Literature DB >> 26275979

International Society for Quality of Life Research commentary on the draft European Medicines Agency reflection paper on the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies.

Derek Kyte1, Bryce B Reeve2, Fabio Efficace3, Kirstie Haywood4, Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber5,6, Madeleine T King5,6, Josephine M Norquist7, William R Lenderking8, Claire Snyder9, Lena Ring10, Galina Velikova11, Melanie Calvert12.   

Abstract

In 2014, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) released for comment a draft reflection paper on the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies. A twelve-member International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) taskforce was convened to coordinate the ISOQOL response. Twenty-one ISOQOL members provided detailed comments and suggestions on the paper: 81 % from academia and 19 % from industry. Taskforce members consolidated and further refined these comments and shared the recommendations with the wider ISOQOL membership. A final response was submitted to the EMA in November 2014. The impending publication of the EMA reflection paper presents a valuable opportunity for ISOQOL to comment on the current direction of EMA PRO guidance and strategy. The EMA paper, although focused on cancer, could serve as a model for using PROs in other conditions, as it provides a useful update surrounding some of the design issues common to all trial research including PRO endpoints. However, we believe there are a number of additional areas in need of greater consideration. The purpose of this commentary is therefore to highlight the strengths of this timely and potentially useful document, but also to outline areas that may warrant further discussion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  European Medicines Agency; HRQL; Health-related quality of life; International Society for Quality of Life Research; Oncology; PROs; Patient-reported outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26275979     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1099-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  13 in total

Review 1.  Patterns of reporting health-related quality of life outcomes in randomized clinical trials: implications for clinicians and quality of life researchers.

Authors:  Michael Brundage; Brenda Bass; Judith Davidson; John Queenan; Andrea Bezjak; Jolie Ringash; Anna Wilkinson; Deb Feldman-Stewart
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Health-related quality of life in patients with glioblastoma: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin J B Taphoorn; Roger Stupp; Corneel Coens; David Osoba; Rolf Kortmann; Martin J van den Bent; Warren Mason; René O Mirimanoff; Brigitta G Baumert; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Peter Forsyth; Andrew Bottomley
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  What has been the effect on trial outcome assessments of a decade of patient participation in OMERACT?

Authors:  Maarten P T de Wit; Tineke A Abma; Marije S Koelewijn-van Loon; Sarah Collins; John Kirwan
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Patient and public involvement in patient-reported outcome measures: evolution not revolution.

Authors:  Sophie Staniszewska; Kirstie L Haywood; Jo Brett; Liz Tutton
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension.

Authors:  Melanie Calvert; Jane Blazeby; Douglas G Altman; Dennis A Revicki; David Moher; Michael D Brundage
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Adherence is the critical factor for achieving molecular responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who achieve complete cytogenetic responses on imatinib.

Authors:  David Marin; Alexandra Bazeos; Francois-Xavier Mahon; Lina Eliasson; Dragana Milojkovic; Marco Bua; Jane F Apperley; Richard Szydlo; Ritti Desai; Kasia Kozlowski; Christos Paliompeis; Victoria Latham; Letizia Foroni; Mathieu Molimard; Alistair Reid; Katy Rezvani; Hugues de Lavallade; Cristina Guallar; John Goldman; Jamshid S Khorashad
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Sandra A Mitchell; Amylou C Dueck; Ethan Basch; David Cella; Carolyn Miller Reilly; Lori M Minasian; Andrea M Denicoff; Ann M O'Mara; Michael J Fisch; Cynthia Chauhan; Neil K Aaronson; Corneel Coens; Deborah Watkins Bruner
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Inconsistencies in quality of life data collection in clinical trials: a potential source of bias? Interviews with research nurses and trialists.

Authors:  Derek Kyte; Jonathan Ives; Heather Draper; Thomas Keeley; Melanie Calvert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Patient reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials: is 'in-trial' guidance lacking? a systematic review.

Authors:  Derek G Kyte; Heather Draper; Jonathan Ives; Clive Liles; Adrian Gheorghe; Melanie Calvert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review.

Authors:  Felix Gradinger; Nicky Britten; Katrina Wyatt; Katherine Froggatt; Andy Gibson; Ann Jacoby; Fiona Lobban; Debbie Mayes; Dee Snape; Tim Rawcliffe; Jennie Popay
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  5 in total

1.  Relationship between subjective and actigraphy-measured sleep in 237 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Oxana Palesh; Karyn Haitz; Francis Lévi; Georg A Bjarnason; Carl Deguzman; Igbal Alizeh; Ayhan Ulusakarya; Mary Melissa Packer; Pasquale F Innominato
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  The patient-reported outcome content of international ovarian cancer randomised controlled trial protocols.

Authors:  Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber; Michael Friedlander; Peey-Sei Kok; Melanie Calvert; Derek Kyte; Martin Stockler; Madeleine T King
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Evaluation of patient-reported outcome protocol content and reporting in UK cancer clinical trials: the EPiC study qualitative protocol.

Authors:  Ameeta Retzer; Thomas Keeley; Khaled Ahmed; Jo Armes; Julia M Brown; Lynn Calman; Chris Copland; Fabio Efficace; Anna Gavin; Adam Glaser; Diana M Greenfield; Anne Lanceley; Rachel M Taylor; Galina Velikova; Michael Brundage; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber; Madeleine T King; Melanie Calvert; Derek Kyte
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Development of multifactor index for assessing quality of life of a tribal population of India: multilevel analysis approach.

Authors:  M Bagavandas
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Investigating the impact of open label design on patient-reported outcome results in prostate cancer randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Guillaume Mouillet; Fabio Efficace; Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin; Emilie Charton; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Francesco Sparano; Amélie Anota
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.