; Scott A Guelcher; Alissa M Weaver
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Osteoblasts exhibit a more differentiated phenotype and increased bone morphogenetic protein production on titanium alloy substrates than on poly-ether-ether-ketone.

Authors:  Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Rolando A Gittens; Jennifer M Schneider; Sharon L Hyzy; David A Haithcock; Peter F Ullrich; Zvi Schwartz; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 4.  3D Printing of Tissue Engineered Constructs for In Vitro Modeling of Disease Progression and Drug Screening.

Authors:  Joseph Vanderburgh; Julie A Sterling; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Marrow-derived stem cell motility in 3D synthetic scaffold is governed by geometry along with adhesivity and stiffness.

Authors:  Shelly R Peyton; Z Ilke Kalcioglu; Joshua C Cohen; Anne P Runkle; Krystyn J Van Vliet; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Linda G Griffith
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Decoupling the effects of nanopore size and surface roughness on the attachment, spreading and differentiation of bone marrow-derived stem cells.

Authors:  Jing Xia; Yuan Yuan; Huayin Wu; Yuting Huang; David A Weitz
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Fabrication of 3D Scaffolds with Precisely Controlled Substrate Modulus and Pore Size by Templated-Fused Deposition Modeling to Direct Osteogenic Differentiation.

Authors:  Ruijing Guo; Sichang Lu; Jonathan M Page; Alyssa R Merkel; Sandip Basu; Julie A Sterling; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 9.933

8.  Substrate Modulus Regulates Osteogenic Differentiation of Rat Mesenchymal Stem Cells through Integrin β1 and BMP Receptor Type IA.

Authors:  R Guo; S Lu; A R Merkel; J A Sterling; S A Guelcher
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 6.331

9.  The influence of elasticity and surface roughness on myogenic and osteogenic-differentiation of cells on silk-elastin biomaterials.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Sang-Hyug Park; Eun Seok Gil; Xiao-Xia Xia; Anthony S Weiss; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Fabrication of Trabecular Bone-Templated Tissue-Engineered Constructs by 3D Inkjet Printing.

Authors:  Joseph P Vanderburgh; Shanik J Fernando; Alyssa R Merkel; Julie A Sterling; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 9.933

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.