Literature DB >> 20498343

The neural correlates of attempting to suppress negative versus neutral memories.

Andrew J Butler1, Karin H James.   

Abstract

We performed an event-related fMRI study comparing attempts at suppressing recall of negative versus neutral memories. The hippocampus is crucial for successful explicit recall. Hippocampal activation has been shown to decrease during the suppression of previously learned neutral words. However, different effects may occur in the case of emotional memories. Participants first learned 40 word pairs consisting of a cue and either a neutral or a negative target. During fMRI scanning, the participants were shown the cues and were instructed to recall the targets or to suppress the targets, using attentional distraction. Similar right-lateralized frontoparietal regions were activated more during suppression than during recall, regardless of emotion. However, we show for the first time that lowered hippocampal activation occurs during the suppression of neutral, but not negative, words. Coinciding with this sustained hippocampal activation, the amygdala, insula, anterior cingulate, and fusiform gyrus showed greater activation during the suppression of negative memories than during suppression of neutral memories. Thus, during attempts to suppress negative memories, regions involved in the emotional and sensory aspects of memory reactivate, along with regions indexing conscious recall. Revealing the neural correlates and mechanisms of the suppression of negative memories has relevance for disorders such as posttraumatic stress disorder, in which traumatic memories often intrude and are associated with avoidance. Supplemental materials for this article may be downloaded from http://cabn.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20498343     DOI: 10.3758/CABN.10.2.182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  61 in total

1.  Suppressing unwanted memories by executive control.

Authors:  M C Anderson; C Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Paradoxical and less paradoxical effects of thought suppression: a critical review.

Authors:  E Rassin; H Merckelbach; P Muris
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-11

3.  Prefrontal regions orchestrate suppression of emotional memories via a two-phase process.

Authors:  Brendan E Depue; Tim Curran; Marie T Banich
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  ERP evidence for successful voluntary avoidance of conscious recollection.

Authors:  Zara M Bergström; Max Velmans; Jan de Fockert; Alan Richardson-Klavehn
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 5.  Visual memory and visual perception recruit common neural substrates.

Authors:  Scott D Slotnick
Journal:  Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev       Date:  2004-12

Review 6.  Is the reexperience of painful emotion therapeutic?

Authors:  J Littrell
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01

7.  The suppression of exciting thoughts.

Authors:  D M Wegner; J W Shortt; A W Blake; M S Page
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-03

Review 8.  The cognitive control of emotion.

Authors:  Kevin N Ochsner; James J Gross
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  The effects of suppressing trauma-related thoughts on women with rape-related posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  J C Shipherd; J G Beck
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1999-02

10.  The moderating effects of stimulus valence and arousal on memory suppression.

Authors:  Brian P Marx; Peter J Marshall; Frank Castro
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2008-04
View more
  22 in total

1.  The Organization of Right Prefrontal Networks Reveals Common Mechanisms of Inhibitory Regulation Across Cognitive, Emotional, and Motor Processes.

Authors:  B E Depue; J M Orr; H R Smolker; F Naaz; M T Banich
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  A neuroanatomical model of prefrontal inhibitory modulation of memory retrieval.

Authors:  Brendan E Depue
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Reduced neural activity of the prefrontal cognitive control circuitry during response inhibition to negative words in people with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ans Vercammen; Richard Morris; Melissa J Green; Rhoshel Lenroot; Jayashri Kulkarni; Vaughan J Carr; Cynthia S Weickert; Thomas W Weickert
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.186

4.  Moderate levels of activation lead to forgetting in the think/no-think paradigm.

Authors:  Greg J Detre; Annamalai Natarajan; Samuel J Gershman; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Do Not Respond! Doing the Think/No-Think and Go/No-Go Tasks Concurrently Leads to Memory Impairment of Unpleasant Items during Later Recall.

Authors:  Cornelia Herbert; Stefan Sütterlin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-01

6.  Intentional suppression can lead to a reduction of memory strength: behavioral and electrophysiological findings.

Authors:  Gerd T Waldhauser; Magnus Lindgren; Mikael Johansson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-16

7.  Memory suppression can help people "unlearn" behavioral responses--but only for nonemotional memories.

Authors:  Michiko Sakaki; Christof Kuhbandner; Mara Mather; Reinhard Pekrun
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-02

8.  Strength of Coupling within a mnemonic control network differentiates those who can and cannot suppress memory retrieval.

Authors:  Pedro M Paz-Alonso; Silvia A Bunge; Michael C Anderson; Simona Ghetti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Intentional retrieval suppression can conceal guilty knowledge in ERP memory detection tests.

Authors:  Zara M Bergström; Michael C Anderson; Marie Buda; Jon S Simons; Alan Richardson-Klavehn
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.251

10.  Opposing mechanisms support the voluntary forgetting of unwanted memories.

Authors:  Roland G Benoit; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.