PURPOSE: To compare bond strengths of fresh resin composites to previously polymerized ("aged") composites following various surface treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty Pertac Hybrid (PH) and an equal number of Silux Plux (SLX) specimens were fabricated and stored for 1 week prior to surface treatment. The specimens were then polished and stored for an additional 24 hours prior to final surface treatment. The surface treatments included use of one of the following: (1) diamond bur (DB), (2) microetcher with 50 microns Al2O3@80 psi pressure (ME), (3) high-pressure air abrasion with 27 microns Al2O3@psi, (KCP), or (4) low-pressure silicate ceramic deposition using 30 microns particles@34 psi (CJ-S) with a microetcher. Half of the samples were treated with a silanating agent. Fresh resin composite (same type as used for the aged specimen) was bonded to the treated surfaces, and specimens were then stored 24 h and thermocycled 300 x at 5 degrees and 55 degrees C prior to testing for shear bond strength. Two-way ANOVA was used to determine significant differences between mean shear bond strengths for both composite materials. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the groups for both surface treatment and silane use (P < 0.05). The interaction between the two main effects was also significant (P < 0.05). Overall, the highest bond strengths were found when the low-pressure silicate ceramic deposition system (CJ-S) was used, with or without silane.
PURPOSE: To compare bond strengths of fresh resin composites to previously polymerized ("aged") composites following various surface treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty Pertac Hybrid (PH) and an equal number of Silux Plux (SLX) specimens were fabricated and stored for 1 week prior to surface treatment. The specimens were then polished and stored for an additional 24 hours prior to final surface treatment. The surface treatments included use of one of the following: (1) diamond bur (DB), (2) microetcher with 50 microns Al2O3@80 psi pressure (ME), (3) high-pressure air abrasion with 27 microns Al2O3@psi, (KCP), or (4) low-pressure silicate ceramic deposition using 30 microns particles@34 psi (CJ-S) with a microetcher. Half of the samples were treated with a silanating agent. Fresh resin composite (same type as used for the aged specimen) was bonded to the treated surfaces, and specimens were then stored 24 h and thermocycled 300 x at 5 degrees and 55 degrees C prior to testing for shear bond strength. Two-way ANOVA was used to determine significant differences between mean shear bond strengths for both composite materials. RESULTS: Significant differences were found between the groups for both surface treatment and silane use (P < 0.05). The interaction between the two main effects was also significant (P < 0.05). Overall, the highest bond strengths were found when the low-pressure silicate ceramic deposition system (CJ-S) was used, with or without silane.
Authors: Amir Hossein Mirhashemi; Nasim Chiniforush; Nastaran Sharifi; Amir Mehdi Hosseini Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Mutlu Özcan; Pedro Henrique Corazza; Susana Maria Salazar Marocho; Silvia Helena Barbosa; Marco Antonio Bottino Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2012-10-19 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Batu Can Yaman; Begüm Güray Efes; Can Dörter; Yavuz Gömeç; Dina Erdilek; Oktay Yazıcıoğlu Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2010-02-17 Impact factor: 3.161