Literature DB >> 17428451

ERP evidence for successful voluntary avoidance of conscious recollection.

Zara M Bergström1, Max Velmans, Jan de Fockert, Alan Richardson-Klavehn.   

Abstract

We investigated neurocognitive processes of voluntarily avoiding conscious recollection by asking participants to either attempt to recollect (the Think condition) or to avoid recollecting (the No-Think condition) a previously exposed paired associate. Event-related potentials (ERPs) during Think and No-Think trials were separated on the basis of previous learning success versus failure. This separation yielded temporal and topographic dissociations between early ERP effects of a Think versus No-Think strategy, which were maximal between 200 and 300 ms after stimulus presentation and independent of learning status, and a later learning-specific ERP effect maximal between 500 and 800 ms after stimulus presentation. In this later time-window, Learned Think items elicited a larger late left parietal positivity than did Not Learned Think, Learned No-Think, and Not Learned No-Think items; moreover, Learned No-Think and Not Learned Think items did not differ in late left parietal positivity. Because the late left parietal positivity indexes conscious recollection, the results provide firm evidence that conscious recollection of recollectable information can be voluntarily avoided on an item-specific basis and help to clarify previous neural evidence from the Think/No-Think procedure, which could not separate item-specific from strategic processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17428451     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  27 in total

1.  Inhibition and interference in the think/no-think task.

Authors:  Mihály Racsmány; Martin A Conway; Attila Keresztes; Attila Krajcsi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

2.  An interference account of cue-independent forgetting in the no-think paradigm.

Authors:  Tracy D Tomlinson; David E Huber; Cory A Rieth; Eddy J Davelaar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  A neuroanatomical model of prefrontal inhibitory modulation of memory retrieval.

Authors:  Brendan E Depue
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  EEG evidence that morally relevant autobiographical memories can be suppressed.

Authors:  Akul Satish; Robin Hellerstedt; Michael C Anderson; Zara M Bergström
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.526

5.  Moderate levels of activation lead to forgetting in the think/no-think paradigm.

Authors:  Greg J Detre; Annamalai Natarajan; Samuel J Gershman; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  Cognitive control mechanisms, emotion and memory: a neural perspective with implications for psychopathology.

Authors:  Marie T Banich; Kristen L Mackiewicz; Brendan E Depue; Anson J Whitmer; Gregory A Miller; Wendy Heller
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Why the white bear is still there: electrophysiological evidence for ironic semantic activation during thought suppression.

Authors:  Ryan J Giuliano; Nicole Y Y Wicha
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  The neural correlates of attempting to suppress negative versus neutral memories.

Authors:  Andrew J Butler; Karin H James
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Intentional suppression can lead to a reduction of memory strength: behavioral and electrophysiological findings.

Authors:  Gerd T Waldhauser; Magnus Lindgren; Mikael Johansson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-16

10.  Intentional retrieval suppression can conceal guilty knowledge in ERP memory detection tests.

Authors:  Zara M Bergström; Michael C Anderson; Marie Buda; Jon S Simons; Alan Richardson-Klavehn
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.