Literature DB >> 25983382

Communication Efficacy and Couples' Cancer Management: Applying a Dyadic Appraisal Model.

Kate Magsamen-Conrad1, Maria G Checton2, Maria K Venetis3, Kathryn Greene4.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to apply Berg and Upchurch's (2007) developmental-conceptual model to understand better how couples cope with cancer. Specifically, we hypothesized a dyadic appraisal model in which proximal factors (relational quality), dyadic appraisal (prognosis uncertainty), and dyadic coping (communication efficacy) predicted adjustment (cancer management). The study was cross-sectional and included 83 dyads in which one partner had been diagnosed with and/or treated for cancer. For both patients and partners, multilevel analyses using the actor-partner interdependence model (APIM) indicated that proximal contextual factors predicted dyadic appraisal and dyadic coping. Dyadic appraisal predicted dyadic coping, which then predicted dyadic adjustment. Patients' confidence in their ability to talk about the cancer predicted their own cancer management. Partners' confidence predicted their own and the patient's ability to cope with cancer, which then predicted patients' perceptions of their general health. Implications and future research are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Chronic Illness; Communication; Couples; Dyadic Coping; Efficacy

Year:  2015        PMID: 25983382      PMCID: PMC4430110          DOI: 10.1080/03637751.2014.971415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Monogr        ISSN: 0363-7751


  29 in total

1.  Assessing health diagnosis disclosure decisions in relationships: testing the disclosure decision-making model.

Authors:  Kathryn Greene; Kate Magsamen-Conrad; Maria K Venetis; Maria G Checton; Zhanna Bagdasarov; Smita C Banerjee
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2011-10-12

2.  Gender-related needs and preferences in cancer care indicate the need for an individualized approach to cancer patients.

Authors:  Hester Wessels; Alexander de Graeff; Klaske Wynia; Miriam de Heus; Cas L J J Kruitwagen; Gerda T G J Woltjer; Saskia C C M Teunissen; Emile E Voest
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-05-27

3.  Experimental disclosure and its moderators: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joanne Frattaroli
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Collaborative coping and daily mood in couples dealing with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Cynthia A Berg; Deborah J Wiebe; Jonathan Butner; Lindsey Bloor; Chester Bradstreet; Renn Upchurch; John Hayes; Robert Stephenson; Lillian Nail; Gregory Patton
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-09

5.  Facilitating patient-centered cancer communication: a road map.

Authors:  Neeraj K Arora; Richard L Street; Ronald M Epstein; Phyllis N Butow
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-12

6.  The rupture and repair of the couple's communal body with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Karen D Fergus
Journal:  Fam Syst Health       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.950

7.  Coping together and apart: exploring how patients and their caregivers manage terminal head and neck cancer.

Authors:  K R Foxwell; S E Scott
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2011

8.  Decision making in cancer-related topic avoidance.

Authors:  Maria K Venetis; Kathryn Greene; Maria G Checton; Kate Magsamen-Conrad
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-01-13

9.  Distressed partners and caregivers do not recover easily: adjustment trajectories among partners and caregivers of cancer survivors.

Authors:  Sylvie D Lambert; Bobby L Jones; Afaf Girgis; Christophe Lecathelinais
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2012-10

10.  Dyadic concordance among prostate cancer patients and their partners and health-related quality of life: does it matter?

Authors:  Erin L Merz; Vanessa L Malcarne; Celine M Ko; Melody Sadler; Lisa Kwack; James W Varni; Georgia Robins Sadler
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2011-07-11
View more
  7 in total

1.  The Role of Response Perceptions in Couples' Ongoing Cancer-Related Disclosure.

Authors:  Kate Magsamen-Conrad; Maria K Venetis; Maria G Checton; Kathryn Greene
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2018-03-22

2.  Psychosocial Distress in Women With Breast Cancer and Their Partners and Its Impact on Supportive Care Needs in Partners.

Authors:  Ute Goerling; Corinna Bergelt; Volkmar Müller; Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-09-23

3.  Planning a Stigmatized Nonvisible Illness Disclosure: Applying the Disclosure Decision-Making Model.

Authors:  Soe Yoon Choi; Maria K Venetis; Kathryn Greene; Kate Magsamen-Conrad; Maria G Checton; Smita C Banerjee
Journal:  J Psychol       Date:  2016-09-23

4.  Online Health-Information Seeking Among Older Populations: Family Influences and the Role of the Medical Professional.

Authors:  Kate Magsamen-Conrad; Jeanette M Dillon; China Billotte Verhoff; Sandra L Faulkner
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2018-02-23

Review 5.  The Dyadic Cancer Outcomes Framework: A general framework of the effects of cancer on patients and informal caregivers.

Authors:  Tess Thompson; Dana Ketcher; Tamryn F Gray; Erin E Kent
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Dyadic coping and its association with emotional functioning in couples confronted with advanced cancer: Results of the multicenter observational eQuiPe study.

Authors:  Janneke van Roij; Natasja Raijmakers; Jeroen Kloover; Evelien Kuip; Tineke Smilde; Lilly-Ann van der Velden; Gary Rodin; Lonneke van de Poll-Franse
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.955

7.  Blood cancer caregiving during COVID-19: understanding caregivers' needs.

Authors:  Carla L Fisher; Kevin B Wright; Chelsea N Hampton; Taylor S Vasquez; Amanda Kastrinos; Allison J Applebaum; Maria Sae-Hau; Elisa S Weiss; Greg Lincoln; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.046

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.