Literature DB >> 20498215

Both structural damage and inflammation of the spine contribute to impairment of spinal mobility in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Pedro Machado1, Robert Landewé, Jürgen Braun, Kay-Geert A Hermann, Daniel Baker, Désirée van der Heijde.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between spinal mobility, radiographic damage of the spine and spinal inflammation as assessed by MRI in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
METHODS: In this subanalysis of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Study for the Evaluation of Recombinant Infliximab Therapy cohort, 214 patients, representing an 80% random sample, were investigated. Only baseline data were used. MRI inflammation was assessed by the AS spinal MRI activity (ASspiMRI-a) score, structural damage by the modified Stoke AS Spine Score (mSASSS) and spinal mobility by the linear definition of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI). Univariate correlations were calculated on baseline values using Spearman rank correlation. Independent associations between the variables of interest were investigated by multivariate linear regression analysis. Associations with clinical disease activity, C-reactive protein, disease duration, age, gender, body mass index and HLA-B27 status were also investigated. Subanalyses were performed according to disease duration.
RESULTS: BASMI correlated moderately well with mSASSS (Spearman's rho=0.6) and weakly with ASspiMRI-a (rho=0.3). A best-fit model for BASMI included both mSASSS (regression coefficient (B)=0.865, p<0.001) and ASspiMRI-a (B=0.236, p=0.018). In patients with a disease duration < or = 3 years, B was greater for ASspiMRI-a than for mSASSS (0.595 vs 0.380), while in patients with a disease duration > 3 years B was greater for mSASSS than for ASspiMRI-a (0.924 vs 0.156).
CONCLUSION: Spinal mobility impairment in AS is independently determined both by irreversible spinal damage and by reversible spinal inflammation. Spinal mobility impairment is more influenced by spinal inflammation in early disease, and by structural damage in later disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20498215     DOI: 10.1136/ard.2009.124206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  73 in total

1.  The osteogenic potential of ligament fibroblasts is greater in ankylosing spondylitis patients than in patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  M Yang; H Yuan; M Miao; W Xu
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 2.  The balance of tissue repair and remodeling in chronic arthritis.

Authors:  Rik Lories
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 3.  Structural Disease Progression in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Still a Cause for Concern?

Authors:  Barbara Neerinckx; Rik J Lories
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Assessment of typical SpA lesions on MRI of the spine: do local readers and central readers agree in the DESIR-cohort at baseline?

Authors:  Manouk de Hooge; Jean-Baptiste Pialat; Monique Reijnierse; Désirée van der Heijde; Pascal Claudepierre; Alain Saraux; Maxime Dougados; Antoine Feydy
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  [Epionics SPINE-use of an objective method to examine spinal mobility in patients with axial spondyloarthritis].

Authors:  D Kiefer; X Baraliakos; B Bühring; U Kiltz; J Braun
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  [German Society for Rheumatology S3 guidelines on axial spondyloarthritis including Bechterew's disease and early forms: 3 Clinical symptoms].

Authors:  U Kiltz; M Rudwaleit; J Sieper; D Krause; J-F Chenot; A Stallmach; S Jaresch; U Oberschelp; E Schneider; B Swoboda; H Böhm; A Heiligenhaus; U Pleyer; W-H Böhncke; M Stemmer; J Braun
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  New population-based reference values for spinal mobility measures based on the 2009-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Shervin Assassi; Michael H Weisman; MinJae Lee; Laurie Savage; Laura Diekman; Tiffany A Graham; Mohammad H Rahbar; Joan I Schall; Lianne S Gensler; Atul A Deodhar; Daniel O Clegg; Robert A Colbert; John D Reveille
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 10.995

Review 8.  Mechanism of New Bone Formation in Axial Spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Denis Poddubnyy; Joachim Sieper
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 9.  To Wnt or not to Wnt: the bone and joint health dilemma.

Authors:  Rik J Lories; Maripat Corr; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 10.  Opinion: Perspectives on imaging in axial spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Xenofon Baraliakos; Jürgen Braun
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 20.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.