| Literature DB >> 20502515 |
Elizabeth J Carlton1, Michelle Hsiang, Yi Zhang, Sarah Johnson, Alan Hubbard, Robert C Spear.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography allows for non-invasive examination of the liver and spleen and can further our understanding of schistosomiasis morbidity. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20502515 PMCID: PMC2872638 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000685
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Characteristics of the 578 participants in the ultrasound cohort in 2000.
| No. | (%) | |
| Sex | ||
| Female | 295 | (51) |
| Male | 279 | (49) |
| Age | ||
| <18 | 145 | (25) |
| 18–29 | 141 | (25) |
| 30–39 | 130 | (23) |
| 40–49 | 95 | (17) |
| 50+ | 63 | (11) |
| Occupation | ||
| Not farmer | 37 | (9) |
| Farmer | 392 | (91) |
| Education | ||
| Elementary school or less | 253 | (59) |
| Some middle school or higher | 175 | (41) |
Includes adults (>18 years) only.
The distribution of S. japonicum infection by age, sex, occupation, educational attainment, year and village.
| 2000 | 2002 | ||||||
| n | Infected (%) | n | Infected (%) | OR (95% CI) | |||
| Year | |||||||
| Year 2000 | 564 | 265 | (47) | 1.00 | |||
| Year 2002 | 504 | 161 | (32) | 0.53 (0.42–0.66) | |||
| Sex | |||||||
| Female | 288 | 147 | (51) | 260 | 78 | (30) | 1.00 |
| Male | 276 | 118 | (43) | 244 | 83 | (34) | 0.89 (0.69–1.16) |
| Age | |||||||
| <18 | 138 | 63 | (46) | 101 | 29 | (29) | 1.00 |
| 18–29 | 140 | 65 | (46) | 98 | 30 | (31) | 1.06 (0.72–1.56) |
| 30–39 | 129 | 70 | (54) | 150 | 59 | (39) | 1.33 (0.93–1.92) |
| 40–49 | 95 | 49 | (52) | 75 | 23 | (31) | 1.16 (0.78–1.73) |
| 50+ | 62 | 18 | (29) | 80 | 20 | (25) | 0.58 (0.36–0.95) |
| p-value, test for trend | 0.209 | ||||||
| Occupation | |||||||
| Not farmer | 37 | 13 | (35) | 35 | 9 | (26) | 1.00 |
| Farmer | 389 | 189 | (49) | 368 | 123 | (33) | 1.59 (0.84–3.01) |
| Education | |||||||
| Elementary school or less | 252 | 134 | (53) | 240 | 81 | (34) | 1.00 |
| Some middle school or higher | 173 | 68 | (39) | 162 | 51 | (31) | 0.70 (0.51–0.96) |
| Village | |||||||
| Xinming3 | 63 | 32 | (51) | 54 | 18 | (33) | 1.00 |
| Tuanjie2 | 58 | 6 | (10) | 56 | 8 | (14) | 0.19 (0.09–0.39) |
| Jiaojia4 | 59 | 13 | (22) | 54 | 7 | (13) | 0.29 (0.15–0.54) |
| Hexing1 | 61 | 19 | (31) | 59 | 8 | (14) | 0.39 (0.22–0.71) |
| Minhe1 | 67 | 29 | (43) | 55 | 23 | (42) | 0.99 (0.57–1.72) |
| Minhe3 | 61 | 35 | (57) | 56 | 20 | (36) | 1.18 (0.71–1.99) |
| Xinlong7 | 45 | 27 | (60) | 38 | 16 | (42) | 1.45 (0.80–2.62) |
| Jianxing6 | 60 | 41 | (68) | 48 | 21 | (44) | 1.81 (1.09–3.03) |
| Xinming7 | 45 | 31 | (69) | 42 | 19 | (45) | 1.82 (1.06–3.11) |
| Shian5 | 45 | 32 | (71) | 42 | 21 | (50) | 2.08 (1.14–3.81) |
Odds ratios account for multiple observations from the same individual using generalized estimating equations with exchangeable correlation and robust inference.
Test for trend was calculated by treating age categories as ordinal.
Analysis included adults (≥18 years) only.
Prevalence of abnormal liver and spleen measurements from 2000 to 2005.
| 2000 | 2002 | 2005 | ||||
| No. | (%) | No. | (%) | No. | (%) | |
| Parenchymal fibrosis | ||||||
| Grade 0 | 388 | (67) | 297 | (67) | 219 | (68) |
| Grade 1 | 83 | (14) | 50 | (11) | 35 | (11) |
| Grade 2 | 92 | (16) | 88 | (20) | 58 | (18) |
| Grade 3 | 15 | (3) | 9 | (2) | 9 | (3) |
| Periportal fibrosis | ||||||
| Grade 0 (av. diameter <3 mm) | 22 | (4) | 24 | (5) | 19 | (6) |
| Grade 1 (av. diameter 3 to 5 mm) | 535 | (93) | 401 | (90) | 299 | (93) |
| Grade 2 (av. diameter 5.1 to 7 mm) | 21 | (4) | 19 | (4) | 3 | (1) |
| Grade 3 (av. diameter >7 mm) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) |
| Left liver lobe | ||||||
| Normal | 389 | (84) | 373 | (85) | 250 | (79) |
| Enlarged | 73 | (16) | 67 | (15) | 67 | (21) |
| Right liver lobe | ||||||
| Normal | 351 | (76) | 402 | (91) | 277 | (87) |
| Enlarged | 111 | (24) | 38 | (9) | 40 | (13) |
| Portal vein | ||||||
| Normal | 417 | (90) | 383 | (87) | 274 | (86) |
| Dilated | 45 | (10) | 57 | (13) | 43 | (14) |
| Spleen (thickness) | ||||||
| Normal | 442 | (96) | 425 | (97) | 310 | (98) |
| Enlarged | 18 | (4) | 14 | (3) | 6 | (2) |
| Spleen vein | ||||||
| Normal | 549 | (95) | 406 | (92) | 313 | (98) |
| Dilated | 28 | (5) | 37 | (8) | 7 | (2) |
Enlargement of the left liver lobe, right liver lobe and spleen, and portal vein dilation were classified based on height-specific normal values [18].
The spleen vein was classified as dilated if the diameter exceeded 8 mm.
The relationship between ultrasound-detected abnormalities and age, sex and year.
| Parenchymal fibrosis | Periportal fibrosis | Left liver lobe enlargement | Right liver lobe enlargement | Portal vein dilation | Spleen enlargement | Spleen vein dilation | ||||||||
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||||||||
| Sex | ||||||||||||||
| Female | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||||
| Male | 1.18 | (0.85–1.64) | 4.35 | (2.05–9.23) | 0.41 | (0.28–0.60) | 1.88 | (1.29–2.73) | 1.28 | (0.87–1.89) | 0.89 | (0.43–1.83) | 1.22 | (0.74–2.01) |
| Age | ||||||||||||||
| <18 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||||
| 18–29 | 10.44 | (5.11–21.33) | 9.36 | (1.14–76.56) | 2.91 | (1.35–6.29) | 2.40 | (1.25–4.61) | 2.00 | (0.93–4.33) | 3.40 | (1.02–11.34) | 3.18 | (1.34–7.58) |
| 30–39 | 11.76 | (5.96–23.18) | 9.79 | (1.31–73.01) | 4.00 | (2.03–7.89) | 2.91 | (1.61–5.28) | 3.19 | (1.58–6.44) | 2.09 | (0.63–6.88) | 2.60 | (1.11–6.12) |
| 40–49 | 30.76 | (15.21–62.20) | 10.95 | (1.41–85.30) | 4.56 | (2.25–9.23) | 3.13 | (1.65–5.95) | 2.82 | (1.35–5.91) | 1.74 | (0.45–6.78) | 1.35 | (0.46–3.94) |
| 50+ | 35.89 | (17.45–73.80) | 8.47 | (1.07–67.07) | 6.21 | (3.05–12.63) | 3.26 | (1.66–6.41) | 3.98 | (1.97–8.06) | 1.82 | (0.47–6.98) | 2.32 | (0.93–5.79) |
| trend | <0.001 | 0.025 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.894 | 0.548 | |||||||
| Year | ||||||||||||||
| 2000 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||||
| 2002 | 0.82 | (0.68–0.98) | 1.07 | (0.59–1.96) | 0.86 | (0.62–1.19) | 0.26 | (0.18–0.37) | 1.28 | (0.87–1.88) | 0.79 | (0.42–1.49) | 1.79 | (1.09–2.93) |
| 2005 | 0.57 | (0.44–0.73) | 0.20 | (0.06–0.63) | 1.11 | (0.77–1.60) | 0.35 | (0.24–0.52) | 1.20 | (0.78–1.84) | 0.43 | (0.16–1.20) | 0.41 | (0.17–0.95) |
| trend | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.634 | <0.001 | 0.362 | 0.091 | 0.119 | |||||||
Periportal fibrosis was treated as a binary variable, comparing grade 2 to grades 0 and 1.
Enlargement of the left liver lobe, right liver lobe, spleen, and portal vein dilation were classified based on height-specific normal values.
There were no children (<18) with grade 3 parenchymal fibrosis, leading to a violation of the parallel regression assumption for ordinal logistic regression. For this analysis, grade 3 was grouped with grade 2 in order to avoid a model violation.
The test for trend was calculated by treating categories as ordinal.
Analysis adjusted for age and sex.
All odds ratios account for multiple observations from the same individual. Ordinal logistic regression with a sandwich type estimator was used for parenchymal fibrosis. Generalized estimating equations logistic regression with exchangeable correlation was used for all other measures.
The impact S. japonicum infection on ultrasound-detected liver abnormalities.
| Parenchymal fibrosis | Left liver lobe enlargement | Portal vein dilation | ||||||||||
| Adjusted | Unadjusted | Adjusted | Unadjusted | Adjusted | Unadjusted | |||||||
| OR | (95% CI) | OR | (95% CI) | OR | (95% CI) | OR | (95% CI) | OR | (95% CI) | OR | (95% CI) | |
| I. Current infection (n = 977) | ||||||||||||
| Uninfected | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| Infected | 1.40 | (1.03–1.90) | 1.21 | (0.91–1.61) | 1.05 | (0.73–1.51) | 1.00 | (0.72–1.40) | 0.86 | (0.55–1.35) | 0.80 | (0.51–1.25) |
| II. Current inf. intensity (n = 976) | ||||||||||||
| 0 EPG | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| 1–10 EPG | 1.50 | (0.99–2.27) | 1.36 | (0.91–2.05) | 1.04 | (0.55–1.97) | 1.02 | (0.55–1.91) | 1.10 | (0.56–2.15) | 1.05 | (0.54–2.04) |
| 11–50 EPG | 1.30 | (0.82–2.08) | 1.22 | (0.81–1.85) | 0.94 | (0.50–1.75) | 0.93 | (0.51–1.69) | 0.94 | (0.45–1.98) | 0.86 | (0.40–1.81) |
| >50 EPG | 2.10 | (1.33–3.32) | 1.46 | (0.95–2.25) | 1.71 | (0.94–3.12) | 1.47 | (0.84–2.55) | 0.82 | (0.35–1.93) | 0.66 | (0.28–1.57) |
| p-value, test for trend | 0.002 | 0.052 | 0.185 | 0.301 | 0.691 | 0.353 | ||||||
| III. Prior infection (n = 739) | ||||||||||||
| Uninfected | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| Infected | 1.84 | (1.30–2.60) | 1.48 | (1.06–2.05) | 1.45 | (0.97–2.17) | 1.18 | (0.81–1.72) | 1.09 | (0.71–1.68) | 1.00 | (0.65–1.52) |
| IV. Prior inf. intensity (n = 739) | ||||||||||||
| 0 EPG | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
| 1–10 EPG | 1.71 | (1.04–2.79) | 1.42 | (0.90–2.24) | 1.21 | (0.68–2.15) | 1.07 | (0.62–1.86) | 0.50 | (0.20–1.29) | 0.47 | (0.19–1.17) |
| 11–50 EPG | 2.07 | (1.21–3.57) | 1.79 | (1.08–2.97) | 1.39 | (0.79–2.42) | 1.17 | (0.67–2.04) | 1.37 | (0.71–2.66) | 1.25 | (0.66–2.38) |
| >50 EPG | 2.84 | (1.71–4.73) | 1.81 | (1.14–2.89) | 1.12 | (0.57–2.20) | 0.79 | (0.41–1.52) | 2.02 | (1.05–3.89) | 1.55 | (0.84–2.85) |
| p-value, test for trend | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.440 | 0.712 | 0.051 | 0.194 | ||||||
Adjusted models controlled for age, sex and year of ultrasound.
Current infection status and intensity was assessed at the time of an ultrasound examination.
The test for trend was calculated by treating infection intensity categories as ordinal.
Prior infection status and intensity was assessed two to three years before an ultrasound examination (in 2000 for the 2002 ultrasound examination, 2002 for the 2005 ultrasound examination).
All odds ratios account for multiple observations from the same individual. Ordinal logistic regression with a sandwich type estimator was used for parenchymal fibrosis. Generalized estimating equations logistic regression with exchangeable correlation was used for all other measures.
For each liver abnormality, four measures of infection are examined: current infection status, current infection intensity, prior infection status and prior infection intensity.
The reversal of ultrasound-detected liver and spleen abnormalities among individuals with abnormal measures in 2000.
| No. in 2000 | Reversed in 2002 | Reversed in 2005 | Never reversed | ||||
| No. | (%) | No. | (%) | No. | (%) | ||
| Parenchymal fibrosis (grade 2 or 3) | 71 | 11 | (15) | 17 | (24) | 51 | (72) |
| Periportal fibrosis (grade 2) | 17 | 14 | (82) | 16 | (94) | 0 | (0) |
| Left liver lobe enlarged | 58 | 35 | (60) | 35 | (60) | 13 | (22) |
| Right liver lobe enlarged | 85 | 65 | (76) | 63 | (74) | 10 | (12) |
| Portal vein dilated | 33 | 22 | (67) | 24 | (73) | 5 | (15) |
| Spleen enlarged | 16 | 13 | (81) | 16 | (100) | 0 | (0) |
| Spleen vein dilated | 16 | 12 | (75) | 15 | (94) | 0 | (0) |
Includes only individuals with complete follow-up data.
Regression to parenchymal fibrosis grade 0 or 1 was classified as reversal.