Literature DB >> 20499119

Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins.

Margareta Rinastiti1, Mutlu Özcan, Widowati Siswomihardjo, Henk J Busscher.   

Abstract

This study evaluates effects of aging on repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins and characterizes the interacting surfaces after aging. Disk-shaped composite specimens were assigned to one of three aging conditions: (1) thermocycling (5,000 ×, 5-55 °C), (2) storage in water at 37 °C for 6 months, or (3) immersion in citric acid at 37 °C, pH 3 for 1 week; a non-aged group acted as the control. Two surface conditionings were selected: intermediate adhesive resin application (IAR-application) and chairside silica coating followed by silanization and its specific IAR-application (SC-application). Composite resins, of the same kind as their substrate, were adhered onto the substrates, and repair shear bond strengths were determined, followed by failure type evaluation. Filler particle exposure was determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and surface roughness analyzed using scanning electron and atomic force microscopy. Surface roughness increased in all composite resins after aging, but filler particle exposure at the surface only increased after thermocycling and citric acid immersion. Composite resin type, surface conditioning, and aging method significantly influenced the repair bond strengths (p < 0.05, three-way analysis of variance) with the least severe effects of water storage. Repair bond strengths in aged composite resins after IAR-application were always lower in non-aged ones, while SC-application led to higher bond strengths than IAR-application after thermocycling and water storage. In addition, SC-application led to more cohesive failures than after IAR-application, regardless the aging method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20499119      PMCID: PMC3172408          DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0426-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  34 in total

1.  Comparative study of the physical properties of a polyacid-modified composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.

Authors:  M A Cattani-Lorente; V Dupuis; F Moya; J Payan; J M Meyer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Bonding of composite to water aged composite with surface treatments.

Authors:  Pavinee Padipatvuthikul; Lawrence H Mair
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to feldpathic ceramic after different etching and silanization regimens in dry and aged conditions.

Authors:  Aline Scalone Brentel; Mutlu Ozcan; Luiz Felipe Valandro; Lilian Guimarães Alarça; Regina Amaral; Marco Antonio Bottino
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition.

Authors:  Federica Papacchini; Susanna Dall'Oca; Nicoletta Chieffi; Cecilia Goracci; Fernanda Tranchesi Sadek; Byoung I Suh; Franklin R Tay; Marco Ferrari
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength.

Authors:  Andreas Rathke; Yana Tymina; Bernd Haller
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Shear bond strength of immediately repaired light-cured composite resin restorations.

Authors:  G Lewis; W Johnson; W Martin; A Canerdy; C Claburn; M Collier
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.440

7.  Surface treatment techniques for resin composite repair.

Authors:  M R Bouschlicher; J W Reinhardt; M A Vargas
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.522

8.  Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions.

Authors:  Mutlu Ozcan; Silvia Helena Barbosa; Renata Marques Melo; Graziela Avila Prado Galhano; Marco Antonio Bottino
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Effect of food-simulating liquids on the mechanical properties of provisional restorative materials.

Authors:  Tolga Akova; Ahmet Ozkomur; Hakan Uysal
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments.

Authors:  Margareta Rinastiti; Mutlu Ozcan; Widowati Siswomihardjo; Henk J Busscher
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  30 in total

1.  Effect of sonic-activated resin composites on the repair of aged substrates: an in vitro investigation.

Authors:  Nicoleta Ilie; Marie-Thérèse Oberthür
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Repairability of CAD/CAM high-density PMMA- and composite-based polymers.

Authors:  Annette Wiegand; Lukas Stucki; Robin Hoffmann; Thomas Attin; Bogna Stawarczyk
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength of composite resin to bur and laser treated composite resin.

Authors:  Özden Özel Bektas; Digdem Eren; Seyda Herguner Siso; Gulsah E Akin
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Evaluation of Composite Surface Irradiated by Different Powers of Er:YAG Laser.

Authors:  Ardavan Etemadi; Sima Shahabi; Nasim Chiniforush; Edris Pordel; Zahra Azarbayejani; Soolmaz Heidari
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015

5.  Bonding performance of self-adhesive flowable composites to enamel, dentin and a nano-hybrid composite.

Authors:  Jana Peterson; Marta Rizk; Monika Hoch; Annette Wiegand
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.634

6.  Repair of dental resin-based composites.

Authors:  Veronika Baur; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  How to repair fillings made by silorane-based composites.

Authors:  Sarah Ivanovas; Reinhard Hickel; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Repair bond strength of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites: effect of substrate resin type, surface conditioning and ageing.

Authors:  Mutlu Özcan; Pedro Henrique Corazza; Susana Maria Salazar Marocho; Silvia Helena Barbosa; Marco Antonio Bottino
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Minimal intervention in dentistry: which is the best approach for silorane composite restoration repairs?

Authors:  Rayssa-Ferreira Zanatta; Carlos-Rocha-Gomes Torres; Juliana-Boa-Sorte de Oliveira; Karen-Cristina-Kazue Yui; Amanda-Guedes-Nogueira Matuda; Stephanie-Ribeiro Lopes; Ana-Paula-Valente-Pinho Mafetano; Raquel-Pinto Campos; Alessandra-Bühler Borges; Cesar-Rogério Pucci
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-04-01

10.  The effect of surface treatments and bonding regimens on microtensile bond strengths of repaired composite: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Gouri Smita Acharya; Mk Manjunath
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2012-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.