| Literature DB >> 35774791 |
Ian Kim B Tabios1,2,3, Marcello Otake Sato3, Ourlad Alzeus G Tantengco2, Raffy Jay C Fornillos1, Masashi Kirinoki3, Megumi Sato4, Raniv D Rojo2, Ian Kendrich C Fontanilla1, Yuichi Chigusa5, Paul Mark B Medina6, Mihoko Kikuchi7, Lydia R Leonardo1,8,9,10.
Abstract
Schistosomiasis remains to ha/ve a significant public health impact in the Philippines. The Kato-Katz (K-K) technique is the reference standard and most used technique for definitive diagnosis of intestinal schistosomiasis for control programs in endemic regions. However, this has a very low sensitivity when applied in areas of low endemicity and patients with light infection. Hence, this study determined the diagnostic performance of immunological, molecular, parasitological, and ultrasonographic tests in diagnosing intestinal schistosomiasis in endemic municipalities in the Philippines. We performed a community-based cross-sectional study to determine the positivity of schistosomiasis in Leyte, Philippines. The diagnostic performance of five different detection techniques: (1) three stool K-K with duplicate smears; (2) soluble egg antigen IgG ELISA; (3) urine point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (POC-CCA) test; (4) detection of Schistosoma japonicum circulating DNA (SjcDNA) in serum and urine samples; (5) focused abdominal ultrasound (US), were also obtained in this study. Multiple stool examinations enhanced the sensitivity of K-K from 26.2% (95% CI [16.4, 38.8]) with single stool to 53.8% (95% CI [41.1, 66.1]) and 69.2% (95% CI [56.4, 80.0]) with two and three stools from consecutive days, respectively. Among the SjcDNA nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT)-based detection assays, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) PCR using sera had the highest sensitivity at 92.3% (95% CI [82.2, 97.1]) with LAMP consistently identifying more positive cases in both serum and urine samples. This study showed that single stool K-K, which remains the only diagnostic test available in most endemic areas in the Philippines, had low sensitivity and failed to identify most patients with light infection. SjcDNA detection assay and POC-CCA urine test were more sensitive than stool microscopy in detecting schistosomiasis. On the other hand, US was less sensitive than the widely utilized K-K technique in diagnosing schistosomiasis. This study emphasizes the need to revisit the use of single stool K-K in the surveillance and case detection of schistosomiasis in endemic areas of the Philippines. The availability of advanced and more sensitive diagnostic tests will help better control, prevent, and eliminate schistosomiasis in the country.Entities:
Keywords: LAMP; PCR; Schistosoma japonicum; immunodiagnosis; positivity; ultrasound
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35774791 PMCID: PMC9237846 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.899311
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Figure 1Map showing the study sites in the schistosomiasis endemic island of Leyte, Philippines.
Figure 2Recruitment of participants for the diagnostic performance (n = 230) and post-treatment studies (n = 25).
Positivity of schistosomiasis at baseline based on conventional diagnostic tests.
| Study Sites | Schistosomiasis Positivity (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Municipality | Barangay | 3 K-K | SEA ELISA | US | |||
| N | %(95% CI) | N | %(95% CI) | N | %(95% CI) | ||
| Alangalang | Bugho n = 159 | 45 | 28.3 (22.0-36.2) | 85 | 53.5 (46.2 – 61.8) | 46 | 28.9 (22.7 – 36.9) |
| SAF n = 139 | 37 | 26.6 (20.2-35.1) | 69 | 49.6 (42.0 – 58.7) | 23 | 16.5 (11.4 – 24.0) | |
| Palo | Cangumbang n = 138 | 28 | 20.3 (14.6-28.2) | 42 | 30.4 (23.6 – 39.2) | 38 | 27.5 (21.0 – 36.1) |
| Tacurangan n = 73 | 24 | 32.9 (23.7-45.6) | 42 | 57.5 (47.2 – 70.1) | 9 | 12.3 (6.7 – 22.7) | |
| Julita | Dita n = 189 | 67 | 35.5 (29.2-43.0) | 79 | 41.8 (35.3 – 49.5) | 52 | 27.5 (21.8 – 34.7) |
| Calbasag n = 114 | 29 | 25.4 (18.6-34.8) | 31 | 27.2 (20.1 – 36.7) | 31 | 27.2 (20.1 – 36.7) | |
| Sta Fe | San Juan n = 87 | 24 | 27.6 (19.6-38.8) | 37 | 42.5 (33.3 – 54.3) | 23 | 26.4 (18.6 – 37.5) |
| San Roque n = 81 | 15 | 18.5 (11.7-29.2) | 23 | 28.4 (20.0 – 40.1) | 10 | 12.3 (6.9 – 22.1) | |
| TOTAL (n = 980) | 269 | 27.4 (24.8-30.4) | 408 | 41.6 (38.7 – 44.8) | 232 | 23.7 (21.2 – 26.5) | |
3 K-K, Three stool Kato-Katz; (SEA) ELISA, Soluble Egg Antigen; US, Ultrasound.
Diagnostic performances of the different schistosomiasis examinations of samples collected from 230 participants using a composite reference standard (CRS).
| Examination | Diagnostic Performance | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | PPV (95% CI) | NPV (95% CI) | K | |
| sLAMP | 92.3 (82.2-97.1) | 100.0 (97.2-100.0) | 100.0 (92.5-100.0) | 97.1 (92.9-98.9) | 0.95 |
| uLAMP | 83.1 (71.3-90.9) | 100.0 (97.2-100.0) | 100.0 (91.7-100.0) | 93.8 (88.8-96.7) | 0.88 |
| POC-CCA | 69.2 (56.4-79.8) | 69.7 (62.0-76.5) | 47.4 (37.1-57.8) | 85.2 (77.8-90.5) | 0.34 |
| sPCR | 87.7 (76.6-94.2) | 100.0 (97.2-100.0) | 100.0 (92.1-100.0) | 95.4 (90.8-97.8) | 0.91 |
| uPCR | 80.0 (67.9-88.5) | 100.0 (97.2-100.0) | 100.0 (91.4-100.0) | 92.7 (87.6-95.9) | 0.85 |
| 3 K-K | 69.2 (56.4-80.0) | 100.0 (97.2-100.0) | 100.0 (90.2-100.0) | 89.2 (83.6-93.1) | 0.76 |
| 2 K-K | 53.8 (41.1-66.1) | 100.0 (97.2-100.0) | 100.0 (87.7-100.0) | 84.6 (78.6-89.2) | 0.63 |
| 1 K-K | 26.2 (16.4-38.8) | 100.0 (97.2-100.0) | 100.0 (77.1-100.0) | 77.5 (71.1-82.8) | 0.34 |
| SEA ELISA | 84.6 (73.1-92.0) | 81.8 (74.9-87.2) | 64.7 (53.5-74.6) | 93.1 (87.3-96.5) | 0.61 |
| US | 30.8 (20.2-43.6) | 83.6 (76.9-88.8) | 42.6 (28.6-57.7) | 75.4 (68.4-81.3) | 0.16 |
Sn, Sensitivity; Sp, Specificity; PPV, Positive Predictive Value; NPV, Negative Predictive Value; K, Kappa Coefficient; sLAMP, Serum LAMP; uLAMP, Urine LAMP; POC-CCA, Point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen urine test; sPCR, Serum PCR; uPCR, Urine PCR; 3 K-K, Three stool Kato-Katz; 2 K-K, Two stool Kato-Katz; 1 K-K, Single stool Kato-Katz; (SEA) ELISA, Soluble Egg Antigen; US, Ultrasound.
Figure 3Correlations of egg per gram (EPG) determined by three stool Kato-Katz with results of single stool Kato-Katz, point of care circulating cathodic antigen (POC-CCA) urine test, and serum PCR (n = 45).
Negative conversion of the different diagnostic examinations in 25 patients 5 and 7 months after completion of praziquantel treatment.
| Periods after treatment | N of examined cases | Negative conversion, N (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 K-K | sLAMP | uLAMP | POC-CCA | SEA ELISA | ||
| 5 months | 25 | 25 (100) | 14 (56.0) | 10 (40.0) | 15 (60.0) | 3 (9.7) |
| 7 months | 25 | 25 (100) | 17 (68.0) | 19 (76.0) | 21 (84.0) | 5 (16.1) |
3 K-K, Three stool Kato-Katz; sLAMP, Serum LAMP; uLAMP, Urine LAMP; POC-CCA, Point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen urine test; (SEA) ELISA, Soluble Egg Antigen.
Figure 4Number of positive patients at 5 months and 7 months post-PZQ treatment based on different diagnostic tests (n = 25). PZQ, Praziquantel; SEA IgG ELISA, Soluble Egg Antigen; uLAMP, Urine LAMP; sLAMP, Serum LAMP; POC-CCA, Point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen urine test; 3 K-K, Three consecutive days stool Kato-Katz.