Literature DB >> 14967535

The effect of hydrogel charge density on cell attachment.

Galen B Schneider1, Anthony English, Matthew Abraham, Rebecca Zaharias, Clark Stanford, John Keller.   

Abstract

The competitive growth patterns of osteoblasts and fibroblasts can determine if healthy bone or pathologic scar tissue is formed at a wound site. Cell interactions with various alloplastic biomaterials used for tissue-engineering applications is complex. Defined synthetic mediums are valuable for studying ionic and cell receptor-specific interactions. The objectives of this study were to determine if fibroblasts and osteoblasts differentially attached to HEMA and PEG hydrogels copolymerized with positive, negative, or neutral charge densities, or when grafted with specific integrin receptor RGD adhesion ligand. Cytoskeletal phenotypes were assessed with immunofluorescent microscopy and cell attachment assays. Osteoblast cell attachment to both HEMA and PEG hydrogels was significantly higher (P<0.01) as compared to fibroblast cells. Positively charged HEMA and PEG hydrogels supported the greatest cell attachment, followed by RGD grafted, negative, and neutral charge densities, respectively. Each of these conditions elicited nearly a two-fold increase in osteoblast cell attachment, as compared to fibroblasts. Cell attachment to serum-coated coverslips was used as the control. Immunofluorescent analysis showed that both cell types attached and spread better on the positively charged hydrogels. However, fibroblasts demonstrated less spreading as compared to osteoblasts. In conclusion, differences in hydrophilic properties differentially affect osteoblast and fibroblast cell attachment and spreading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14967535     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  43 in total

1.  Acrylic scaffolds with interconnected spherical pores and controlled hydrophilicity for tissue engineering.

Authors:  R Brígido Diego; M Pérez Olmedilla; A Serrano Aroca; J L Gómez Ribelles; M Monleón Pradas; G Gallego Ferrer; M Salmerón Sánchez
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Stimulation of neurite outgrowth using positively charged hydrogels.

Authors:  Mahrokh Dadsetan; Andrew M Knight; Lichun Lu; Anthony J Windebank; Michael J Yaszemski
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Surface modification of hydrogels based on poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) with extracellular matrix proteins.

Authors:  Eduard Brynda; Milan Houska; Jirí Kysilka; Martin Prádný; Petr Lesný; Pavla Jendelová; Jirí Michálek; Eva Syková
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  A New Crosslinkable Oxygen Sensor Covalently Bonded into Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)-CO-Polyacrylamide Thin Film for Dissolved Oxygen Sensing.

Authors:  Yanqing Tian; Bradley R Shumway; Deirdre R Meldrum
Journal:  Chem Mater       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 9.811

5.  Development of a Dual-Functional Hydrogel Using RGD and Anti-VEGF Aptamer.

Authors:  Nan Zhao; Mark R Battig; Ming Xu; Xiuli Wang; Na Xiong; Yong Wang
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.979

6.  Self-Cleaning, Thermoresponsive P (NIPAAm-co-AMPS) Double Network Membranes for Implanted Glucose Biosensors.

Authors:  Ruochong Fei; A Kristen Means; Alexander A Abraham; Andrea K Locke; Gerard L Coté; Melissa A Grunlan
Journal:  Macromol Mater Eng       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.367

7.  Potential of hydrogels based on poly(ethylene glycol) and sebacic acid as orthopedic tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Jinku Kim; Theresa E Hefferan; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Iterative design of peptide-based hydrogels and the effect of network electrostatics on primary chondrocyte behavior.

Authors:  Chomdao Sinthuvanich; Lisa A Haines-Butterick; Katelyn J Nagy; Joel P Schneider
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Noneluting enzymatic antibiofilm coatings.

Authors:  Svetlana V Pavlukhina; Jeffrey B Kaplan; Li Xu; Wei Chang; Xiaojun Yu; Srinivasa Madhyastha; Nandadeva Yakandawala; Almagul Mentbayeva; Babar Khan; Svetlana A Sukhishvili
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 9.229

10.  Effect of surfactant types on the biocompatibility of electrospun HAp/PHBV composite nanofibers.

Authors:  A Suslu; A Z Albayrak; A S Urkmez; E Bayir; U Cocen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.