| Literature DB >> 36010252 |
Ian Kim B Tabios1,2,3, Marcello Otake Sato3, Ourlad Alzeus Gaddi Tantengco2, Raffy Jay C Fornillos1, Masashi Kirinoki3, Megumi Sato4, Raniv D Rojo2, Ian Kendrich C Fontanilla1, Yuichi Chigusa5, Paul Mark B Medina6, Mihoko Kikuchi7, Lydia R Leonardo1,8,9,10.
Abstract
Host-derived microRNAs (miRNAs) play important regulatory roles in schistosomiasis-induced hepatic fibrosis. This study analyzed selected serum miRNAs among Filipino schistosomiasis japonica patients with ultrasound (US)-detectable hepatic fibrosis. A prospective cohort study design with convenience sampling was employed from 2017 to 2019. The study sites were eight endemic barangays in Leyte, Philippines. Eligible chronic schistosomiasis patients with varying severities of hepatic fibrosis were enrolled in the cohort and serially examined at 6, 12, and 24 months from baseline. Baseline serum miR-146a-5p, let-7a-5p, miR-150-5p, miR-122-5p, miR-93-5p, and miR200b-3p were measured using RT-qPCR. A total of 136 chronic schistosomiasis patients were included in this prospective cohort study. Approximately, 42.6% had no fibrosis, 22.8% had mild fibrosis, and 34.6% had severe fibrosis at baseline The serum levels of the antifibrotic miR-146a (p < 0.0001), miR-150 (p = 0.0058), and let-7a (p < 0.0001) were significantly lower in patients with hepatic fibrosis while the profibrotic miR-93 (p = 0.0024) was elevated. miR-146a-5p (AUC = 0.90, 95% CI [0.84, 0.96], p < 0.0001) has the most promising potential to differentiate patients with (n = 78) versus without (n = 58) hepatic fibrosis. The baseline level of serum miR-146-5p was significantly different in patients with progressive fibrosis (n = 17) compared to those who never developed fibrosis (n = 30, p < 0.01) or those who had fibrosis reversal (n = 20, p < 0.01) after 24 months. These findings demonstrate the potential utility of serum miRNAs, particularly of miR-146a, as a supplementary tool for assessing hepatic fibrosis in chronic schistosomiasis japonica patients.Entities:
Keywords: Schistosoma japonica; biomarker; miRNA; prognosis; schistosome
Year: 2022 PMID: 36010252 PMCID: PMC9406767 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12081902
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4418
Figure 1Participant recruitment and follow-up flow diagram.
Baseline characteristics of the 136 patients enrolled in the prospective study.
| Parameters | Schistosomiasis Patients 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type 0 | Types 1–2 | Type 3 | ||
| Female | 19 | 10 | 20 | 0.51 a, NS |
| Male | 39 | 21 | 27 | |
| Age, mean ± SD (year) | 36.9 ± 6.9 | 36.7 ± 5.6 | 37.8 ± 6.4 | 0.68 b, NS |
| BMI ± SD (kg/m2) | 28.7 ± 6.2 | 29.9 ± 5.9 | 26.1 ± 9.6 | 0.06 b, NS |
| WBC, mean ± SD | 8.7 ± 4.3 | 7.5 ± 3.7 | 9.7 ± 4.1 | 0.06 b, NS |
| Hgb, mean ± SD | 151.0 ± 32.3 | 149.3 ± 19.7 | 143.9 ± 21.1 | 0.32 b, NS |
| PLT, mean ± SD | 327.3 ± 137.9 | 361.3 ± 157.2 | 384.8 ± 166.6 | 0.17 b, NS |
| ALT, mean ± SD | 35 ± 17.2 | 29 ± 11.2 | 32 ± 8.7 | 0.10 a, NS |
| ALT abnormality | 6 (10.3) | 4 (12.9) | 6 (12.8) | 0.9 a, NS |
| AST, mean ± SD | 31 ± 10.7 | 27 ± 6.3 | 29 ± 8.9 | 0.17 b, NS |
| AST abnormality | 4 (6.9) | 2 (6.5) | 3 (6.5) | 0.99 a, NS |
| EPG, mean ± SD | 89.2 ± 65.1 | 99.1 ± 52.3 | 157 ± 101.2 | <0.01 b, c, S |
| Infection Intensity 2 | ||||
| Low | 41 | 24 | 33 | 0.53 d, NS |
| Moderate | 16 | 5 | 10 | |
| High | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
Note: 1 Classification of hepatic fibrosis based on Ohmae et al. (1992), 2 infection intensity based on WHO, a Chi-square test, b Brown–Forsythe ANOVA test, c Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons test showed that EPG in Type 3 was significantly different to Type 0 (p-value < 0.0001) and Types 1–2 (p-value < 0.0001),d Friedman test one-way ANOVA, S statistically significant at p < 0.05, NS not statistically significant. Abbreviations: Body mass index (BMI), white blood cell (WBC), hemoglobin (Hgb), platelet (PLT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), egg per gram (EPG), Standard Deviation (SD).
Descriptive characteristics of the 136 patients enrolled in the prospective study at baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months after PZQ treatment.
| Parameters | Baseline | Follow-Up | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 Months | 12 Months | 24 Months | |||||
|
| |||||||
| 3 stool K-K | 136 (100) | 0 (0.0) | - | 0 (0) | - | 34 (25.0) | - |
| EPG, mean ± SD | 106 ± 45 | - | - | - | - | 46 ± 16 | - |
| SEA ELISA | 136 (100) | 136 (100) | - | 101 (74.3) | - | 89 (65.4) | - |
|
| |||||||
| Low | 98 (72.1) | 0 (0) | - | 0 (0) | - | 32 (0) | - |
| Moderate | 31 (22.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (0) | |||
| High | 7 (5.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |||
|
| |||||||
| Type 0 | 58 (42.6) | 59 (43.4) | - | 63 (46.3) | - | 66 (48.5) | - |
| Types 1 and 2 | 31 (22.8) | 30 (22.1) | 24 (17.6) | 18 (13.2) | |||
| Type 3 | 47 (34.6) | 47 (34.6) | 49 (36.0) | 52 (38.2) | |||
|
| |||||||
| normal | 118 (86.8) | 117 (86.0) | 0.99 NS | 121 (89.0) | 0.71 NS | 128 (94.1) | 0.06 NS |
| thickened | 18 (13.2) | 19 (14.0) | 15 (11.0) | 8 (5.9) | |||
|
| |||||||
| normal | 122 (89.7) | 127 (93.4) | 0.38 NS | 132 (97.1) | 0.03 S | 133 (97.8) | 0.01 S |
| enlarged | 14 (10.3) | 9 (6.6) | 4 (2.9) | 3 (2.2) | |||
|
| |||||||
| normal | 116 (85.3) | 130 (95.6) | <0.01 S | 133 (97.8) | <0.01 S | 133 (97.8) | <0.01 S |
| enlarged | 20 (14.7) | 6 (4.4) | 3 (2.2) | 3 (2.2) | |||
Note:1 Infection intensity classification based on WHO criteria, 2 classification of hepatic fibrosis based on Ohmae et al. (1992), 3 measurements based on Chinese population normal values, a pairwise comparison between baseline and follow-up using Fisher’s exact test at cut-off p-value of < 0.05. S statistically significant at p-value < 0.05. NS not statistically significant; Abbreviations: Kato–Katz (K-K), Soluble Egg Antigen ELISA (SEA ELISA), egg per gram (EPG), Standard Deviation (SD).
Figure 2Dynamics of US-detectable hepatic fibrosis severity at different timepoints after PZQ treatment among the 136 patients enrolled in the prospective study. (A) Patients with no hepatic fibrosis at baseline (T0, n = 58). (B) Patients with mild hepatic fibrosis at baseline (T1/2, n = 31). (C) Patients with severe or typical network hepatic fibrosis at baseline (T3, n = 47). Note: Values presented are the absolute count of patients in each classification. Abbreviation: Praziquantel (PZQ).
Figure 3Differentiation of schistosomiasis-infected patients without ultrasonographic evidence of hepatic fibrosis (type 0) from those with hepatic fibrosis (types 1–3) by expression levels of circulating serum (A) miR-93-50, (B) miR-150-5p, (C) miR-146a-5-, and (D) let-7a-5p at baseline using the ROC curve analysis. Note: p-values were computed using Wilson/Brown test.
Diagnostic performance in differentiating chronic schistosomiasis patients with and without hepatic fibrosis of the designated expression cut-off value at baseline for each circulating serum miRNA based on ROC analysis.
| Target | AUC | Expression | Sensitivity % | Specificity % | LR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| miR-146a-5p | 0.90 | <−8.16 | 60.34 | 98.72 | 47.07 |
| let-7a-5p | 0.73 | <−8.75 | 5.172 | 98.72 | 4.03 |
| miR-150-5p | 0.64 | <−7.67 | 12.07 | 96.15 | 3.14 |
| miR-93-5p | 0.67 | >−3.42 | 13.79 | 98.72 | 10.76 |
Abbreviations: Area under the curve (AUC), likelihood ratio (LR), confidence interval (CI).
Figure 4Differentiation of patients with progressive fibrosis (PF, n = 17) from those with (A) stable US findings (SF, n = 30) and (B) reversal of fibrosis (RF, n = 20) by baseline serum levels of the 6 target miRNAs. Note: p-values were computed using Wilson/Brown test.