Literature DB >> 11859435

The effect of relevant genotypes on PAH exposure-related biomarkers.

Terhi Kuljukka-Rabb1, Lars Nylund, Raija Vaaranrinta, Kirsti Savela, Pertti Mutanen, Toomas Veidebaum, Marja Sorsa, Agneta Rannug, Kimmo Peltonen.   

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in coke oven emissions cause a cancer risk to humans. In a comprehensive biomonitoring study among Estonian coke oven workers, we looked at the effect of genetic polymorphisms in metabolic enzymes on urinary mutagenicity, 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OHP) concentration in urine, and aromatic DNA adducts in white blood cells (WBCs). Coke oven workers were sampled twice (samplings I and II), and controls only once at the time of sampling I. Urinary mutagenicity was measured using the Ames test. CYP1A1, microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH), and glutathione S-transferase (GST) genotypes were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Urinary mutagenicity did not differ between exposed and controls, but those coke oven workers who were smokers had significantly higher (P=0.0002) mutagenic activity in urine than nonsmokers. Urinary mutagenicity was moderately correlated to levels of 1-OHP and aromatic DNA adducts, the P values ranging from 0.0005 to 0.002. Carriers of a variant allele in exon 4 of mEH (Arg139) had elevated urinary mutagenicity (sampling I). In addition, urine mutagenicity of persons with predicted high mEH activity was significantly higher. Smoking habit did not explain the differences observed in urinary mutagenicity between mEH phenotype or genotype subgroups. Variation in exon 3 of mEH (His113) was related to a significantly (P=0.01) higher 1-OHP concentration in exposed workers (sampling II). Workers from sampling I who had an Arg139 variation in mEH had lower levels of adducts in lymphocytes (P=0.01) than others, while airborne benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) and His113 variation affected interactively on adduct levels. Our study shows that a comprehensive assessment of exposure is essential for elucidation of PAH exposure at a workplace. Even at high exposures metabolic polymorphisms seem to have some effect on biomarker levels, and should be assessed in biomonitoring studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11859435     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1053-4245


  8 in total

1.  Synergistic effects of NAT2 slow and GSTM1 null genotypes on carcinogen DNA damage in the lung.

Authors:  Mi-Sun Lee; Li Su; David C Christiani
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  Environmental factors in causing human cancers: emphasis on tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Umesh T Sankpal; Hima Pius; Moeez Khan; Mohammed I Shukoor; Pius Maliakal; Chris M Lee; Maen Abdelrahim; Sarah F Connelly; Riyaz Basha
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-05-22

3.  Association between urinary 1-hydroxypyrene and genotoxic effects in coke oven workers.

Authors:  E Siwińska; D Mielzyńska; L Kapka
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Human Biomonitoring in the Oil Shale Industry Area in Estonia-Overview of Earlier Programmes and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Hans Orru; Anu Viitak; Koit Herodes; Triin Veber; Märten Lukk
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-11-12

Review 5.  Synthetically important ring opening reactions by alkoxybenzenes and alkoxynaphthalenes.

Authors:  Ranadeep Talukdar
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  PAH-DNA adducts, cigarette smoking, GST polymorphisms, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Kathleen M McCarty; Regina M Santella; Susan E Steck; Rebecca J Cleveland; Jiyoung Ahn; Christine B Ambrosone; Kari North; Sharon K Sagiv; Sybil M Eng; Susan L Teitelbaum; Alfred I Neugut; Marilie D Gammon
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Primary DNA damage and genetic polymorphisms for CYP1A1, EPHX and GSTM1 in workers at a graphite electrode manufacturing plant.

Authors:  Massimo Moretti; Marco Dell'Omo; Milena Villarini; Roberta Pastorelli; Giacomo Muzi; Luisa Airoldi; Rossana Pasquini
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Residents' Self-Reported Health Effects and Annoyance in Relation to Air Pollution Exposure in an Industrial Area in Eastern-Estonia.

Authors:  Hans Orru; Jane Idavain; Mihkel Pindus; Kati Orru; Kaisa Kesanurm; Aavo Lang; Jelena Tomasova
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.