INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To reduce complications of transobturator tension-free vaginal tape, single-incision devices were introduced in the last years. We here report a comparison between the tension-free vaginal tape-obturator (TVT-O) and the TVT-Secur techniques in terms of efficacy and safety. METHODS:Eighty-four patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were scheduled to undergo TVT-O or TVT-Secur. Duration of the procedure, subjective estimate of blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative postvoidal residue (PVR), time to first voiding, and pain level were recorded. Urodynamic tests, PVR, Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF), King's Health Questionnaire, and a urinary diary were performed before and 12 months after procedure. RESULTS: No differences in terms of cure rate were observed between the two groups (81.6% vs. 83.8%). Complication rate in the TVT-Secur group was lower (8.1%) than in the TVT-O group (15.8%), but not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques seem to be effective and safe, with a low incidence of complications in both groups.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To reduce complications of transobturator tension-free vaginal tape, single-incision devices were introduced in the last years. We here report a comparison between the tension-free vaginal tape-obturator (TVT-O) and the TVT-Secur techniques in terms of efficacy and safety. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were scheduled to undergo TVT-O or TVT-Secur. Duration of the procedure, subjective estimate of blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative postvoidal residue (PVR), time to first voiding, and pain level were recorded. Urodynamic tests, PVR, Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF), King's Health Questionnaire, and a urinary diary were performed before and 12 months after procedure. RESULTS: No differences in terms of cure rate were observed between the two groups (81.6% vs. 83.8%). Complication rate in the TVT-Secur group was lower (8.1%) than in the TVT-O group (15.8%), but not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques seem to be effective and safe, with a low incidence of complications in both groups.
Authors: Jaromir Masata; Kamil Svabik; Karel Zvara; Petra Drahoradova; Rachid El Haddad; Petr Hubka; Alois Martan Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Lekha S Hota; Katherine Hanaway; Michele R Hacker; Anthony Disciullo; Eman Elkadry; Patricia Dramitinos; Alexander Shapiro; Tanaz Ferzandi; Peter L Rosenblatt Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2012 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: Annetta M Madsen; Sherif A El-Nashar; Joshua L Woelk; Christopher J Klingele; John B Gebhart; Emanuel C Trabuco Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Ana Maria H M Bianchi-Ferraro; Zsuzsanna I K Jarmy-Di Bella; Rodrigo de A Castro; Maria Augusta T Bortolini; Marair G F Sartori; Manoel J B C Girão Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2012-12-04 Impact factor: 2.894