| Literature DB >> 23091390 |
Xing Yao1, Xiang Wang, Zishu Wang, Licheng Dai, Guolei Zhang, Qiang Yan, Weimin Zhou.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the patterns of expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related proteins in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The clinicopathological and prognostic value of these markers was also evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: epithelial-mesenchymal transition; expression; immunohistochemistry; intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; prognosis
Year: 2012 PMID: 23091390 PMCID: PMC3472698 DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S36213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Onco Targets Ther ISSN: 1178-6930 Impact factor: 4.147
Correlations between epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers and clinicopathological characteristics
| E-cadherin | Vimentin | N-cadherin | With two EMT markers | With three EMT markers | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| Absent (n = 42) | Present (n = 54) | Absent (n = 60) | Present (n = 36) | Absent (n = 41) | Present (n = 55) | Absent (n = 57) | Present (n = 39) | Absent (n = 69) | Present (n = 27) | ||||||
| Age (years) | |||||||||||||||
| <65 | 25 | 28 | 0.453 | 29 | 24 | 0.080 | 22 | 31 | 0.792 | 30 | 23 | 0.539 | 35 | 18 | 0.158 |
| ≥65 | 17 | 26 | 31 | 12 | 19 | 24 | 27 | 16 | 34 | 9 | |||||
| Gender | |||||||||||||||
| Female | 13 | 17 | 0.956 | 19 | 11 | 0.909 | 13 | 17 | 0.933 | 17 | 13 | 0.716 | 20 | 10 | 0.444 |
| Male | 29 | 37 | 41 | 25 | 28 | 38 | 40 | 26 | 49 | 17 | |||||
| Tumor size | |||||||||||||||
| <5 cm | 31 | 43 | 0.501 | 48 | 26 | 0.380 | 29 | 45 | 0.201 | 46 | 28 | 0.308 | 53 | 21 | 0.919 |
| ≥5 cm | 11 | 11 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 16 | 6 | |||||
| Lymph node metastasis | |||||||||||||||
| Negative | 20 | 42 | 0.002 | 46 | 16 | 0.001 | 28 | 34 | 0.512 | 43 | 19 | 0.007 | 50 | 12 | 0.010 |
| Positive | 22 | 12 | 14 | 20 | 13 | 21 | 14 | 20 | 19 | 15 | |||||
| Vascular invasion | |||||||||||||||
| Negative | 24 | 40 | 0.081 | 44 | 20 | 0.074 | 32 | 32 | 0.041 | 43 | 21 | 0.028 | 48 | 16 | 0.336 |
| Positive | 18 | 14 | 16 | 16 | 9 | 23 | 14 | 18 | 21 | 11 | |||||
| Neural invasion | |||||||||||||||
| Negative | 24 | 37 | 0.251 | 42 | 19 | 0.090 | 26 | 35 | 0.982 | 40 | 21 | 0.103 | 46 | 15 | 0.309 |
| Positive | 18 | 17 | 18 | 17 | 15 | 20 | 17 | 18 | 23 | 12 | |||||
| pTNM stage | |||||||||||||||
| I and II | 14 | 34 | 0.040 | 37 | 11 | 0.030 | 19 | 29 | 0.536 | 35 | 13 | 0.007 | 39 | 9 | 0.041 |
| III and IV | 28 | 20 | 23 | 25 | 22 | 26 | 22 | 26 | 30 | 18 | |||||
| Histology | |||||||||||||||
| Differentiated | 16 | 35 | 0.009 | 40 | 11 | 0.001 | 23 | 28 | 0.614 | 37 | 14 | 0.005 | 44 | 7 | 0.001 |
| Undifferentiated | 26 | 19 | 20 | 25 | 18 | 27 | 20 | 25 | 25 | 20 | |||||
Abbreviation: TNM, tumor-node-metastasis.
Figure 1Representative immunohistochemical images of three epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. (A) E-cadherin was strongly expressed in the plasma membrane of the tumor cells; (B) demonstration of loss of membranous E-cadherin in tumor cells; (C) negative N-cadherin expression with a positivity less than 10%; (D) demonstration of N-cadherin in the membrane and cytoplasm of tumor cells; (E) negative expression of vimentin in cancer cells while stromal cells were positively stained; and (F) acquired vimentin expression in cancer cells.
Figure 2Survival analysis of three epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers in univariate analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method determined by the log-rank test. E-cadherin loss (A) and upregulation of mesenchymal proteins vimentin (B) and N-cadherin (C) were found to be significantly associated with a poor outcome. There was also a trend toward coexistence of multiple epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers (D and E) associated with much more shorter overall survival.
Multivariate analysis of predictive factors for overall survival
| Variables | OS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| HR | 95% CI | ||
| LN metastasis | |||
| Positive versus negative | 2.416 | 1.166–5.003 | 0.018 |
| Vascular invasion | |||
| Positive versus negative | 1.222 | 0.703–2.124 | 0.478 |
| pTNM stage | |||
| I and II versus III and IV | 1.192 | 0.613–2.319 | 0.604 |
| Histology | |||
| Differentiated versus undifferentiated | 0.954 | 0.535–1.701 | 0.873 |
| E-cadherin | |||
| Present versus absent | 0.157 | 0.061–0.402 | 0.001 |
| Vimentin | |||
| Present versus absent | 0.678 | 0.304–1.515 | 0.344 |
| N-cadherin | |||
| Present versus absent | 1.320 | 0.732–2.379 | 0.356 |
Abbreviations: HR, hazards ratio; LN, lymph node; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; OS, overall survival; CI, confidence interval.