Literature DB >> 20496429

Collaboration with patients in the design of patient-reported outcome measures: capturing the experience of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis.

Joanna Nicklin1, Fiona Cramp, John Kirwan, Marie Urban, Sarah Hewlett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) need to include concepts and language relevant to patients and be easily understood. These studies aimed to develop draft PROMs to measure rheumatoid arthritis (RA) fatigue and its impact by collaborating with patients to identify language and experiences, create draft PROM items, and test them for comprehension, with decisions supported throughout by a patient research partner.
METHODS: In study 1, interview transcripts of RA patients describing their fatigue (n = 15) were subjected to content and inductive thematic analysis to identify fatigue language and experiences. In study 2, 3 focus groups of RA patients (n = 17) explored these and developed the wording for visual analog scales (VAS) and identical numerical rating scales (NRS), then a draft multi-item questionnaire was developed with the patient research partner. Study 3 comprised 15 RA patients who completed the PROMs during cognitive interviewing to explore understanding.
RESULTS: Studies 1 and 2 identified key patient terminology (fatigue, exhaustion) and 12 potential fatigue concepts (Cognition, Coping, Duration, Emotion, Energy, Frequency, Impact, Planning, Quality of Life, Relationships, Sleep, and Social Life). Patients' proposals were clarified into draft screening VAS/NRS for fatigue severity, effect, and coping, plus a draft 45-item questionnaire. Study 3 showed that 14 questions required clarification or revision of response options.
CONCLUSION: Collaboration with patients enabled development of draft RA fatigue PROMs grounded in the patient data, strengthening face and content validity and ensuring comprehension. The draft conceptual framework that emerged has resulted in draft PROMS ready for item reduction, and testing of construct and criterion validity and reliability.
Copyright © 2010 by the American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20496429     DOI: 10.1002/acr.20264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   4.794


  30 in total

Review 1.  Patient-reported outcome measures in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Wael El-Matary
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-11

2.  Patient and public involvement in patient-reported outcome measures: evolution not revolution.

Authors:  Sophie Staniszewska; Kirstie L Haywood; Jo Brett; Liz Tutton
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation of the Turkish version of the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire.

Authors:  Fulden Sari; Deran Oskay; Abdurrahman Tufan
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Building new roles and relationships in research: a model of patient engagement research.

Authors:  Nancy Marlett; Svetlana Shklarov; Deborah Marshall; Maria Jose Santana; Tracy Wasylak
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Item Development and Face Validity of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Patient Priorities in Pharmacological Interventions Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Tessa Sanderson; John Kirwan; Celia Almeida; Marianne Morris; Robert Noddings; Sarah Hewlett
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 6.  Quality and acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures used in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME): a systematic review.

Authors:  Kirstie L Haywood; Sophie Staniszewska; Sarah Chapman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  [Evaluation of effectiveness of education in rheumatology : Recommendations according to a patient education model].

Authors:  A Reusch; G Musekamp; R Küffner; M Dorn; J Braun; I Ehlebracht-König
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Do not forget the professional--the value of the FIRST model for guiding the structural involvement of patients in rheumatology research.

Authors:  Maarten P T de Wit; Janneke E Elberse; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Tineke A Abma
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: what is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium.

Authors:  Kirstie Haywood; Jo Brett; Sam Salek; Nancy Marlett; Colin Penman; Svetlana Shklarov; Colleen Norris; Maria Jose Santana; Sophie Staniszewska
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  International Society for Quality of Life Research commentary on the draft European Medicines Agency reflection paper on the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies.

Authors:  Derek Kyte; Bryce B Reeve; Fabio Efficace; Kirstie Haywood; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber; Madeleine T King; Josephine M Norquist; William R Lenderking; Claire Snyder; Lena Ring; Galina Velikova; Melanie Calvert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.