Mi-Sun Lee1, Li Su, David C Christiani. 1. Environmental and Occupational Medicine and Epidemiology Program, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Polymorphisms in carcinogen detoxification enzymes, NAT2 and GSTM1, have been suggested as susceptibility factors for DNA damage and lung cancer. However, little information is available on DNA adduct burden in the lung tissue and polymorphisms in NAT2 and GST genes. We investigated the independent and combined effects of the metabolic gene polymorphisms of NAT2 and GSTs on DNA adduct formation in different tissues (lung and blood) in lung cancer patients. METHODS: DNA adducts were measured in lung and blood by the (32)P-postlabeling assay. Multiple regression models were used to assess adjusted percent change in DNA adduct levels associated with GST and NAT2 genotypes. RESULTS: After adjusting for potential confounders, as well as for other GST gene variants, lung adduct levels significantly increased by 150.3% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 35.4-362.6%] for the GSTM1 null and by 73.9% (95% CI, -3.2% to 212.4%) for the NAT2 slow acetylator genotype, respectively. No association was seen with polymorphisms of other GST genes such as GSTT1 and GSTP1. The high-risk group, the combined GSTM1 null plus NAT2 slow, had significantly enhanced levels of lung adducts by 295% (95% CI, 72.7-803.5%) over those associated with single genes, suggesting a synergistic effect on DNA damage in the target lung tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in DNA adduct levels in lung is associated with the GSTM1 null and NAT2 slow genotypes alone or in combination. IMPACT: These results suggest that GSTM1 and NAT2 genotypes play an independent and interactive role in the formation of carcinogen DNA adduct in the lung. Copyright 2010 AACR.
BACKGROUND: Polymorphisms in carcinogen detoxification enzymes, NAT2 and GSTM1, have been suggested as susceptibility factors for DNA damage and lung cancer. However, little information is available on DNA adduct burden in the lung tissue and polymorphisms in NAT2 and GST genes. We investigated the independent and combined effects of the metabolic gene polymorphisms of NAT2 and GSTs on DNA adduct formation in different tissues (lung and blood) in lung cancerpatients. METHODS: DNA adducts were measured in lung and blood by the (32)P-postlabeling assay. Multiple regression models were used to assess adjusted percent change in DNA adduct levels associated with GST and NAT2 genotypes. RESULTS: After adjusting for potential confounders, as well as for other GST gene variants, lung adduct levels significantly increased by 150.3% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 35.4-362.6%] for the GSTM1 null and by 73.9% (95% CI, -3.2% to 212.4%) for the NAT2 slow acetylator genotype, respectively. No association was seen with polymorphisms of other GST genes such as GSTT1 and GSTP1. The high-risk group, the combined GSTM1 null plus NAT2 slow, had significantly enhanced levels of lung adducts by 295% (95% CI, 72.7-803.5%) over those associated with single genes, suggesting a synergistic effect on DNA damage in the target lung tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in DNA adduct levels in lung is associated with the GSTM1 null and NAT2 slow genotypes alone or in combination. IMPACT: These results suggest that GSTM1 and NAT2 genotypes play an independent and interactive role in the formation of carcinogen DNA adduct in the lung. Copyright 2010 AACR.
Authors: S M Hou; S Fält; K Yang; F Nyberg; G Pershagen; K Hemminki; B Lambert Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: G Liu; D P Miller; W Zhou; S W Thurston; R Fan; L L Xu; T J Lynch; J C Wain; L Su; D C Christiani Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-12-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: P Vineis; H Bartsch; N Caporaso; A M Harrington; F F Kadlubar; M T Landi; C Malaveille; P G Shields; P Skipper; G Talaska Journal: Nature Date: 1994-05-12 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Wei Zhou; Geoffrey Liu; Sally W Thurston; Li Lian Xu; David P Miller; John C Wain; Thomas J Lynch; Li Su; David C Christiani Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: W A García-Suástegui; A Huerta-Chagoya; K L Carrasco-Colín; M M Pratt; K John; P Petrosyan; J Rubio; M C Poirier; M E Gonsebatt Journal: Mutagenesis Date: 2010-12-30 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: Arash Etemadi; Farhad Islami; David H Phillips; Roger Godschalk; Asieh Golozar; Farin Kamangar; Akbar Fazel-Tabar Malekshah; Akram Pourshams; Seerat Elahi; Farhad Ghojaghi; Paul T Strickland; Philip R Taylor; Paolo Boffetta; Christian C Abnet; Sanford M Dawsey; Reza Malekzadeh; Frederik J van Schooten Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2012-12-17 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Waleed M Al-Shaqha; Khalid M Alkharfy; Nasser M Al-Daghri; Abdul Khader Mohammed Journal: Ann Saudi Med Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.526