Literature DB >> 20503457

Clinicopathologic significance of slug expression in human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Ke-Jun Zhang1, Bing-Yuan Zhang, Kun-Peng Zhang, Li-Min Tang, Shi-Song Liu, Dong-Ming Zhu, Dian-Liang Zhang.   

Abstract

AIM: To explore the expression and function of slug, a transcriptional repressor, in human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) and identify its role in IHCC progression.
METHODS: Expression of slug was detected in 36 cases of IHCC and 12 cases of normal intrahepatic bile ducts and liver parenchyma by immunohistochemistry. The patients were divided into low slug expression group (< 20% of carcinoma cells stained) and high slug expression group (> or = 20% of carcinoma cells stained). Slug expression was correlated with clinicopathological parameters of IHCC patients. The patients were defined as short-term survivors if their survival time was < 12 mo and as long-term survivors if their survival time was > or = 12 mo.
RESULTS: Slug was not expressed in normal liver epithelium samples, lowly expressed in 15 tissue samples (10 -, 5 +) and highly expressed in 21 tissue samples (16 ++; 5 +++) from IHCC patients. The survival rate of patients with a low slug expression was 33.3% (n = 5) and 66.7% (n = 10), respectively. The survival rate of patients with a high slug expression was 61.9% (n = 13) and 38.1% (n = 8), respectively (P = 0.02). Lymph node metastasis was found in 4 (26.7%) out of the 15 patients with a low slug expression and in 14 (66.7%) out of the 21 patients with a high slug expression, respectively. The incidence rate of lymph node metastasis increased with the increasing slug expression level (P = 0.003), and higher in patients with a high slug expression than in those with a low slug expression. Slug expression did not significantly correlate with the tumor size and stage or histologic grade, or with the gender and age of patients
CONCLUSION: Slug expression is a novel prognostic marker for IHCC with lymph node metastasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20503457      PMCID: PMC2877187          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i20.2554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  22 in total

1.  The transcription factor Slug represses E-cadherin expression and induces epithelial to mesenchymal transitions: a comparison with Snail and E47 repressors.

Authors:  Victoria Bolós; Hector Peinado; Mirna A Pérez-Moreno; Mario F Fraga; Manel Esteller; Amparo Cano
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Evolutionary history of the Snail/Scratch superfamily.

Authors:  Alejandro Barrallo-Gimeno; M Angela Nieto
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 3.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a worthy challenge.

Authors:  David L Bartlett
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

4.  The SLUG zinc-finger protein represses E-cadherin in breast cancer.

Authors:  Karen M Hajra; David Y-S Chen; Eric R Fearon
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Snail and Slug are major determinants of ovarian cancer invasiveness at the transcription level.

Authors:  N K Kurrey; Amit K; S A Bapat
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  The melanocyte differentiation program predisposes to metastasis after neoplastic transformation.

Authors:  Piyush B Gupta; Charlotte Kuperwasser; Jean-Philippe Brunet; Sridhar Ramaswamy; Wen-Lin Kuo; Joe W Gray; Stephen P Naber; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-09-04       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Expression of the transcription factors snail, slug, and twist and their clinical significance in human breast cancer.

Authors:  Tracey A Martin; Amit Goyal; Gareth Watkins; Wen G Jiang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  SLUG in cancer development.

Authors:  Pedro Antonio Pérez-Mancera; Inés González-Herrero; María Pérez-Caro; Noelia Gutiérrez-Cianca; Teresa Flores; Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán; Belén Pintado; Manuel Sánchez-Martín; Isidro Sánchez-García
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Slug Expression in the E-cadherin preserved tumors is related to prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yasuto Uchikado; Shoji Natsugoe; Hiroshi Okumura; Tetsuro Setoyama; Masataka Matsumoto; Sumiya Ishigami; Takashi Aikou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Risk factors for intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a case-control study in China.

Authors:  Lian-Yuan Tao; Xiao-Dong He; Qiang Qu; Lei Cai; Wei Liu; Li Zhou; Shang-Ming Zhang
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.828

View more
  10 in total

1.  Prognostic value of multiple epithelial mesenchymal transition-associated proteins in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xiangguo Tian; Zhixin Cao; Qian Ding; Zhen Li; Chunqing Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Short interfering RNA directed against Slug blocks tumor growth, metastasis formation, and vascular leakage in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Xinsheng Wang; Kejun Zhang; Lijiang Sun; Jianqiang Liu; Haipin Lu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Slug inhibition upregulates radiation-induced PUMA activity leading to apoptosis in cholangiocarcinomas.

Authors:  Kejun Zhang; Bingyuan Zhang; Yun Lu; Chuandong Sun; Wei Zhao; Xuelong Jiao; Jilin Hu; Peng Mu; Hai Lu; Changyong Zhou
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Slug regulates proliferation and invasiveness of esophageal adenocarcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Kejun Zhang; Shaoyan Zhang; Xuelong Jiao; Haibo Wang; Dianliang Zhang; Zhaojian Niu; Yi Shen; Liang Lv; Yanbing Zhou
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  RNA interference targeting slug increases cholangiocarcinoma cell sensitivity to cisplatin via upregulating PUMA.

Authors:  Kejun Zhang; Dong Chen; Xingang Wang; Shaoyan Zhang; Jigang Wang; Yuan Gao; Bomin Yan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Blocking ERK1/2 signaling impairs TGF-β1 tumor promoting function but enhances its tumor suppressing role in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cells.

Authors:  Phaijit Sritananuwat; Natthaporn Sueangoen; Parichut Thummarati; Kittiya Islam; Tuangporn Suthiphongchai
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 5.722

7.  SRC-like adaptor protein negatively regulates Wnt signaling in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Xinxin He; Yangnian Wei; Ling Liu; Wen Wang; Nianfeng Li
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of epithelial mesenchymal transition-related protein expression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xing Yao; Xiang Wang; Zishu Wang; Licheng Dai; Guolei Zhang; Qiang Yan; Weimin Zhou
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  A prospective proteomic-based study for identifying potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yuan Shi; Xiaxing Deng; Qian Zhan; Baiyong Shen; Xiaolong Jin; Zhecheng Zhu; Hao Chen; Hongwei Li; Chenghong Peng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Prognostic significance of snail expression in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Dalu Kong; Jun Liang; Rong Li; Shihai Liu; Jigang Wang; Kejun Zhang; Dong Chen
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.590

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.