Literature DB >> 29423721

Reliability, validity, and cross-cultural adaptation of the Turkish version of the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire.

Fulden Sari1, Deran Oskay2, Abdurrahman Tufan3.   

Abstract

Up to 98% of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients experienced fatigue. It is an important physical and cognitive symptom which has overwhelming, uncontrollable, and unpredictable affects throughout their whole life. RA fatigue composes of complex and multi-dimensional components which are pain, stress, depression, inflammation, and disability. The acknowledgement of fatigue is important, and fatigue should be measured in all RA trials alongside the core set. The aim of this study was to determine reliability and validity of Turkish version of Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire in RA patients. One hundred RA patients were evaluated in the study. Exclusion criteria were determined as patients with cognitive impairment, illiterate patients, unable to understand and speak Turkish, under the age of 18, and over the age of 75. To validate Turkish version of Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire (BRAF-MDQ) (BRAF-MDQ-T), all participants answered BRAF-MDQ-T, Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) scale, and Short Form-36 vitality (SF-36 VT). BRAF-MDQ-T was applied again 7 days later for test-retest reliability. Validity, internal consistency, and test-retest results were based on a sample of 100 patients. Internal consistency reliability of BRAF-MDQ-T was Cronbach α = 0.95 which was excellent. The correlation between the total scores of the BRAF-MDQ-T scale and the total scores of MAF-T was statistically significant (r = 0.82, p < 0.001). The correlation between the total scores of the BRAF-MDQ-T scale and the subscale scores of SF-36 VT was statistically significant (r = - 0.64, p < 0.001). The BRAF-MDQ-T is a valid and reliable scale for the assessment of fatigue in Turkish rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fatigue; Questionnaire; Rheumatoid arthritis; Validity and reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29423721     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-018-4008-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  22 in total

1.  Quality of life profiles in the first years of rheumatoid arthritis: results from the EURIDISS longitudinal study.

Authors:  T P Suurmeijer; M Waltz; T Moum; F Guillemin; F L van Sonderen; S Briançon; R Sanderman; W J van den Heuvel
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-04

2.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Factor structure of the Profile of Mood States (POMS): two partial replications.

Authors:  J C Norcross; E Guadagnoli; J O Prochaska
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  1984-09

4.  The negative effect of decreasing the level of activity in coping with pain in rheumatoid arthritis: an increase in psychological distress and disease impact.

Authors:  W van Lankveld; G Näring; P van't Pad Bosch; L van de Putte
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2000-08

5.  Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system.

Authors:  S B Yellen; D F Cella; K Webster; C Blendowski; E Kaplan
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  The prevalence and meaning of fatigue in rheumatic disease.

Authors:  F Wolfe; D J Hawley; K Wilson
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  Correlates of fatigue in older adults with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  B L Belza; C J Henke; E H Yelin; W V Epstein; C L Gilliss
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  A validity and reliability study of the Turkish Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) scale in chronic musculoskeletal physical therapy patients.

Authors:  Yücel Yildirim; Gülbin Ergin
Journal:  J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.398

Review 9.  The assessment of fatigue: a practical guide for clinicians and researchers.

Authors:  A J Dittner; S C Wessely; R G Brown
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.006

10.  The revised Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue measures and the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease scale: validation in six countries.

Authors:  Sarah Hewlett; John Kirwan; Christina Bode; Fiona Cramp; Loreto Carmona; Emma Dures; Matthias Englbrecht; Jaap Fransen; Rosemary Greenwood; Sofia Hagel; Maart van de Laar; Anna Molto; Joanna Nicklin; Ingemar F Petersson; Marta Redondo; Georg Schett; Laure Gossec
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.580

View more
  1 in total

1.  The relationship between bristol rheumatoid arthritis fatigue scales and disease activity of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Seda Colak; Sevinc Can Sandikci; Derya Gokmen; Ahmet Omma
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.980

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.